Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) Lets Americans Drown and Burn Unless Ukraine Gets More Money, Plus: Leading Establishment Critic Jeffrey Sachs on Ukraine, Taiwan, BRICS, and more
Video Transcript
September 04, 2023
post photo preview

Watch the full episode here: 

https://rumble.com/v3dyflm-system-update-show-141.html

 

Good evening. It's Friday, September 1. Welcome to a new episode of System Update, our live nightly show that airs every Monday through Friday at 7 p.m. Eastern, exclusively here on Rumble, the free speech alternative to YouTube.

Tonight: When Donald Trump ran for president in 2016, one of his signature foreign policy arguments was one that polling data has long shown American support, namely, that it is both immoral and a violation of the core duty of the American government to continue to pour billions into wars, regime-change operations, and other obscenely costly imperial projects to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. All while Americans in the United States continue to suffer at home from a deindustrialization heartland, stagnant wages, the inability of millions of American families to raise their children without having both parents work outside the home and lack of reasonable health care, the inability to pay for college and on and on and on. As you know, that turned out to be a winning message as Trump rode that attack on longstanding bipartisan neoconservative orthodoxy all the way to the Republican nomination and ultimately to the Oval Office. It is difficult to think of a more vivid example of the war priorities in Washington than what is happening right now inside the U.S. Senate. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is the federal entity responsible for administering and overseeing disaster relief to American citizens when major destruction ruins or ends their lives, such as the wildfires in Maui, Hawaii, or Hurricane Dorian, in Florida. Because that agency is short on funds at exactly the same time Americans most urgently need it, Republican Senator Rick Scott of Florida urged a quick standalone vote to replenish the federal disaster relief fund so that American citizens – again, the people to whom the U.S. government has its highest responsibility, at least in theory – can obtain the relief they desperately need from these multiple natural disasters. And yet, earlier today, Tammy Duckworth, the Democratic senator from Illinois, announced that she will block this vote unless – and I'm not making this up – that bill also includes $24 billion, which the Biden administration is demanding as the latest sum of unaccounted for largesse that will be lavished on our colonial puppets in Kiev, Ukraine. 

Let me say that again: Tammy Duckworth is refusing to allow disaster relief for American citizens in desperate need of help in the United States unless the bill also includes another $24 billion for Ukraine. 

On CNN, with Jake Tapper this afternoon, the White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, emphasized that the White House fully supports Senator Duckworth's threats. In other words, in the eyes of the DC ruling class, the interest of Ukraine and the Ukrainian government is at least of equal importance to the urgent need of America's own citizens whose lives have just been overturned or worse, by several natural disasters. Indeed, the only logical conclusion one can reach is that the lives of American citizens have a lower priority than the latest demands from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. 

If you're ever wondering why so many Americans despise its ruling class in Washington and are increasingly attracted to the type of foreign policy principles that demand the end of endless wars and the neocon obsession with sending American resources to slaughter and destabilize other countries rather than using their resources to improve the lives of American citizens, just look at what is happening right now, in Washington, and everything will be clear.

Then: Last May, we spoke with Jeffrey Sachs, the long-time Harvard economist who has held numerous powerful positions as part of the Western establishment, going back to the 1980s when he helped Bolivia and then Poland and other countries exit their crisis with debt. Despite that resumé filled with some of the most impressive establishment credentials that exist, Professor Sachs has simultaneously become one of the most emphatic and scathing critics of the foreign policy and global economic dogmas of leading Western institutions. Indeed, he managed to stay inside the establishment while always being a critic of it, and yet now has become an even more scathing one. We reviewed that interview as one of the most interesting that we had and we are thrilled to have him back tonight for a wide-ranging and very enlightening discussion on the war in Ukraine and the latest events there, the U.S. posture toward both Russia and China, how to reconcile America First or other anti-imperialist and anti-militarism policies with the seemingly quite rapid march to a Cold War with China, if not a hot war with them, and the question of whether the so-called BRICS alliance, led by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa that are now expanding to include six more countries, including Saudi Arabia, presents a meaningful threat to the hegemony of Western institutions such as NATO, the G-7 and the World Bank, and whether that alliance poses a real threat to the role of the American dollar as the world's reserve currency. 

Our discussion with him, which we filmed just about an hour ago because of schedule context, was at least as fascinating as the one we did with him in May. It really is remarkable that someone who has been on the inside of institutional power for so long is simultaneously now one of the most independent, informed and important voices of dissent. We are glad he is and are thrilled to show you our discussion with him. 

As a few programming notes, we are encouraging our audience to download the Rumble app, which works both on your phone and your smart TV. Doing that will enable you to follow programs on Rumble, including this one, and get notifications the minute the program starts to stream online. That will enable you on the very rare occasion that we start a few minutes late to be immediately notified when we do, or other shows do as well. And it will enable you to encourage other people to download the app and help our program, as well as Rumble. 

As another reminder, System Update is also available in podcast form. You can find each episode 12 hours after it is first broadcast live here on Rumble. You can find it on all major podcasting platforms, including Spotify and Apple. If you follow, rate and review the show, it really helps boost the program's visibility. 

Finally, as we do and every Tuesday and Thursday night, as soon as we're done with our one-hour live show here on Rumble, we move to Locals for our interactive aftershow, to take your questions comment on your feedback and hear your suggestions for guests and topics. That aftershow, every Tuesday and Thursday night, is for members of our Locals community only, who also have access to the show's transcripts that we publish each day and deliver to your inbox. We also have original journalism we published there and becoming a member of our Locals community helps support the independent journalism that we do here. 

So, to become a member of our community, simply click the join button right below the video player here, on the Rumble page, and that will take you directly to that site.

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
13
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: Another Week Another News Cycle

What’s happening in politics that you want to talk about? Are there any burning topics you think Glenn needs to cover? Any thoughts you’d like to share?

This post will be pinned to our profile for the remainder of this week, so comment below anytime with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Glenn will respond to a few comments here—and may even address some on our next supporters-only After Show.

Thank you so much for your continued support through another week of SYSTEM UPDATE with Glenn Greenwald!

Let's have a great week everyone!

🏆Dog-of-the-Week:

Dog-of-the-Week goes to TOBY. Our well-groomed cohost kept Victor company as Glenn responded to the Locals community questions.

20 hours ago

https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4646417-top-senators-believe-the-us-secretly-recovered-ufos/

Mother of all conspiracy theories is that we could be off of fossil fuels. For decades technologies that provide abundant FREE energy have been suppressed. Zero point energy aka anti-gravity technologies have been known and they come from ET civilizations. Petro-nazi's (big oil) has spent huge amount of efforts to keep the public confused about the truth.

Neocons continue to neocon. Lindsey Graham suggests using nukes on Gaza. Nevermind the fact that Israel is down wind from the blast zone and some settlements might be caught up in it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/sen-graham-says-israel-should-do-whatever-it-needs-to-do-to-survive-compares-war-in-gaza-to-wwii-210757189861

post photo preview
As the Daily Wire Publicly Negotiated a Debate with Candace Owens, it Secretly Sought -- and Obtained -- a Gag Order Against Her
Due to a prior restraint order against Owens, the much-anticipated Israel debate with Ben Shapiro appears to be off.

On April 5, Candace Owens publicly invited her former Daily Wire colleague Ben Shapiro to a debate about "Israel and the current definition of antisemitism." It was Owens' criticisms of U.S. financing of Israel, and her criticisms of Israel's war in Gaza, that caused her departure from the Daily Wire two weeks earlier.

Both Shapiro and Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing responded by saying they would like to arrange the debate requested by Owens. That night, Shapiro appeared to accept her offer, writing on X: "Sure, Candace. I texted you on February 29th offering this very thing." The Daily Wire co-founder added: "Let's do it on my show this Monday at 5pm at our studios in Nashville; 90 minutes, live-streamed."

After Owens objected to the format and timing, she and Boreing exchanged several tweets in which they appeared to be negotiating, and then agreeing to, the terms and format for the debate. Owens had suggested the debate be moderated by Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman. Shaprio said he wanted no moderator. They ultimately agreed to the terms, with Boreing offering a series of conditions, including a no-moderator debate, and with Owens publicly accepting

Two weeks later, many readers of both Shapiro and Owens noticed, and complained, that the debate had not yet happened. On April 24, Owens addressed those inquiries by explaining that the Daily Wire had yet to propose dates, while reiterating her strong desire to ensure the debate happened.

But the debate was never going to happen. That is because the Daily Wire -- in secret and unbeknownst to its readers -- sought a gag order to be placed on Owens after she had called for a debate. They did this under the cover of secrecy, before a private arbitrator, at exactly the same time that they were claiming in public that they wanted this debate and were even negotiating the terms with her. To this date, the Daily Wire has not informed its readers, seeking to understand why the much-anticipated debate had not yet happened, that they had sought and obtained a gag order against Owens.

When seeking a gag order to be imposed on Owens, the Daily Wire accused her of violating the non-disparagement clause of her agreement with the company. To substantiate this accusation, the company specifically cited Owens' initial tweet requesting a debate with Shapiro as proof of this disparagement, along with concerns she voiced that Shapiro appeared to be violating the confidentiality agreement between them by publicly maligning Owens's views to explain her departure from the company. While the company claimed before the arbitrator that it did not object in principle to a "healthy debate," it urged the imposition of a gag order on Owens by claiming that the way she requested the debate constituted disparagement of Shapiro and the site.

To justify the gag order it wanted, the company also cited various criticisms of the Daily Wire and Shapiro on X that Owens had "liked." This proceeding took place as part of an exchange of legal threats between the parties after the public agreement to debate about Israel was solidified. Those threats arose from the fact that various Daily Wire executives and hosts, in both public and private, were castigating Owens as an anti-Semite. On March 22, Daily Wire host Andrew Klaven published a one-hour video that hurled multiple accusations, including anti-Semitism, at Owens. The Daily Wire cited Owens' response to that video -- her defense of herself from those multiple accusations -- as further proof that she needed to be gagged.

The initial tweet from Owens not only requested a debate, but also included a video from the popular comedian Andrew Schulz, who had mocked the Daily Wire for firing Owens over disagreements regarding Israel, and specifically mocked Shapiro for his willingness to debate only undergraduate students. The tweet underneath Owens's original debate request included a summary of Schulz's mockery of Shapiro which stated: Schulz now "realizes Ben Shapiro is only good at debating college liberals & can’t win debates against serious competition." 

After the prior restraint hearing sought by the Daily Wire and Shapiro, the arbitrator sided with them and against Owens. The arbitrator agreed with the Daily Wire that Owens' call to debate Shapiro, and her follow-up negotiations of the debate, constituted "disparagement" of the company and Shapiro. The company argued that any further attempt by Owens to debate, as well her suggesting that the debate would expose the Daily Wire's real "priorities," constituted criticisms of the site and of Shapiro, criticisms that the arbitrator concluded Owens was barred from expressing under her contract with the company.

The arbitrator thus imposed a gag order of prior restraint on Owens. Among other things, the order banned Owens from saying or doing anything in the future which could tarnish or harm the reputation of the Daily Wire and/or Ben Shapiro. Given that the Daily Wire had argued, and the arbitrator agreed, that Owens' offers to debate Shapiro about Israel and anti-semitism were themselves "disparaging," the Daily Wire has ensured that the debate with Owens that they publicly claimed to want could not, in fact, take place. Any such debate would be in conflict with the gag order they obtained on Owens from expressing any criticisms of the site or of Shapiro.

When asked for comment to be included this story, Owens replied: I "wish I could comment on this but I can’t." She added: "can neither confirm nor deny."

Boreing said: "your story is inaccurate to the point of being false," though he did not specify a single inaccuracy, nor did he deny that the Daily Wire had sought and obtained a gag order on Owens at the same time they were publicly posturing as wanting a debate with her. The confirmation we obtained of all these facts is indisputable. Boreing added: "I’m sure you can appreciate how fraught a high profile break-up like this is. For that reason, we are trying to resolve our issues with Candace privately."

It certainly seems true that the Daily Wire is attempting to achieve all of this "privately." Nonetheless, Ben Shapiro has constructed his very lucrative media brand and persona based on his supposed superiority in debating, a reputation cultivated largely as a result of numerous appearances at undergraduate schools around the country where he intrepidly engages with students who are often in their teens or early twenties. Both Shapiro and the Daily Wire have also predicated their collective media brand on an eagerness to engage in free and open debate with anyone, and to vehemently oppose any efforts to silence people, especially those in media, from expressing their political views.

It was the imperatives of this media branding that presumably led the Daily Wire and Shapiro to publicly agree to a debate with Owens over Israel and anti-semitism in the first place. Indeed, when it became apparent early after the start of Israel's war in Gaza that Owens had major differences with Shapiro, Boering responded to calls from Israel supporters for Owens to be fired by proclaiming in November: 

[E]ven if we could, we would not fire Candace because of another thing we have in common - a desire not to regulate the speech of our hosts, even when we disagree with them. Candace is paid to give her opinion, not mine or Ben’s. Unless those opinions run afoul of the law or she violates the terms of her contract in some way, her job is secure and she is welcome at Daily Wire.

But a mere four months later, Owens, despite being of one of the company's most popular hosts, was out. The company had concluded that her increasingly vocal criticisms of Israel, opposition to U.S. financing of it, and her views on anti-semitism were incompatible with the Daily Wire's policies.

All of those issues would likely have been the subject of the public debate that Owens sought, and that the Daily Wire claimed to want. Instead, the Daily Wire has succeeded in obtaining a gag order that, on its face, prevents Owens, in advance, from questioning or criticizing both the Daily Wire or Shapiro in any way.

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
THE WEEKLY UPDATE: MAY 6-10
Weekly Newsletter

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week on SYSTEM UPDATE. 

—Glenn Greenwald

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
SYSTEM UPDATE RECAP: May 6-10
Weekly Recap

Welcome to the SYSTEM UPDATE recap, your weekend digest featuring everything we’ve covered throughout the previous week. 

Prefer to listen to your daily news analysis? Reminder that FULL episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE are available anywhere you listen to podcasts🎙️

Enjoy!


MONDAY, MAY 6 - EPISODE 267

Russia-Ukraine War Escalates Amid Nuclear Threats, Israel Was Motive Behind TikTok Ban; PLUS: Batya Ungar-Sargon on New Book 

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (7:26)

Dangerous Escalation Threats (12:46)

Pro-Israel Repression (38:06)

Interview with Batya Ungar-Sargon (52:40)

Outro (1:39:02)

 

TUESDAY, MAY 7 - EPISODE 268

TikTok Constitutionally Challenges Forced Sale, Lawmakers Exploit Holocaust to Feed Moral Panic over Antisemitism; PLUS: The Ozempic Craze with author Johann Hari

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (9:09)

TikTok Ban (15:29)

Antisemitism Moral Panic (41:30)

Interview with Johann Hari (55:55)

Outro (1:23:15)

 

Supporters-Only After Show for Tuesday, May 7

We moved to Locals for our supporters-only, interactive after show where Glenn shared his thoughts on some audience questions and comments:

 

First, Glenn reveals his thoughts on the 2024 Pulitzer Prize winners. 

 

@JJohnx

Johann Hari was infamously involved in a plagiarism/Wikipedia attack on colleagues a number of years back. Does Glenn believe that JH has moved on from this and paid the price. Because I first became aware of him at the time of this scandal, rightly or wrongly, I find it difficult to listen without alarm bells ringing as it were.

 

Available for paid supporters here

Want to join us every Tuesday and Thursday for this supporter-exclusive, live after show? Become a paid supporter here!

 

FRIDAY, MAY 10

Rumble Live: Defending Your Human Right to Freedom of Expression

Glenn Greenwald joins Rumble Live in Toronto to discuss the importance of defending the human right to freedom of expression as Canada prepares to enact the restrictive “Online Harms Act.” 


WATCH THE SPEECH

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals