Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
INTERVIEW: John Mearsheimer—Leading International Relations Scholar—On US Power & the Darkness Ahead for Ukraine
Video Transcript
July 03, 2023
post photo preview

Watch the full episode here:

placeholder

 

Good evening. It's Friday, June 30.  Welcome to a new episode of System Update, our live nightly show that airs every Monday through Friday, at 7:00 p.m. Eastern, exclusively here, on Rumble, the free speech alternative to YouTube.

Back in 2002 and 2003, the debate over whether to invade the war in Iraq was marked by all sorts of dissent repression techniques. The marginalization of critics was so extreme that even the corporate outlets responsible for them were forced to issue mea culpas.

In 2004, the New York Times issued an "Editors' Note" apologizing for their one-sided coverage of the debate, fueled by an uncritical appearance of unverified claims from the US intelligence community: "Looking back," said the Paper of Record, "we wish we had been more aggressive in re-examining the claims as new evidence emerged -- or failed to emerge." 

Also in 2004, The Washington Post's media critic, Howard Kurtz, published a critique of his paper's one-sided coverage of Iraq, entitled; "The Post on WMDs: An Inside Story - Prewar Articles Questioning Threat Often Didn't Make Front Page." He wrote: 

 

Days before the Iraq war began, veteran Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus put together a story questioning whether the Bush administration had proof that Saddam Hussein was hiding weapons of mass destruction. But he ran into resistance from the paper's editors, and his piece ran only after assistant managing editor Bob Woodward, who was researching a book about the drive toward war, "helped sell the story," Pincus recalled. "Without him, it would have had a tough time getting into the paper." Even so, the article was relegated to Page A17.

 

"We did our job but we didn't do enough, and I blame myself mightily for not pushing harder," Woodward said in an interview. "We should have warned readers we had information that the basis for this was shakier" than widely believed. "Those are exactly the kind of statements that should be published on the front page." (The Washington Post, August 12, 2004)

 

But the repression surrounding dissent toward the US in Ukraine makes the debate over the Iraq War look balanced, open and free. Even the most accomplished scholars with the most impressive academic pedigrees have been almost entirely marginalized – excluded – from corporate media outlets which rarely, if ever, allow dissent to Biden's proxy war in the U.S. to be aired. 

That includes as our guest tonight: John Mearsheimer, the long-time R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of International Relations at the University of Chicago, who has been heralded by academic journalists as one of the most influential scholars in the field.

Sometimes this repression has taken the form of brute repression: shortly after the invasion, the EU made it illegal – a crime – to provide a platform to any state media from Russia. Big Tech has routinely censored those who express dissenting views about the prevailing Western narrative on the war but, as is the case for Professor Mearsheimer and so many others who have a divergent perspective on this war, they are simply ignored – denied access to major corporate outlets – which opt instead to have a virtually dissent-free discourse that pretends that everyone knowledgeable supports the war policy of Biden and the EU.

Independent media - on platforms devoted to free speech, as such Rumble - is one of the few instruments for undermining that dissent-suppression. We are, for that reason and so many others, delighted to show you this in-depth discussion of the war in Ukraine and the U.S. role in the world which we recorded with Professor Mearsheimer earlier today.

As a reminder, System Update is available in podcast form as well. You can follow us on Spotify, Apple and all other major podcasting platforms. The episodes are posted 12 hours after they first air, live, here on Rumble and you can rate and review each episode which helps us spread the visibility of the program.

NOTE: As a programming note, we will be off on Monday and Tuesday nights for the Fourth of July holiday, then, back on Wednesday night of next week at our regular time at 7 p.m.

Here is our interview with Prof. Mearsheimer, which we genuinely found very enlightening, and we hope you do as well.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
11
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
8 minutes ago

What is going on here:
Iowa has the first-in-the-nation caucus, where Iowans will gather to pick who they want to see as their party's Presidential candidate. But things are a bit different this year. Learn more about what will happen on caucus night - Monday, January 15, 2024 (at 7 pm).

Only Republicans will pick and announce their Presidential choice that night. Iowa Democrats will still hold a caucus to conduct party business (like setting the party's issue priorities), but they will pick their preferred Presidential candidate using a mail-in preference card that can be requested now through February 19, 2024. Mail-in ballots will begin hitting your mailboxes on January 12, 2024.

I think Dave Rubin tried to associate himself with Eric Weinstein’s analysis, as a way of providing a response to being called out for his hypocrisy… his use of the word “we” and “people like us” is pretty funny and pathetic… as well as staged/pre planned

post photo preview
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: We Want to Hear From YOU!
Weekly Weigh-In

Thank you so much for your continued support through another week of SYSTEM UPDATE with Glenn Greenwald! Any thoughts you’d like to share?

This post will be pinned to our profile for the next week, so comment below anytime with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Glenn may even address some particularly interesting exchanges on our next supporters-only After Show.

 

🏆Dog-of-the-Week:

Sleepy Sylvester works hard on some thoughtful responses with co-host Glenn on our Locals after show.

Read full Article
post photo preview
SYSTEM UPDATE NEWSLETTER: NOV 27 - DEC 1
Weekly Newsletter

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week. These are written versions of the reporting and analysis we did on last week's episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE.

—Glenn Greenwald

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
SYSTEM UPDATE RECAP: NOV 27- DEC 1
Weekly Recap

Good Morning SYSTEM UPDATE Community,

Welcome to the SYSTEM UPDATE recap, your weekend digest featuring everything we’ve covered throughout the previous week. 

Enjoy!

 

Prefer to listen to your daily news analysis? Reminder that FULL episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE are available anywhere you listen to podcasts🎙️

 

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27 - EPISODE 187

Elon Meets Netanyahu in Israel—Why? Vivek Ramaswamy on Free Speech Debates, Ukraine, & More. Plus: CNN & Senate Dems Demand More Censorship Over Israel

Full transcript available for paid supporters here.

 

WATCH THE EPISODE:

placeholder
 

Intro (6:48)

Censorship Demands Continue (13:37)

Elon Visits Israel (32:09)

Interview with Vivek Ramaswamy (1:11:06)

Ending (1:34:58)

 

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 - EPISODE 188

Americans Fired Since Oct. 7—What They Really Said. Is TikTok Censoring for China or the US? 

Full transcript available for paid supporters here.

 

WATCH THE EPISODE:

placeholder
 

Intro (9:38)

Canceling Israel’s Critics (14:58)

Who Does TikTok Really Serve? (55:29)

Ending (1:29:18)

 

Supporters-Only After Show for Tuesday, November 28

We moved to Locals for our supporters-only, interactive after show, where Glenn shared his thoughts on some burning audience questions:

 

@Tbone316

Almost none of the Arab countries will back up the Palestinian cause with any impactful political actions. And if a certain Arab country does decide to, they get destroyed literally or metaphorically. How can the Palestinians have any chance of statehood if these geopolitical conditions and order remains?  

 

@icon-dots

Irish viewer here. Do you have any thoughts on the ongoing Irish hate speech legislation? Have you ever considered having MEP Clare Daly on the show? 

 

Available for paid supporters here

Want to join us every Tuesday and Thursday for this supporter-exclusive, live after show? Become a paid supporter here!

 

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29 - EPISODE 189

Leading Palestine Expert Rashid Khalidi on Israel-Gaza, College Campuses, & More. Plus: Elon Musk’s Defiant Message to Disney

Full transcript available for paid supporters here.

 

WATCH THE EPISODE:

placeholder
 

Intro (4:18)

Elon’s Defiant Message to Disney (9:35)

Interview with Rashid Khalidi (24:53)

Ending (1:15:21)

 

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30 - EPISODE 190

The Murderous Life & Legacy of Henry Kissinger: Perfect Symbol of the Rotted US Security State

Full transcript will be available for paid supporters here.

 

WATCH THE EPISODE:

placeholder
 

Intro (10:40)

Henry Kissinger: A Murderous Legacy (16:30)

Ending (1:38:24)

 

Supporters-Only After Show for Thursday, November 30

We moved to Locals for our supporters-only, interactive after show, where Glenn shared his thoughts on some burning audience questions:  

 

@Thefarside

Your shows on free speech have been very informative. You distinguished between state action and private company decisions in the context of firings for example. I’ve been wondering how to think about free speech at universities and in particular whether the rules are different for private vs. public/state universities. And even for private universities whether it matters if they receive government funding. Thanks.

 

@GotrekGurnnison 

Glenn, can we get a deep look at some of these 3rd party corporations involved in "Trust and Safety" i.e. censorship? Seems like platforms are outsourcing more and more censorship to 3rd parties and it is a massively booming business model.

 

Available for paid supporters here.

 

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 1 - EPISODE 191

Taibbi/Shellenberger Clash with Censorship Regime in Congress (Again). DEBATE: Glenn & Israel Supporter, Max Abrahms Discuss War in Gaza

Full transcript will be available for paid supporters on Monday.

 

WATCH THE EPISODE:

placeholder
 

Intro (7:34)

Facing the Censorship Regime (12:04)

Interview with Max Abrahms (37:21)

Ending (1:48:26)

 

*Today’s show was brought to you by the Wellness Company. Go to twc.health/GLENN and grab your prescription kits now–code GLENN saves you 10% at checkout!  

 

Thank you so much for your continued support—have a great week!

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals