Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
Marjorie Taylor Greene on Ukraine, Speakership Fallout, Big Tech, CIA/FBI and More
Video Transcript: System Update #33
February 02, 2023
post photo preview

Note From Glenn Greenwald: The following is the full show transcript, for subscribers only, of a recent episode of our System Update program, broadcast live on Rumble on Wednesday, February 1, 2023. Going forward, every new transcript will be sent out by email and posted to our Locals page, where you'll find the transcripts for previous shows. 


Watch System Update Episode #33 Here on Rumble.

Virtually everything that can be said about our guest tonight, Marjorie Taylor Greene, has been said, often without the slightest regard for whether or not it is true. But whatever one's views of her may be, there is no denying that in a very short period of time – she is just now entering her second term in Congress – she has become one of the most prominent, influential and popular politicians in America. 

As The New York Times recounted in an article on her complex history with current House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, when Democrats were plotting to strip her of all of her Committee assignments due to controversial comments she made on the Internet before she was even elected to Congress, she “stormed into Mr. McCarthy's office in the Capitol late one night, in February 2021, and handed him a letter signed by local Republican leaders in her district, urging him to keep her on committees. They had received “countless messages”, they said, from their voters who were intent on supporting her.” 

Many things interest me about the Republican Congresswoman representing Georgia’s 14th Congressional District – her strident opposition to bipartisan foreign policy orthodoxy in Washington, the still escalating U.S. role in the war in Ukraine, her opposition to the evils of the U.S. Security State and Big Tech: all of which we'll talk about – but one often overlooked aspect of her quick rise to prominence is the Founders’ aspiration to have a country free of a professionalized political class, but instead one that would be governed by “citizen-legislators” – people who have other jobs and professions beyond “politician” and who go to Washington for a few years after a lot of experience elsewhere to serve in the model of public service and then go back to their regular lives. 

Anyone who was able to construct a prominent political profile without decades of striving for political power, without drearily climbing the career ladder from low-level political office and trying to take a step up every few years, without the benefit of a famous political parent or a famous family name – in other words, a self-made person in Washington – is automatically someone who will be of greater interest to me than people who seemingly popped out of the womb dreaming of one day being in the U.S. Senate. Whatever else one might think of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example, that's true of her, and it's at least equally true of Congresswoman Greene. 

Look at the two most senior politicians who lead their respective parties in the Senate. Republican leader Mitch McConnell has been a senator since 1985 – for almost 40 years. Other than a few years in the early 1970s when he worked as a lawyer, McConnell has never had any job outside of being a politician. The Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, was elected to the New York State Assembly at the age of 24. He was elected to the U.S. Congress in 1980 at the age of 30, and then to the U.S. Senate in 1999. He's been in Congress for 43 years. It's impossible to find people more insular and insulated and aberrational than they – their lives bear not even the slightest resemblance to those whom they pretend to represent. 

When AOC first ran for Congress, in 2018, almost nobody paid attention to her primary race, in large part because nobody had even heard of her opponent, Joe Crowley. That was the case, even though Crowley was one of the most powerful members of Congress: entrenched in House Democratic leadership and touted as the likely successor to Nancy Pelosi. 

But almost nobody in his district even knew who he was. He barely visited Queens, the district he nominally represented. There was no such thing as a “Joe Crowley supporter”. His extremely significant power had nothing to do with any popular support – he had none – and it has everything to do with his ability to navigate the backrooms of Congress, where a lobbyist for Google and Raytheon lurk, telling party leadership, both parties, what they want, as they hand over massive checks to build their war chests. That's the reality of how Washington works and has worked for decades in both parties. 

Marjorie Taylor Greene's power comes exclusively from popular support. Her relevance depends only upon one thing: the fact that, whether you like it or not, millions of Americans trust her, support her and will stand behind her. And that's what should matter. 

Regardless of what you think about her causes and her ideology – and she is, needless to say, a deeply polarizing figure, as is almost everyone who holds genuinely passionate convictions as a matter of principle – I think one could say without much controversy that she's the most organic and authentic representation in Congress of the MAGA movement that attracted the support of tens of millions of Americans from every walk of life, from every racial and ethnic group and from every part of the country. And that just has to matter in politics. The fact that someone actually has large amounts of popular support. In Washington, for those who know how to wield it – and she has learned a lot about how to do so in the past two years – that's real power. 

There was a reason that “citizen-legislators”, rather than a professionalized political class, was what the Founders envisioned. By definition, people have lived most of their lives without political power and political office has far more in common with those they are supposed to represent. They tend to be far more willing to learn, to grow, to evolve – not as the result of calculating careerist decisions, but simply because people who arrive in Washington afresh are not yet dependent upon it. They typically end up seeing things and learning things about how the country really works, and that, in turn, makes them less captive to party and dogma and more open to growth and change. 

Congresswoman Greene is no ordinary member of Congress, and she's no ordinary Republican either. Many of her most passionately held views are ones that were utterly anathema to the Republican Party until Donald Trump came along in 2016 and became the Republican nominee for president not by affirming and validating long standing Republican orthodoxies – voters already had Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio if they wanted that – but instead, by denouncing and vowing to uproot his own party's establishment orthodoxies. 

For that reason, Greene often inspires more anger and contempt in establishment Republican circles than she does among American liberals. Many of her views, her worldview, and her approach to politics, are a threat to subvert the GOP establishment and they know that. And that's why many of them despise her. But conservative voters also know that she's a threat to subvert the GOP establishment and that's why so many of them trust and support her. 

There are a lot more views I have to share about Congresswoman Greene but rather than take more time for me to express those, I'd rather spend our time letting her speak for herself. I'm thrilled that she's here tonight to do just that. 


G. Greenwald: Congresswoman, good evening. It's great to see you. Thanks so much for taking the time to talk to us. 

Rep. Greene: Hi, Glenn. I'm thrilled to be here. Thank you for having me. 

G. Greenwald: Absolutely. So, I was just talking about one of the things that I find interesting about your rise to prominence in such a short period of time, which is the pre-political trajectory you had, you didn't spend a lot of time plotting how to get elected to politics. You never ran for office. Previously, you had what I would describe as a life that has a lot in common with ordinary Americans. Talk about just in general, what your life was before you became Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, and how that shapes the work you do in Washington. 

Rep. Greene:  Well, I am just a regular American. I've never been in politics before, never held political office. I never even went to a meeting. As a matter of fact, I'm a business owner. Very proud mom, that's the best part of my life. And I just became angry over time with the failures that I saw in Washington, D.C., that regular Americans were able to get done every single day in our and our normal lives. Being a business owner and growing up in a family business, serving our customers was the most important thing we could do. I was raised with the belief that the customer is king, and I see the American taxpayer as the customer of the federal government. But I see complete failure from our federal government. We're basically on the brink of falling apart. So, I decided that instead of complaining on Facebook or social media or to my friends, I thought, okay, I'll step up to the plate and take a swing at this and see if I can do a better job. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
40
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
After-Show with Glenn & Michael Tracey

Yesterday's After-Show was streamed LIVE from our Rumble link. If you missed it, check it out here!

Glenn and Michael discuss a wide range of topics.

00:51:45
CLIP: Glenn Greenwald Debates Alan Dershowitz on Iran

Glenn warns against waging wars during last week’s debate against Alan Dershowitz on whether the U.S. should strike Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Glenn argues: “We don't go around the world attacking other countries or trying to remove their government because we want to give those people freedom and democracy. We only [attack] when we see a government that doesn't do our bidding."

We are grateful to The Soho Forum and Reason for hosting the spirited debate. You can listen to the full debate here: https://reason.com/podcast/2024/05/24/glenn-greenwald-and-alan-dershowitz-debate-bombing-iran/

00:05:23
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: BREAKING! We Want YOUR Input

What’s happening in politics that you want to talk about? Are there any burning topics you think Glenn needs to cover? Any thoughts you’d like to share?

This post will be pinned to our profile for the remainder of this week, so comment below anytime with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Glenn will respond to a few comments here—and may even address some on our next supporters-only After Show.

Thank you so much for your continued support through another week of SYSTEM UPDATE with Glenn Greenwald!

post photo preview

Memes to make you smile!😄🤣😅😆😁

Dick Cheney is also voting for Kamala, not just Liz.

In light of this, nobody with a double-digit IQ or higher could vote for Kamala or encourage others to do so. There is no logic in such a vote.

https://www.businessinsider.com/dick-cheney-vote-kamala-harris-liz-2024-9

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/sep/06/dick-cheney-vote-kamala-harris

https://nypost.com/2024/09/06/us-news/former-gop-vice-president-dick-cheney-will-vote-for-kamala-harris/

post photo preview
Dems Desperately Revive Russian Interference Hysteria Ahead of Election; French Politics Analyst Arnaud Bertrand On Macron's Refusal To Accept Election Results
Video Transcript

Watch the full episode HERE

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening everybody. It is Wednesday, September 4. As you can see, we are still not in our regular studio. That's because I continue to be traveling concerning some work, and each time I get to a new place, we seem to have a little bit of technical issues trying to make sure it works. Hopefully, it is now working because there's a lot to talk about tonight, including a guest that I'm really interested in talking to. So, let's roll the dice and see what it is that we can do. It's interesting. I was on Megan Kelly's program for two full hours today using exactly this setup, and it worked perfectly. So, let's try and give it a go. 

So, for tonight: Whenever a Democrat is nearby and encounter someone or something that they dislike, one thing is certain: they will start ranting and raving about Russia and accusing whatever or whoever is bothering them of being controlled by or being subservient to the Kremlin. The list of their targets since 2016 is too long to count but today – with the election just two months away – they resurrected yet again this old, crusty, cliched, tired Cold War script to try to claim that Vladimir Putin yet again – while running Russia, overseeing a war in Ukraine, managing his country's complex oil economy – is, in his spare time, also trying to propagandize the American citizenry through all sorts of covert influence campaigns. 

Earlier this morning, the Biden administration leaked to many of its favorite reporters that it was about to make a major announcement accusing the Kremlin of trying to interfere in the 2024 election, exactly what they did in 2016 and 2020 and many times before. Who could have ever guessed that? With the election just two months away, Democrats would start talking about Russia. But that, of course, is exactly what they're doing. Hours later, the DOJ issued a lengthy indictment of various Russians and the state-owned RT purporting to detail how these influence operations are being carried out. The indictment very deliberately and purposely named without naming a wide range of conservative influencers who they accuse of either knowingly or unwittingly having accepted Russian money to deliver pro-Kremlin messaging. 

While this document, like all indictments, is filled with nothing but unproven accusations, they're being treated as gospel facts. And as a side note, this is something I've seen many times. The Justice Department issues an indictment based on allegations that come from the U.S. security state and it's almost like nobody questions it. Whatever the DOJ said is what happened ends up being accepted as true. To do that in general is misguided but to do it about a highly politicized document just two months away from a national election, when Democrats do exactly this almost reflexively, now seems to me like madness. But even if every single claim in this indictment is true, even if it ends up being proven to be true, the magnitude of this so-called influence campaign run by the Kremlin is laughably tiny. It barely even rises to the level where it wasn't being called trivial. It's just clearly yet another act of standard Democratic Party reflex to scream Russia whenever they feel endangered. So, we're going to examine this indictment because of the historical context surrounding it and what the implications are. 

Then: two separate elections were held in France over the past several months. One was an election for France's seats to the EU, and that election was won by Marine Le Pen's right-wing party. Following that, President Emmanuel Macron called new elections to have a vote to determine who should compose the French legislature, and that election was won by a coalition of left-wing parties. One of the major messages, obvious messages, of both of those votes, was a rejection of the Macron government, which won neither of those seats. 

We covered these elections, both of them extensively. At the time, we've had analysts on our show to talk about not only what drove the outcomes but also what the impact on French politics would be in general and, specifically, how it would change the French government. I mean, that's the idea of democracy is you have a vote not just to be a symbolic expression of people's beliefs but in order to let them determine the composition of their own government. And yet, as it turns out, absolutely nothing has changed in France or with the French government since those votes and that's because President Emmanuel Macron, his party and his government, have basically pretended that the election never even happened. Even Macron's protégé – Prime Minister Gabriel Attal – continues in office even though his party lost a majority, and even though he tendered his resignation immediately after the election, only for Macron to refuse it. He continues to be the prime minister overseeing the legislators until this very day. 

One of the guests we had on to evaluate the election results was the political analyst, Arnaud Bertrand, and he will be here to join us tonight to talk about, among other things, the bizarre spectacle of a country that bombastically claims to be one of the leaders of the democratic world, simply ignoring a national election because it doesn't like the outcome.

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Michael Tracey On Trump & Kamala's Interviews and Israel Policies; Ukraine War Developments & U.S. Sanctions on Chinese Companies; Richard Hanania Interview
Video Transcript

Watch the full episode HERE

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Hello. Welcome to another exciting edition of System Update here on Rumble, the free speech alternative to YouTube System Update. Glenn is once again away. So, tonight I'm going to do my best to serve you, because that's what I live to do. We are going to discuss a couple of items that I think are of public interest. Did I mention that I'm Michael Tracey? If not, you should be aware of me by now, I would hope. Although you might be better off just forgetting about me. 

Tonight, we're going to first discuss some of the media appearances that our two glorious presidential nominees, Donald J. Trump and Kamala D. Harris – is that her middle initial? I think so – have graced us with. 

Kamala Harris only provided her first interview of the entire campaign last week and Donald Trump has been gabbing it up a little bit more extensively. There are a couple of items there that I think you'll want to be apprised of. 

Then, we're going to go through a couple of developments around Ukraine and discuss those developments with Richard Hanania, who is, I don't know what he is exactly. He's an all-purpose commentator polemicist – he might even say troll, but in an endearing way – and it should be enlightening and informative and that's it. 

So. for now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting now. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
SYSTEM UPDATE RECAP: August 26-30
Weekly Recap

Welcome to the SYSTEM UPDATE recap: your weekend digest featuring everything we’ve covered throughout the previous week. 

Prefer to listen to your daily news analysis? A reminder that FULL episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE are available anywhere you listen to podcasts🎙️


MONDAY, AUGUST 26 - EPISODE 322

Telegram Founder & CEO Arrested in France as Online Censorship Escalates; Interview: Congressman Warren Davidson (R-OH) Speaks Out Against Speech Crackdowns

The online censorship regime escalates as the French government arrests Telegram’s founder & CEO, Pavel Durov on grounds that he was “complicit” in allowing alleged illegal activity on the app. 

 

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

WATCH THE EPISODE

 

TIMESTAMPS: 

Intro (6:40)

Telegram Founder Arrested in France (12:36) 

Interview with Congressman Warren Davidson (R-OH) (45:57) 

Credits (1:02:48)

 

TUESDAY, AUGUST 27 - EPISODE 323

Mark Zuckerberg On How FBI Lies Caused Facebook to Suppress 2020 Biden Reporting; Ongoing, Worsening Threats to Free Speech Over Israel

Mark Zuckerberg admits how the Biden administration pressured Facebook to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, COVID-related posts, and more. Social media apps and U.S. college campuses enforce stricter guidelines in order to silence anti-Israel dissent. 

 

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

WATCH THE EPISODE

 

TIMESTAMPS: 

Intro (8:34)

Biden Admin Pressured Facebook to Censor (20:39)

Speech Crackdown Over Israel (57:03)

Outro (1:13:21)

 

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 28 - EPISODE 324

Dangerous Charges Brought Against Pavel Durov By France; Columbia Student Protester On Campus Free Speech And Fall Protests

France charges Pavel Durov – founder and CEO of Telegram – with crimes that drastically and dangerously escalate the censorship regime in the democratic world. Columbia/Barnard student protester Maryam Iqbal joins us to talk about the threats of censorship faced by Pro-Palestinian groups on college campuses ahead of the fall semester. 

 

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

WATCH THE EPISODE

 

TIMESTAMPS: 

Intro (12:50)

New Details in Pavel Durov Arrest (17:03) 

Interview with Columbia/Barnard Student Protester Maryam Iqbal (44:10)

Credits (1:09:54)

 

THURSDAY, AUGUST 29 - EPISODE 325

Brazil's Repressive Censorship Judge To Ban X Nationwide; Has Trump 2024 Retained Its Populist Ideology? With Sohrab Ahmari

With the failure of X’s Brazilian office to comply with Alexandre de Moraes’ secret censorship order, Brazilian courts look to ban the social media app. Sohrab Ahmari discusses his new article and whether the Trump 2024 campaign has retained its populist ideology. 

 

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

WATCH THE EPISODE

 

TIMESTAMPS: 

Intro (12:55)

Censorship Escalation in Brazil (19:00)

Interview with Sohrab Ahmari (44:27)

Outro (1:22:47)

 

Supporters-Only After-Show for Thursday, August 29

We moved to Locals for our supporters-only, interactive after-show where Glenn shared his thoughts on some audience questions and comments:

 

@zkhan101

What are your thoughts on propaganda about Bashar Al Assad being used by Israeli and U.S. corporate media to divide pro-Palestine Americans (especially Muslims) and discredit independent media outlets like the Grayzone? Would love if you covered this on the show sometime!!

 

@segoforth

RFK Jr’s campaign suspension speech talked extensively about children’s growing chronic conditions and how to reverse them through nutrition. His advisor on this is Calley Means a former DC employee of Coke and a whistleblower on big food and big pharma. Calley Means has said that he and his team have been working on executive orders, food and pharma agency reform (USDA, FDA, etc.) and legislation (farm subsidies, etc.). Given that you are vegan and concerned about health and food personally, do you think this approach, working toward improving the type and quality of food available in the U.S., would pave the way for a universal health plan as children and adult get healthier through food intake? Also, how successful do you think this approach could be given the growing concern about health among the U.S. population?

 

Available for paid supporters here.

Want to join us every Tuesday and Thursday for this supporter-exclusive, live after-show? Become a paid supporter here!

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals