Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
Unmasking the Destructive Career of Neocon-Monster Victoria Nuland—Now Second-in-Command of Biden’s State Department
Video Transcript
August 15, 2023
post photo preview

Watch the full episode here:

placeholder

 

Good evening. It's Monday, August 14. Welcome to a new episode of System Update, our live nightly show that airs every Monday through Friday at 7 p.m. Eastern, exclusively here on Rumble, the free speech alternative to YouTube. 

Tonight: we are constantly told that voting is how we control our government and keep it accountable, that the two political parties are so radically different that they simply cannot agree on anything anymore, that the days of bipartisanship are, therefore, sadly over, and that the abuses and excesses of the War on Terror have been fully acknowledged, processed and integrated into the decision-making matrix of our political system. There are many ways to show that each of these propositions is flagrantly false, but one need not explore all of those. And that's because we have to look at just one person who is the living, breathing embodiment of everything that is rotted, deceitful and destructive not in one of the two political parties, but in the bipartisan DC ruling class. Her name is Victoria Nuland. She was just promoted by President Biden to the position of Deputy Secretary of State, the second highest ranking position in the State Department behind Secretary of State Antony Blinken, whose place she is highly likely to assume if Biden is re-elected – or, for that matter, if most – though not all – of the Republican candidates are elected president. 

Nuland is in the news this week because she made an extremely embarrassing trip to the country of Niger, where she demanded that the prior president, whom the U.S. was able to control, be reinstated by the military junta that just removed him in a coup. And she threatened all sorts of reprisals for failure to obey. Nuland pretended publicly that the U.S.'s motive in demanding a change of government there is that it stands opposed to coups. The United States simply does not accept the overturning of the democratic order. That argument was literally laughed at in Niger's capital, where they unflinchingly rejected Nuland’s demands to visit with the U.S. puppet who is now under house arrest. In most of the world, Nuland’s attempt to feign anger over coups or attacks on democracy is simply laughed at, after all, this is the same Victoria Nuland that got caught on a recorded telephone call in 2014 plotting to install a pro-U.S. leader as the next president of Ukraine, once the one who was in power – the democratically elected one the U.S. disliked – was removed from power one year before his term expired under the Constitution: all is the result of U.S. supported protest movements that drove that elected president from power in Ukraine. Indeed, Nuland was seen in the square outside of the presidential palace in Kyiv, handing out food, drinks and other refreshments to the anti-government forces that had gathered to demand the removal of the elected president. I imagine if the Russian foreign minister or the Chinese foreign minister came to the United States and joined Occupy Wall Street or Tea Party protests in 2010 to cheer on the angry crowd, promised them support and tell them their cause was just. That's exactly what Nuland did in Ukraine. 

Her flamboyant family trip to Niger – to save that country's democracy – happened in the same week that a U.S. State Department cable emerged proving that the State Department officials were threatening the Pakistani military with punishments if it did not immediately remove the country's elected prime minister, Imran Khan. The U.S. at the time was furious that Khan had announced Pakistan's neutrality in the war in Ukraine and wanted him gone from power, a power to which he had been democratically elected. Within weeks of that meeting with the State Department, Khan was indeed removed from power, and now he's been charged and convicted on dubious corruption charges and has been imprisoned. Despite being the country's most popular politician, or rather exactly because of that fact, he is now banned from running for political office for the next several years. 

When Victoria Nuland clinches around on the international stage, feigning anger over coups and attacks on democracy, it is purely for domestic consumption, other than employees of American corporate media and its captive audience, nobody believes this when U.S. officials say it, least of all when it comes from someone with Victoria Nuland history. But like it or not, Nuland is a very influential power figure in Washington. She becomes seemingly more powerful every year, and that means she deserves a lot more attention and journalistic scrutiny than she has received. So, we're going to devote tonight's show to doing exactly that, asking who is Victoria Nuland. 

How does someone go from a high-level political position in the Clinton administration in the 1990s running Russian policy, to becoming Dick Cheney's top adviser in guiding him to advocate for and implement the invasion of Iraq, to working on Russia for the Obama administration, under Hillary Clinton, and then, running Ukraine under John Kerry to once again running Ukraine under Joe Biden? Note that you can vote for whichever political party you want, and Victoria Nuland will still be in power. The only time she was out of power was when Donald Trump was president. And how is it possible that someone who is a neocon extremist, someone who was not only steadfastly devoted to policies that proved to be so destructive, advocating endless wars and regime change as a way to ostensibly spread democracy, is also an integral part of one of the most radical and influential neocon families in the United States and yet, she maintains such popularity in Washington well after neoconservatism was supposedly permanently discredited, disgraced and discarded? 

The answers are found in Victoria Nuland, not because she's unique, but because she's so common in Washington. Just as Jeffrey Goldberg's media career trajectory is so representative of corporate media, the more he lies and spreads conspiracy theories that serve the agenda of the U.S. security state, the more he is rewarded and promoted. So too is Nuland's ideology and career trajectory, highly revealing of what is really valued in Washington. In light of her new promotion and her likely future, one asking “Who is Victoria Nuland?” is urgent and informative in and of itself. Asking that question also reveals to us what Washington really is. 

As a reminder, we are encouraging our audience to download the Rumble app, which is of very high quality. It works, I think, a lot better than the browser and it works for our phones or Smart TV is it enables you to follow our program and follow other Rumble programs as well. When you turn on “notifications,’ that means you don't have to wait around. It will automatically notify you of this show and whatever other shows you choose to follow. Downloading the app will really help our show as we build our audience even further. You can encourage other people to download the app, and it really helps Rumble in its ongoing defense of free speech. So, we really encourage you to do that and we think you'll find it to be a benefit for you as well. 

System Update is also available in podcast form. You can follow us on Spotify, Apple and all other major podcasting platforms. Each episode is available 12 hours after they first broadcast, live, here on Rumble. And if you rate and review the program, it helps spread the visibility of the show. 

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
17
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
CLIP: Glenn Greenwald Debates Alan Dershowitz on Iran

Glenn warns against waging wars during last week’s debate against Alan Dershowitz on whether the U.S. should strike Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Glenn argues: “We don't go around the world attacking other countries or trying to remove their government because we want to give those people freedom and democracy. We only [attack] when we see a government that doesn't do our bidding."

We are grateful to The Soho Forum and Reason for hosting the spirited debate. You can listen to the full debate here: https://reason.com/podcast/2024/05/24/glenn-greenwald-and-alan-dershowitz-debate-bombing-iran/

00:05:23
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: New Week, New Program

Although Glenn is currently on vacation, SYSTEM UPDATE will continue with the help of talented guest hosts such as Briahna Joy Gray, Michael Tracey, and more.

This post will be pinned to our profile for the remainder of this week, so comment below with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Michael Tracey will host and address a variety of questions in our supporters-only After-Shows sometime this week, so be on the lookout.

Thank you so much for your continued support.

post photo preview

I LIKE MIKE!
I just wanted to express that I like Michael Tracy as a host. I started to appreciate his persona when I saw how he skillfully asked questions at the RNC that would have been greeted with "how dare you ask me this obvious question" when asked by others. The only area of improvement he needs to replace Glenn is he needs work on adding a few 'aaannnnndds'.

The Best of Victor Borge Act One & Two (1990)

My favorite musical comedian when I was young. A class act. - JW

placeholder
post photo preview
Netanyahu's Speech To Congress; PLUS: Max Blumenthal on Israel
Video Transcript

Watch the full episode HERE

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Wednesday, July 24. I'm Michael Tracey, filling in for Glenn Greenwald, who's probably laughing at me, at least in spirit, wherever he may be while he's away. 

Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel – you may have heard of him – was in Washington, DC, today, and delivered another one of his magnificent soaring addresses to a joint session of Congress that predictably evoked mass adulation and euphoria. So, we will review the fallout in graphic and possibly sarcastic detail. 

Next, we will talk to the president of the Heritage Foundation to discuss the much-buzzed-about Project 2025. This is a document that's become a major bone of contention in the 2024 presidential campaign. Already, some aspects of that plan or project that you probably won't hear discussed very much anywhere else in the so-called mainstream media, but I'll take care of that for you. 

And finally, we'll be joined by journalist Max Blumenthal, hopefully well known to many of you out there on the internet who's been surveying the wreckage out there in Washington, DC at the Netanyahu address or in the perimeter anyway, and he'll tell us about all the insane security protocols that I understand have been imposed to ensure a wonderfully smooth visit for the prime minister of our greatest ally, that being the Jewish state. 

For now, welcome to a new edition of System Update, starting right now.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Untangling Fact From Fiction with Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts
Interview

Watch the full episode HERE

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Interview with Kevin Roberts

AD_4nXf3hkpxt9mz1p-oilIW4v4bKngIpj66R-UPd72AEbFevcx4OlBB0CZEfM65fRkgGxDEgjDjUYUdf55lhSD7KFHXjhCBXM6GKISA5mM8FeHtbAfcjLSDDJYvM8eh4FyeLBXKz_bVL0Kz1YkqNkV7LCaW3fWjSC_ic_gX-kSTWA?key=-FmXxAvFVyFH4hlFsGUx6A

And so that's something to perhaps ponder. And, with that, we wanted to move to an interview with the president of the Heritage Foundation, Kevin Roberts, who is somebody of interest, because the Heritage Foundation has been in the news quite a bit recently. The document that the think tank produced, called colloquially and referred to as “Project 2025,” has become a major point of contestation among the Republicans and Democrats as it relates to the 2024 campaign. My working sense is that there are many aspects of that document, which I actually took the liberty of reading. At least large portions of that have not really been discussed much in the so-called mainstream media. So, glad to be joined by, Kevin Roberts. 

 

M. Tracey: Hello, sir. 

 

Kevin Roberts: Michael. Thanks for having me. Looking forward to an intellectually honest conversation. Whatever someone's political beliefs are about “Project 2025.” So, thanks for having me. 

 

M. Tracey: I appreciate that. So, if you listen to the chatter and much of the liberal-oriented media, obviously they've converted Project 2025 into what they think is going to be their gold mine of an attack line against Donald Trump and the Republicans writ large. And, I did something, I guess, a bit unusual by media standards, which is I read the document and there are portions of it that stood out to me as really guiding, getting no discussion whatsoever, at least as far as I've ascertained and those, for me, anyway, have to do with, national security and foreign policy. So, I want to discuss a few of those items with you, if you don't mind. 

AD_4nXfK0h6HJvc9Hu6GqmuQiCexDT_gwENdmCb7EfcjvB_Ayq0sEaD_L4WyQpBPWmXkfdCsbViEVs1kRV8gvq_Fd8FY8_3zyhV2dNLxkINnbjLQO-LpgMjPJYQGTMOlU8GOzpIiCQdiqcHewOpMP_9AyqL_i0Em4XB3kd_CdIv2Iw?key=-FmXxAvFVyFH4hlFsGUx6A

So, obviously, some recommendations are made in terms of how to reorganize the bureaucracy, the federal government, including the intelligence services and one prescription that is made is that section 702 of FISA, the Surveillance Act, ought to be renewed and reauthorized and that's been fairly controversial, including among the right, because, you know, the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant, and this authority is seen as authorizing warrantless surveillance and only barely passed the House in April, in terms of renewal. I think, actually, Speaker Johnson cast the tie-breaking vote in favor of that reauthorization of FISA. So, the section of Project 2025 that I'm referring to here, says that section 702 should be understood as a:

AD_4nXd6IzeCTHbCW8PKXA-2FsXZ6iWEKJqPUbYOMIfiu8CGSRSOVhLeNM3oc3cMFHc6lO59BTB_TY91p345rCAaasqsJ0_EL0OC_FpDe3xyG7bEAq4iqDqSqpLfbC4xiuUbQwtIbGWCWgATdqndVyX1RyjOWIKumuSw6q0nvCfY?key=-FmXxAvFVyFH4hlFsGUx6A

AD_4nXehBGP6VcfwJnaD5PekTYX7QsIvcJ7QwfXHnZKV-aSXacgzGKvlJLxaubCKCorgS4xARYnV-bwUT4VubCnAllVeiaT_Ej4d7x4qCCmRpU6vZ3drN2qavJMzAV8RkOAOnFxrnMhlciBI36UFq4awASDKThM8y8ZCG65aZe2xgw?key=-FmXxAvFVyFH4hlFsGUx6A

And so, it says that these authorizations need to be properly maintained and accountable, but that they should be retained nonetheless. So, what is your sense of what Project 2025 proposes for that particular authority, FISA? It's been controversial throughout the Trump administration. Trump has criticized certain aspects of it as having been abused. But the fundamental authority the document does propose be retained. 

 

Kevin Roberts: Yes. Thanks so much for this conversation. We need to have more discourse like this in the United States, regardless of someone's political beliefs. So, I'm really grateful to answer the question about the policy detail. And, Michael, I'll make two points. One, from the standpoint of Project 2025, what you've read there is what's in the mandate for leadership book “The Conservative Promise,” this conservative policy manual, if you will. And keep in mind, we wrote that two years ago, so well before the most recent vote on the issue. The second point that I'll make is we do believe that the underlying authority of Section 702 should continue to exist, but especially those of us at the Heritage Foundation, which has facilitated this project, believe that there need to be very stringent serious amendments added to that. And so, during the last legislative, In the last legislative fight. Heritage. Of course, just one part of Project 2025, was vocal about some of these amendments being added to the bill so that we could better protect innocent Americans. All of that to say that this has been extended into what would be the next presidential term, and either for Mr. Trump or it looks like, you know, Ms. Harris, the nominee for the left. And I think at that point, we'll have the conversation about making those amendments again so that we can better protect the Fourth Amendment. 

 

M. Tracey:  Because also on the intelligence community, which again, raised a bit of a paradox for me because I've seen a lot of like people who on the right online who are actually in favor of Project 2025, anticipating that what's so great about it is that it will fundamentally overhaul the intelligence services and maybe combat the deep state, which has become a main theme among, you know, among right-wing discourse. And also Donald Trump obviously rails against it because he feels understandably aggrieved by elements of the National Security State that use unprecedented tactics to undermine him, whether it was through the Russia investigation, the Mueller special counsel investigation, etc., in his 2016 campaign. And then also in the early part of his first term, I want to just read a quote here. Here's what Project 2025 prescribes for the intelligence community.

AD_4nXfpd8kUE3a5JJ3qKIWLqpIy9V00-Xu4dS3DIJt-4-vUUmRPrUjjqPQ33NzoIIM9DdHYJMUlAOHLkTxzfZsOAqq9vCxx2tKncGVGdFj7S0kCEvxhJzv1N0QQP9dnV7pQOxTBGggbAdxsMtw3WkQ-x-HGfufxrt1otgd730lj?key=-FmXxAvFVyFH4hlFsGUx6A

That seems like the purpose of these bureaucratic reorganizations that are being proposed is to better entrench American primacy, right?, to better expand American hegemony, and to combat alleged adversaries, which is very much in keeping with the standard mission of the intelligence services. Whatever tweaks you might want to make around the margins of how it's bureaucratically organized, would that be a fair summation? 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Briahna Joy Gray on Dems Against Democracy, Biden's Gaza Problem, Ken Klippenstein: Should Biden Step Down as President?; Michael Tracey Joins as Guest Host
Video Transcript

Watch the full episode HERE

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Tuesday, July 23. Welcome to a new episode of System Update, our live nightly show that airs every Monday to Friday, at 7 p.m. Eastern, exclusively on Rumble, the free speech alternative to YouTube, by your esteemed host, Glenn Greenwald, who is out on vacation this week, and it really is an honor and a pleasure for me to try to fill his very big shoes as guest host today. 

If you're not familiar with me from past appearances on System Update, my name is Briahna Joy Gray, I host my own podcast called “Bad Faith” and until recently co-hosted The Hills show “Rising,” before I was censored for reporting news that was critical of Israel. Prior to my own show, I worked as the national press secretary for the Bernie 2020 campaign, and before that, I worked with Glenn at The Intercept. And like Glenn, I started my career as a lawyer, practicing in New York for about seven years before leaving to become a journalist. So, I felt very supported by Glenn early in my career and considered him to be one of the most ideologically consistent, intelligent, insightful, and courageous voices in the space. So really, it is a pleasure for me to be here with you today. 

Coming up today on the show we’ll be covering the Democrats' anti-democratic maneuvering to oust Biden and replace him with Kamala Harris, and how the group of politicians that sold themselves as the “anti-establishment left” have really shown themselves to be frauds in many respects, especially Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. 

We're also going to assess whether Kamala solves Biden's Gaza problem, that is, his unpopular handling of the war in Palestine, before being joined by independent journalist Ken Klippenstein, who has written a recent Substack post asking whether Joe Biden resign all together now if he’s too unfit to finish out his presidential campaign. 

Stick around after that, because Michael Tracey will be taking over as guest host to conduct an interview with Ro Khanna. I understand Ro Khanna is the first Democrat to come on System Update, so that's bound to be a really good interview.

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals