Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Culture • Writing
THE WEEKLY UPDATE: JAN 15-19
Weekly Newsletter
January 21, 2024
post photo preview

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week. These are written versions of the reporting and analysis we did on last week's episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE.

—Glenn Greenwald


MONDAY, JANUARY 15 - SYSTEM UPDATE 211

Iowa Caucus Kicks Off Primary Season—w/ Michael Tracey LIVE from Iowa

As the Iowa Caucuses get underway, officially kicking off the 2024 electoral season, our intrepid correspondent Michael Tracey braves the freezing temperatures to tell us the mood on the ground, directly from a caucus precinct. 

The first actual votes in the 2024 presidential race have been counted, as Iowa held Republican caucuses around the state on Monday night. That means that the all-out establishment war to prevent Donald Trump from being re-elected president officially begins tonight. For now, the principal establishment weapon against him is the campaign of Nikki Haley, who more and more Democrats are now openly and enthusiastically supporting – not on the ground that she would be the weakest opponent for Joe Biden, but rather on the ground that she's so clearly the superior Republican candidate that, for the good of the country – as liberals and their neocon allies see it – Americans are duty-bound to vote for her.

The war to destroy Trump extends far beyond Nikki Haley, needless to say. It includes four separate criminal proceedings to try to render him a felon and imprison him, and more than a dozen legal processes to ban him from appearing on the ballot and thus dispensing altogether with the need to persuade Americans not to vote for him. But for tonight, the establishment hope is that it has breathed enough life – and cash – into Nikki Haley's campaign that she will leave Iowa and head to New Hampshire as the clear and sole Republican alternative to the Orange Hitler. (Spoiler Alert: She didn’t.)

One of the best decisions we ever made as a program was reading weather reports last week that warned one of the most severe blizzards and cold spells in Iowa’s history would be happening throughout this week, and thereafter, calling up the intrepid independent journalist Michael Tracey to cover the Iowa caucuses for us. Michael joined us on Friday night last week from Des Moines and is still suffering intensely under an ongoing cold spell – beyond that entertaining spectacle – he'll join us tonight to tell us the latest on what he's seen and heard over the last few days and what it presages for tonight.

 

READ THE FULL STORY: Part 1 & Part 2

WATCH THE EPISODE


TUESDAY, JANUARY 16 - SYSTEM UPDATE 212

Trump’s Iowa Victory Exposes Major Establishment Weakness. 

 

Zelensky Brings Pathetic Peace Plan to Davos. 

 

The Revealing Case of Rep. Paul Findley (R-IL)

Despite what the establishment could throw at him, Trump scores a historic win in Iowa; Zelenksy presents a pathetic peace plan in Davos; The story of Rep. Paul Findley – and what it tells us about American politics.

Donald Trump won the Iowa Caucus by 30 points over Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley, in what is the largest-ever victory in a contested Republican Iowa race since the causes began. I believe it is insufficiently recognized how remarkable this victory is, and how singularly revealing. It is not just that the entire political, media, and financial establishment is united to stop Trump, though that is largely true. It is far more than that: establishment forces unleashed on Trump a weapon that had never previously been used on a major candidate for the presidency: they formally charged him with felonies, and are trying to imprison him – four separate times, in four separate criminal proceedings.

And yet very large swaths of the public simply do not care – obviously. And it is not just Republicans but independents as well, who continue to give Trump a meaningful lead in the key swing states that will determine the election. Put another way, this means that many millions of Americans – arguably most – simply no longer trust the core institutions of power and authority in this country. That is not a healthy state of affairs, but it is a very well-deserved one. 

PLUS: European, American, and Persian Gulf elites are meeting this week in their annual glamor fest at Davos. Among the attendees is Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, who traveled there and appeared in what the New York Times described as a stylish, smart, war-general-chic "olive green pants and a black crew-neck sweater." 

He did not only appear in his war General costume. He brought with him what he is calling a "peace plan": a proposal that is supposedly going to induce Moscow to stop the war that is so delusional, out-of-touch, and detached from reality that you have to see it to believe it, so we will show it to you. This war is one of the most horrific wastes of money and human life, and the fact that the West is still entertaining the possibility of funding this futile bloodbath shows how decayed and rotted the Davos elite has become.

ALSO: We take a look back at the fascinating career of a Republican Congressman. First elected in 1960 to represent a moderate district in Illinois, he became one of the earliest opponents of US intervention in Vietnam. As a result, he authored the War Powers Resolution – the bill that curbs the ability of the president to deploy the US military to fight wars without Congressional approval: a law that was much discussed last week after Biden ordered the bombing of Yemen without so much as a Congressional notification, let alone a debate or a vote.

What makes this Congressman – Paul Findley – particularly notable is not just how he spent his career but also how it ended. He not only opposed US intervention in general but was a specific and increasingly vehement opponent of US funding of Israel and its various wars. For that crime, he was accused by AIPAC, the ADL, and other vehement defenders of Israel as being anti-Semitic, and was targeted by the pro-Israel lobby with defeat. 

In 1982 – after he had served for 22 years – AIPAC funded a young Democrat who was highly supportive of Israel. His name is Dick Durbin, and he went on to become one of the Democratic Party's most senior and most powerful US Senators and one of the most reliable supporters of US funding of Israel. The case of Paul Findley was one of the first – but by no means the last – that sent a clear signal to American lawmakers: either unquestioningly support Israel and vote for US funding of it, or face likely career destruction

 

READ THE FULL STORY: Part 1 & Part 2

WATCH THE EPISODE


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17 - SYSTEM UPDATE 213

Speaker Johnson & Biden Open War Over Ukraine/Border

 

Corrupt Congress Outperforms S&P 500

 

As Gaza Is Destroyed, Concern Trolling over LGBT Issues

 

Hunter Biden Laptop Confirmed (Again)

 

Britain to Investigate Palestinian Activist

President Biden and Speaker Johnson battle over House demand for border funding; Genius traders in Congress outperform the market (again); Israel defenders abuse “LGBT rights” to coerce support for Israel's total destruction of Gaza; Biden DOJ adds to piles of proof of Hunter laptop authenticity; London Police investigate Palestinian activist.

The Biden White House, for months now, has been desperately seeking to wrangle another $60 billion out of the U.S. Congress to send to their friends and allies in Ukraine. But for the first time since this branch of that war began two years ago, large sectors of the American public – along with many European nations – have decisively turned against further funding of this bloody yet futile war. House Republicans, led by their new Speaker Mike Johnson, have been adamant that no new funding for Ukraine will be authorized – let alone another $60 billion, which would be the largest authorization yet – without several conditions being met, chief among them real steps to first secure the American border before the Ukrainian border is secured, as well as meaningful oversight measures to monitor and control how those billions of dollars sent to Kiev are being used.

This week, Speaker Johnson went to the White House with other top House Republicans to meet with President Biden. By all accounts – including that provided by the Speaker immediately after he left – the two sides remain far apart, evidently unable to reach an agreement that would keep the war in Ukraine funded. We will report on the latest, and show you the Speaker’s comments, as Biden’s quest to keep this war funded with American resources is – at least for the moment – still being impeded. 

PLUS: The Israeli destruction of Gaza continues, though there is no problem there when it comes to the flow of US dollars to Tel Aviv – largely because Biden has been willing to resort to clearly illegal means to keep the flow of American weapons to Israel without any congressional approval. We will show you the latest independent data that demonstrates the unparalleled nature of the destruction of civilian life there, including the very real risk – one might say the probability – that tens of thousands of Gazans will imminently die not from bombs alone but – due to the full-scale and ongoing Israeli blockade – also from a combination of hunger and treatable infections. 

Our view since the start of the war has been the same: regardless of your views of this war, the fact that the US Government is financing and arming Israel, at great cost to both the country and its citizens, requires that everyone know what is actually being done there. 

And we'll also examine one of the most common, and most cynical, rhetorical tactics for justifying the war in the eyes of Westerners: namely, arguing that because Hamas is vehemently anti-LGBT, people in the West – especially gay people – should consider this war against Hamas particularly just. That is an argument as corrosive and as disingenuous – given how commonly wielded it is. We'll briefly examine the reasons why. 

ALSO: We will take a look at a new report that documents the amazing streak of luck members of Congress have had in trading stocks – with profits that significantly exceed the market – has continued for 2023. Produced by an anonymous but highly reliable independent data journalist, the report details how many members of Congress are now following in the footsteps of Nancy Pelosi and exhibiting remarkable skill and luck with buying and selling at exactly the right time to maximize their profits

THEN: New proof – this time from the US Government – that the Hunter Biden laptop was authentic all along. I continue to regard this as one of the worst media scandals in recent times: that most of the corporate media spread a CIA lie right before the 2020 election – that the materials on that laptop were not real but rather "Russian disinformation" – and every time there's new proof that it's real, and every time the media refugees to retract their story – like now – it's evidence that hatred for the corporate media is not only justified and well-earned but vital.

AND: The Metropolitan Police of London issued a chilling statement – one that could only be found, by definition, in an authoritarian country. It announced the commencement of a criminal investigation due to a speech that someone gave at a peaceful anti-war protest in London on Saturday. The speech, like the protest, was aimed at denouncing the now 100-day-old Israeli destruction of Gaza. Many claimed that the speech was intended to express support for the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas. The speech plainly did not do that – as we'll show you – but even if it had, free speech clearly entails the right to defend violence. That's why people can urge that Iran be bombed off the map, or that Yemen be attacked by US aircraft, or that Gaza be flattened and turned into a parking lot by Israel. 

Yet because the target of the criticism here was Israel – not Iran or Yemen or Gaza – many demanded that the police arrest the speaker. Yet again, we see a severe and rapid erosion of core free speech rights in the West, all in order to protect this foreign country.

 

READ THE FULL STORY: PART 1 & PART 2

WATCH THE EPISODE


THURSDAY, JANUARY 18 - SYSTEM UPDATE 214

Saifedean Ammous on Trump’s Vow to “Never Allow” Central Bank Digital Currencies – Why Should You Care?

 

Biden’s Illegal Bombing in Yemen Escalates

 

The 2nd Gentleman, in Davos, Speaks on American Jews’ Hardships

After Trump pledged to block the creation of CBDCs; Expert Saifedean Ammous examines and explains the importance of this statement; Biden expands the illegal bombing of Yemen, threatening a broader war; In Davos, Second Gentleman Doug Ermhoff laments the plight of American Jews.

After Vivek Ramaswamy dropped out of the presidential race, one of the first things he did was endorse Donald Trump. Ramaswamy appeared at an event with Trump to announce his endorsement, and he then went on Fox News, where Jesse Water asked him: what did you discuss with Trump? Ramaswamy said he focused on policy discussions, and named two policies he urged Trump to adopt: one was a day-1 pardon of Julian Assange, and the other was opposition to a central bank digital currency.

After Vivek spoke at the event, Trump appeared, and one of the things he said – for the first time – was this: "As your president, I will never allow the creation of a central bank digital currency.” Given that this issue has now been elevated to a presidential vow, we thought it was important to dig into its implications and why it matters. We will speak to Saifedean Ammous, who was a long-time professor of Economics at the Lebanese American University and is the author of The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking.

PLUS: Joe Biden last week ordered that various targets in Yemen be bombed, as retaliation for the attacks on various ships in the Red Sea by the Houthis, the militia that runs Yemen. Those attacks, in turn, were motivated by the Houthis' desire to punish the countries responsible for the destruction of Gaza, particularly the U.S. and Israel. While the Yemeni attacks did not kill anyone, they have caused commercial disruption. That meant that many Americans, including many conservatives, supported Biden's decision to bomb.

One of the primary problems with that decision – as we documented last week – is that it was undertaken without congressional authorization. As we illustrated, presidents – absent some emergency clearly not present here – do not have the power to start new wars without first obtaining the authorization of Congress, and there are good reasons for it, including the fact that such wars are often implemented with no clear plan, no defined mission, no metric for success, and thus often lead to the kind of meandering, endless wars that the U.S. has found itself in so many times over the past several decades.

Since that initial bombing of Yemen, the U.S. has bombed Yemen at least three additional times, including yesterday. The Biden administration has still not bothered to explain its rationale or objectives to Congress, let alone to seek or obtain its approval. When asked today about all of this, Joe Biden gave an answer that could not have more perfectly illustrated why these kinds of bombing campaigns with no public debate or authorization are so dangerous, and we will show all of this to you.

THEN: The husband of Vice President Kamala Harris is Doug Emhoff. He made an appearance yesterday at the ongoing conference of global elites in Davos. While there, he used his time to speak on the grave plight of American Jews, a group – he said – that faces extreme hardship and deprivations in the United States. He also lamented the fact that at the time when American Jews felt most alone and vulnerable – namely after October 7 – far too many Americans proved that they were no friends of the Jews: meaning that too many Americans failed to stand and support Israel in its war against Gaza. 

It has been fascinating to watch over the last four months as the same minority-group victimhood narrative that so often provoked cynicism and scorn when invoked by other groups, has now been repeatedly marshaled in favor of this one group. We'll examine the comments of the Second Gentleman in Davos and what they mean.

 

READ THE FULL STORY: PART 1 & PART 2

WATCH THE EPISODE

community logo
Join the Glenn Greenwald Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Answering Your Questions About Tariffs

Many of you have been asking about the impact of Trump's tariffs, and Glenn addressed how we are covering the issue during our mail bag segment yesterday. As always, we are grateful for your thought-provoking questions! Thank you, and keep the questions coming!

00:11:10
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Breaks Down Trump's DOJ Speech on Fox News
00:04:52
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Discusses Mahmoud Khalil on Fox News
00:08:35
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
QUICK: Ask Questions for Today's Mailbag!

Glenn will be discussing the Israel-Iran conflict and a Trump Administration official who is in an awkward political predicament, so questions on other topics are more likely to be chosen.

Seymour Hersh said the US will commence action this weekend.
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/what-i-have-been-told-is-coming-in

Cool Episode of ‘The Why Files’……

post photo preview
U.S. and Israel vs Iran: Repeating War on Iraq Scripts; Overwhelming Bipartisan Consensus for Israel's Wars
System Update #469

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXeYkVcgzcgVgwTH4HsgQ-PsjfJnkkerEMKzJUBNbex49ctiCfUGCSwgs9h6Vn3qKESfxyvgEpfVQz8nobvNvfVrE9z8iBrAZvKRdf7iPZ-2Qov6I426kA0Sqc0Yy6Oh5amLisL1-RzSK5ykf5mGHyE?key=aMiM9imCrTsNamRKd6Vfew

The war initiated by Israel against Iran last Thursday was dangerous from the start and has each day only become more dangerous. President Trump has boasted of his pre-war coordination with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He's already been using U.S. military assets to protect Israel. He's now even re-deploying aircraft carriers in the Pacific, where we're told they are guarding against America's greatest enemy – China – now to the Middle East, where Israel has demanded they go to support its war. 

Just a few minutes ago, President Trump ordered the 16 million people who live in Tehran to immediately evacuate a city where it's now 2 a.m. 

With Israel, as always, demanding more. Now, they want the U.S. planes and bombs to destroy Iran's underground nuclear facilities for them. The former Israeli defense minister went on CNN just an hour ago and told President Trump in the U.S. that it's our obligation to fight this war with them. And for them, President Trump has repeatedly opened the possibility of even greater U.S. involvement in the war. 

There are so many aspects of this new conflict worth covering and dissecting –and we will do so throughout the week – but tonight we want to focus on the amazing ease the U.S. government has in convincing its population to support whatever new war is presented to it. Over four years ago, intense war propaganda from the U.S. political class and media persuaded Americans to want to fund and arm the war in Ukraine – a war that is still dragging on with no favorable end in sight – and overnight huge numbers of people in the United States have suddenly become convinced without having ever said so previously that war with Iran is some sort of moral imperative as well as a strategic necessity for the survival of American citizens of the United States. 

No matter how debunked, discredited and disgraced that Iraq war narrative has become, as long as one just waits 20 or 25 years, then, apparently, that same script just works like magic all over again. You just haul it out, fearmongering, and huge numbers of people respond by saying, "Yes, let's go to war, let' kill people." 

We'll examine all of that, as well as the standard bipartisan unity in support of new American wars and especially wars involving Israel, you hear Democrats almost unanimously, either staying quiet or praising President Trump, with just a few exceptions from both parties. And we'll look at that as well. 

AD_4nXeYkVcgzcgVgwTH4HsgQ-PsjfJnkkerEMKzJUBNbex49ctiCfUGCSwgs9h6Vn3qKESfxyvgEpfVQz8nobvNvfVrE9z8iBrAZvKRdf7iPZ-2Qov6I426kA0Sqc0Yy6Oh5amLisL1-RzSK5ykf5mGHyE?key=aMiM9imCrTsNamRKd6Vfew

AD_4nXdXi3PHhIfI5UY5jue2s_VN_Dre1s5GH_qzxPS39EBWpyASwtOnszEASDMpdRuJzVlrD4idh5uDoPcdU38-w-kpHnSvAo9rtxSpcN4lW-sAiALyp2wxVRGqfHoLUqaYrKPxb_-HZMv3-aKzQLw90g?key=aMiM9imCrTsNamRKd6Vfew

If you're an American citizen as an adult, you have seen the United States repeatedly go to war. Anyone 18 or over has seen the United States involved in all sorts of wars and that's after the Iraq war, which is now 22 years ago. Essentially, if you're American, it means forever, for a long, long time, for many decades, that you are a citizen of a country that's always at war. 

After World War II, there was a very visible and clear pattern, which is that the U.S. government convinces its citizens, enough of them, to support the war at the beginning. They deluge them with war propaganda, which is extremely strong, primal, tribal and enough Americans initially support the war to let the U.S. government politically go and drop bombs or finance some other country to go drop bombs for it. Then, after six months, a year, or two years, or four years, polls show that Americans overwhelmingly oppose the war that they were convinced to support. Going back to the war in Vietnam, throughout the 1980s’ wars, the War on Terror in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Syria, in Libya, the financing of the war in Ukraine, Israel's destruction of Gaza, bombing Yemin and now this new war that the United States is becoming increasingly involved in, in lots of different ways and we're only on the fifth day.

You just see so many Americans on a dime the minute a new war is presented to them, with whatever pretext can be conjured, even if they're exactly the same pretext that most Americans lived through watching proved to be complete lies the last time it was used in 2003, even though it's exactly the same script, exactly the same pretext, coming from exactly the same people. You can get enough Americans to immediately stand up and start cheering for death and destruction and bombing. Not all, a very substantial minority oppose it, I think if the U.S. overtly gets even more involved in the war in Iran, obviously anything resembling ground troops entering Iran, but even perhaps prolonged bombing of Iran as well through U.S. jets and bombs, as President Trump has indicated and Israel has demanded, maybe some of that will erode, that support will erode. But all that's needed is enough support at the beginning of the war to let the government start it. And once the U.S. government enters the war, it doesn't matter anymore whether the people continue to support it; then it's just already done. All the normal arguments are assembled about why we can't stop, why we can't cut and run, why that would be appeasement, etc., etc. All the same scripts all the time, used over and over, and even though they get proven to be discredited, or unpersuasive, or full of lies, you just use the same ones each time. And that's how the United States stays as a country at war.

We've been hearing a lot of people saying, “Look, I'm happy that Israel is bombing Iran, as long as the U.S. has no involvement in the war, we don't enter it, we don't have to pay for it. As long as it's not our war, I'm fine with it.” But, of course, the entire Israeli military is funded by American taxpayers. Every time Israel has a new war, the weapons that it uses come from the United States, transferred to Israel. We pay for their wars, we arm their wars, we support diplomatically those wars and we use our military assets every single time and our intelligence apparatus to support and enable the war, as the United States is already doing. We already have multiple new U.S. military assets ordered to the region by President Trump. They're already active in protecting Israel from retaliation. President Trump openly said that he is considering the possibility of involving the U.S. even more directly in this war with Iran: "We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved," the president said. (ABC News. June 15, 2025.)

That all depends on what you mean by ‘involved.’ We're paying for the war, we're arming the war, we've deployed military assets that are actively now trying to shoot down missiles coming from Iran as retaliation for the Israelis launching a completely unprovoked attack on Iran, based on the claim that Iran was about to get nuclear weapons, just weeks away, something they've been saying for 30 years, as we've shown you many times, same thing that was said in 2002. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
U.S. Involvement in Israel's Iran Attack; the View from Tehran: Iranian Professor on Reactions to Strikes; CATO Analysts on Dangers and War Escalations

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXd1VoS9xg7si8ZviLBfSqd9c5_FMQdODz9RYxLWVBvtebHFOs0oWtttaWP_7qvL_VZdS0enruALLjYbkU-CdLQUDxNECHRbc5Y9OjrLuK-6y6Uq602-Q9fTzTYkN5_S0oVACoqvAhTWU86eCRc8vZU?key=lmRJixp6Jlz5wRA3fSBDAg

Today's most important news is obvious: Israel last night launched a major military assault on Iran, targeting residential buildings in Tehran, where military commanders and nuclear physicists live with their families, as well as bombing multiple nuclear facilities throughout the country. 

Triumphalist rhetoric flooded American and Israeli discourse almost immediately, until just a little bit ago, when a barrage of Iran's ballistic and hypersonic missiles began hitting Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and other major population centers. Escalation seems virtually inevitable at this point. The level of escalation – always the most dangerous question when a new war has started – is most certainly yet to be determined. 

Then there's the question of the role of the United States and President Trump in all of this. News reports from both the U.S. and Israeli media suggested this morning that Trump was working hand-in-hand with the Israelis to pretend that he was still optimistic about a diplomatic resolution with Tehran, but did so only as a ruse to convince the Iranians that Trump intended to restrain Israel and thus lure Iran into a false sense of security when, in fact, Trump was not only green-lighting the attack but actively working with the Israelis to launch it. President Trump's own statements today proudly boasting of the success of the attack, along with his own concrete actions such as ordering U.S. military assets into position to yet again defend Israel, strongly bolster those reports and clearly indicate a direct U.S. involvement in this war between Israel and Iran, a U.S. involvement that already exists and will almost certainly continue to grow over the next few days and perhaps few weeks and even months. 

We’ll speak to Professor Mohammad Marandi, who is in Tehran and has heard and witnessed a lot of what happened but also has some unique analysis from his role as an American Iranian scholar of foreign policy and to scholars Justin Logan and Jon Hoffman, from the Cato Institute, one of the very few think tanks in the United States, which has long counselled restraint and non-interventionism in U.S. foreign policy. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Federal Court Dismisses & Mocks Lawsuit Brought by Pro-Israel UPenn Student; Dave Portnoy, Crusader Against Cancel Culture, Demands No More Jokes About Jews; Trump's Push to Ban Flag Burning
System Update #466

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXejs0DWGiP8ieMfNSDSHxWeGpA0bYQ2sB6GX53BerQgLDbevN48qlCXkh11p78EUWG7xmSLMCw_dta-m52iwfsgIA3W2CeT9zra6jIl7Krf7sFz7NI2c-vDb2dnkU0ifL9MRhw4ltCOYIB3YKvkIQQ?key=UyjQkErH6uhdu9Xo5Lcq4g

In the first segment, we’ll talk about the victimhood narrative that holds that American Jews, in general, and Jewish students on college campuses in particular, are uniquely threatened, marginalized and endangered. One of the faces of this student victimhood narrative has become Eyal Yakoby, who is a vocal pro-Israel activist and a student at the University of Pennsylvania. 

In 2024, he was invited by House Republicans to stand next to House Speaker Mike Johnson and he proclaimed: I do not feel safe. He said it over and over. “I do not feel safe” has kind of become the motto for his adult life. Now, he seized on those opportunities by initiating a lawsuit against the University of Pennsylvania seeking damages for what he said was the school's failure to fulfill its duties to keep him safe. Mind you, he was never physically attacked, never physically menaced, never physically threatened, but nonetheless claimed that the school had failed to keep him safe and told the congress in the country that he did not feel safe. 

The federal judge who is presiding over his lawsuit, who just happens to be a Jewish judge, a conservative judge, appointed by George W. Bush, not only dismissed Yakoby's lawsuit as without any basis, but really viciously mocked it, depicting his claims as a little more than petulant entitled demands from a privileged Ivy League student who wants to not be exposed to any ideas or political activism that might upset him – sort of depicting him as the Princess in “The Princess and the Pea,” Andersen’s literary fairytale about a princess who's so sensitive to anything that might concern her, that she's even unable to sleep if there's a pea buried beneath the seventeenth mattress on which she sleeps. 

This judicial decision is worth examining not only for the schadenfreude of watching one of America's whiniest pro-Israel activists be exposed as a self-interested fraud that he is, but also for what it says about the broader narrative that has been so relentlessly pushed and so endlessly exploited from so many corners, insisting that the supreme victim group of the United States is, of all people, American Jews. 

Then: speaking of extreme entitlement, Barstool founder Dave Portnoy made quite a name for himself over many years by ranting against the evils of cancel culture, championing the virtues of free speech, and viciously mocking as snowflakes and as people who are far too sensitive anyone who takes offense at jokes, offensive jokes told by comedians. That is what made it so odd – yet so telling – when this weekend we watched the very same Dave Portnoy viciously berated one of his employees for disagreeing with Portnoy's insistence that while jokes about everyone and every group continue to be appropriate, there must now be one exception: namely, according to Portnoy, jokes about Portnoy's own group,  American Jews,  must now be suspended and deemed too dangerous to permit. 

AD_4nXejs0DWGiP8ieMfNSDSHxWeGpA0bYQ2sB6GX53BerQgLDbevN48qlCXkh11p78EUWG7xmSLMCw_dta-m52iwfsgIA3W2CeT9zra6jIl7Krf7sFz7NI2c-vDb2dnkU0ifL9MRhw4ltCOYIB3YKvkIQQ?key=UyjQkErH6uhdu9Xo5Lcq4g

AD_4nXeNPsWu8SYZVkQAs1AKBVzXSCqCNnJSXFRz97DnkaHGIxGix2Zh6YmbJTQCrmPrgX3vqBOePYDLHyYhwxRNyY7s7q2Ucj32uOVbkk6jWZgH6dWxrUKjcwab1q_D0yJ_S0Fv_z7W0ckJp94i_tscuw?key=UyjQkErH6uhdu9Xo5Lcq4g

There have been really a lot of radical and fundamental changes, first on the political culture and then in our legal landscape as a result of the attack on October 7, and particularly the desire of the United States – by both parties – to arm the Israelis, to fund the Israelis, to protect the Israelis as they went about and destroyed Gaza. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals