Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Culture • Writing
Journalist Chris Hedges on Media, Terror, Gaza, and More
Video Transcript
September 24, 2024
post photo preview

Watch the full episode HERE

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google 


It's Friday, September 20. 

Tonight: As I often say on this show, one of the purposes of the twice-a-week After-Shows that we do for our Locals community is to hear suggestions from our viewers about topics we should cover and future guests we should invite. Without a doubt, the person whom our viewers have most frequently and vocally demanded that we speak to is the former New York Times reporter turned independent media powerhouse, Chris Hedges. Why haven't you put Chris Hedges on? When is Chris Hedges coming on? What can we do to help you get Chris Hedges on? And we've been helpfully hectored for months this way by our loyal viewers. 

The reality is that I am a long-time fan of Chris Hedges. I was reading his work even before I entered journalism, and we have been trying for months to find a time when he can come on. The stars finally aligned this week, and we sat down with him for a full hour just a couple of days ago, in a wide-ranging discussion about wars, past and present bipartisan foreign policy dogma, corporate media repression, state propaganda, the 2024 election, and so much more. There are really very few people in Western journalism who understand the Middle East better than him. A fluent speaker of Arabic, he covered multiple wars and conflicts in that region for years for The New York Times, including spending months, if not years in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Israel, as well as covering the wars in Kuwait and Yugoslavia in 2002 and 2003. However, he was forced out of The New York Times because he revolted against their attempts to dilute his reporting to make it align with the institutional ideology of the paper, and most of all, to try to control what he could say. While that may seem a risky move for any reporter to leave The New York Times as an established war correspondent, especially back in 2003, before the advent of exploding and far-reaching independent media, it turned out to be, unsurprisingly, the best possible move for him. Since that departure from The New York Times, both on independent news outlets and on his outstanding Substack page, Chris has broken major stories, providing some of the most informed and developed knowledge of U.S. policy in the Middle East and in general is completely free to express himself however he wants without the slightest fear of consequences. 

Independent media is not a panacea. Earlier this year, Hedges was let go by the ostensibly independent left-wing site, The Real News Network, apparently as a result of his insistence, relentlessly, vocally, and uncompromisingly criticizing Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and the Democrats in the lead-up to the election. But we would be a lot less informed and challenged without Chris Hedges's ongoing ability to thrive thanks to independent media. We are thrilled to show you our discussion with him, not only because it temporarily will put a stop to the hectoring from our audience now that we've had him on, but mostly of all because his perspectives are so worth hearing. 


Interview: Chris Hedges


G. Greenwald: Chris Hedges, it's so great to have you on the show. I have to say that our audience has been hectoring us for months, if not longer, saying why isn't Chris Hayes on the show? Why isn't Chris Hedges coming on? And I kept saying it's not for lack of effort. We just haven't been able to align our schedules. And I'm so glad that finally, we were able to do so. And I'm thrilled to have you on. 

 

Chris Hedges: Well, thanks, Glenn. I'm happy to be here. 

 

G. Greenwald: Absolutely. So, there are a lot of substantive issues about U.S. foreign policy and domestic politics that I want to talk to you about but before I get to that, I want to talk about media and how media has changed and how it's enabled people like you to find an audience without being constrained by corporate media. Because if people ask me who are the journalists who have become most influential in independent media, you're definitely one of the 3 or 4 people I would instantly say are among the top. And the irony of that is that when I first got to know you and know your work, you were not in independent media. You were in the very opposite, sort of the belly of the beast, at The New York Times, right after the immediate aftermath of 9/11. For those people who don't know the story, because I think it's such a revealing story about how corporate media works and how it worked back then, talk about the reasons why you're not any longer with The New York Times. 

 

Chris Hedges: I would say there were two major reasons. I spent seven years in the Middle East, much of that time covering Gaza. I was based in Cairo. The Jerusalem bureau for The New York Times did not really cover Gaza, they made very little effort to cover Gaza. So, I would be sent from Cairo and live in Gaza for weeks at a time. I was very frustrated with the way The New York Times covered Palestine and the way they did it, which was different. I went on to cover the war in Yugoslavia, for instance, and it wasn't like this at all. So, if I was reporting on, let's say, an airstrike on a refugee camp, in Jabalia, or somewhere else, they would pepper the article with, you know, I may have been interviewing an eyewitness, but that immediately would be followed with a different account coming from the IDF out of Jerusalem or Tel Aviv or somewhere. It had the effect of essentially neutralizing the story. By the end of the story, you could believe whatever you wanted to believe. And that was very difficult. 

Finally, in frustration, I used my vacation time to go to Gaza to write an article called “A Gaza Diary,” where I spent 10 days living in the refugee camp of Khan Yunis with a great cartoonist, Joe Sacco, who wrote “Palestine” and “Footnotes on Gaza,” and I said, I'm not going to interview any official, I'm not going to interview any PLO official, I'm not going to interview Hamas officials, I'm just going to write, day by day, what it's like in this refugee camp. That was an eruption at The Times when it was printed. And I was told although I'm an Arabic speaker, I think they only had two or three at the paper at the time, that I would never cover the Middle East again. So, that was the first blow. 

The second blow was the call to invade Iraq. I had spent a lot of time in Iraq. I had not only gone into Kuwait in the first Gulf War – I was not embedded, I was what they called a unilateral, which meant that I wasn't part of any military pool but I had grafted onto a Marine Corps unit, had gone into Kuwait with them and then stayed on in the Middle East for The New York Times, covering the destruction of the stockpiles and Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of chemical weapons, mostly in artillery shells. So, I covered all of that. I knew he might have had a tiny residue, but I knew he didn't have weapons of mass destruction. I knew it was a lie. I knew the whole premise of invading Iraq, which of course had nothing to do with 9/11, was the fiasco it became certainly up until Gaza, you know, the greatest war crime. I mean, you have to go back to Vietnam or something. And I couldn't keep quiet about that. So, I spoke very publicly on big media programs, and that angered The New York Times, especially after I was booed off the commencement stage and I was given a formal written reprimand from the paper. Though under guild rules, you get the reprimand done in writing, I was called into the office of an assistant managing editor, Bill Schmidt, and given the reprimand, presented with the reprimand and then if I violated that reprimand, if I continued to speak about the war, then I, under guild rules, could be fired. I wasn't going to stop speaking about the war and that ended my career at The New York Times. 

 

G. Greenwald: The debate that is just eternal, that people on the left and right have, is over the bias of The New York Times. What is the ideological posture of The New York Times? Conservatives internally insist there is some left-liberal bias or whatever, and then you have people on the left or even liberals who insist that it has this kind of institutional conservative bias. For me, I've always thought that the ideology of The New York Times kind of allegiance to the foreign policy community, the U.S. Security State, and it's hard to, especially these days, place it on the left or the right. But I'm wondering and I think there are a lot of people who haven't lived through that history post 9/11, the Iraq war, or people who just did but decided to forget about it. In those instances where The New York Times was diverting your stories, basically negating the things you were reporting with IDF statements, giving them equal weight, and then, especially, with this idea that you somehow couldn't speak out against the Iraq war, even though many, many New York Times journalists were free to speak out in favor of it and were doing that, would you say that the reason was that the Sulzberger family, or The New York Times, just institutionally has this ideological bias in favor of Israel, in favor of wars? Or was it more just the kind of post-9/11, uber jingoism that prevailed where, you know, I would say the majority of people in corporate media decided that their patriotic duty was to align with the War on Terror or post-9/11 policies of the U.S. government? 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
1
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Answering Your Questions About Tariffs

Many of you have been asking about the impact of Trump's tariffs, and Glenn addressed how we are covering the issue during our mail bag segment yesterday. As always, we are grateful for your thought-provoking questions! Thank you, and keep the questions coming!

00:11:10
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Breaks Down Trump's DOJ Speech on Fox News
00:04:52
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Discusses Mahmoud Khalil on Fox News
00:08:35
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
LAST-MINUTE CHANGE: Ask Questions for Today's Mailbag on System Update!

Norm Finkelstein will be joining us tomorrow for the whole show, so please post all of your questions here. There’s a lot to discuss: Tulsi Gabbard’s Russiagate report, Columbia’s settlement with the Trump Administration, the new censorship bill working through Congress, and more!

We watched the tragedy unfold
We did as we were told
We bought and sold
It was the greatest show on earth
But then it was over
We ohhed and aahed
We drove our racing cars
We ate our last few jars of caviar
And somewhere out there in the stars
A keen-eyed look-out
Spied a flickering light
Our last hurrah
And when they found our shadows
Grouped 'round the TV sets
They ran down every lead
They repeated every test
They checked out all the data on their lists
And then the alien anthropologists
Admitted they were still perplexed
But on eliminating every other reason
For our sad demise
They logged the only explanation left
This species has amused itself to death
No tears to cry
No feelings left
This species has
Amused itself to death

Here is a great podcast with Friend of Show, Aaron Mate, being interviewed by Professor Glenn Diesen on the fraud that was Russia-gate:

post photo preview
Semafor Editor Ben Smith on Epstein Saga; How do MAGA Supporters Really Feel About Trump's Foreign Policy? Eddington Movie Review: Reflections on 2020
System Update #490

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXfT_BDy4ZmCv7YowmlpimI3uiq7dVGVrebs2HL5mg4ECkvfhs3Y9eBAUpJII2f7KX_c0cHmCe_nJBq8K854h7KfY2o0T-_oXaV3vkUdy7KoA6IgnNWbT7_2jA5tfHRgXGATMZsLGqoQcnMQKCpn6Fk?key=4MGSGk-P8UsiVP_KGEUadw

Michael Tracey: Good evening, everybody. I'm Michael Tracey, and Glenn is somewhere. So, this is where I triumphantly storm in and anger parts of the audience who would prefer not to have to see my face, which I have to say, on some level, I sympathize with. 

Tonight, an interesting show. We'll be joined by Ben Smith, who is the editor-in-chief of Semafor and a longtime political observer, journalist, editor. And we will probably, I think, provide you with a slightly counterintuitive for different perspective anyway, on the meaning of the whole Epstein saga that continues to engulf American politics and media, seemingly. 

We'll also bring in somebody who works on this very show, and who you often don't see on camera, she stays behind the cameras but today, we're going to pry her out because Meagan O'Rourke, who I often do interviews with, and she's a producer on the show, I'm sure should be a fan favorite anyway. We're going to do actually a review of a new movie. This is a little out of left field based on typical System Update content, but there's a new movie that I happened to see last night, partly at the adamant urging of Meagan, called Eddington. And I think it's an incredible movie and an incredible window into a lot that's going on politically and culturally. So we're going to a movie review tonight. 

And we are also going to show some footage that she and I collected, actually back on the Fourth of July, earlier this month, that has been available on Locals for you subscribers for several weeks. But what we wanted to do was go to like an area that is sort of ground zero for salt of the earth, Joe six-pack style supporters of Trump voters and ask them about his foreign policy record thus far, particularly the bombing of Iran, which may seem like eons ago at this point, but it was only last month, and the full ramifications have not really been settled. 

AD_4nXfT_BDy4ZmCv7YowmlpimI3uiq7dVGVrebs2HL5mg4ECkvfhs3Y9eBAUpJII2f7KX_c0cHmCe_nJBq8K854h7KfY2o0T-_oXaV3vkUdy7KoA6IgnNWbT7_2jA5tfHRgXGATMZsLGqoQcnMQKCpn6Fk?key=4MGSGk-P8UsiVP_KGEUadw

Michael Tracey and Meagan O'Rourke

Okay, so we're going to go a little bit off the beaten path tonight because I know my mind has been largely occupied by this movie that I saw last night. And if it was just a well-crafted drama, or if there were just some sterling acting performances that were put in, I'm not sure that I would necessarily have been compelled to discuss it on System Update. 

However, there's like an interesting synergy going on in the universe where we have this Epstein story that keeps embroiling the American political and media worlds with some new developments on that score even just this afternoon and we have the opening of this movie which really gets to the beating heart in a very unparalleled way for like a cinematic experience of what drives the contemporary kind of like internet addled American political psyche. 

It's called “Eddington.” I guess we'll try to steer away from spoilers. We'll play the trailer for those who are not familiar. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
World Finally Horrified by Israel's Atrocities in Gaza; Mass Starvation Expert Warns of Spiraling Crisis in Gaza; AOC Votes to Fund Israel's Iron Dome
System Update #489

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXdDv1jKaVLrSHfHcxjzD8ZzSIHBr394LRn3K_HF558Wxr3ZNlHseYFEoO9tbN-y8evkWTnLDuUYw9I6UnlxrxyiloWFQ3dVP5qm_C8T86dntn8nv90jM_SHo8pukYsy9QtsAGe-cuetCuLtGqZR4QQ?key=woXOmZZkg72ma4D0gIyUwA

The atrocities and crimes against humanity committed by Israel in Gaza have become continuously more horrifying and more inhumane over the last 21 months. Even when one thinks that Israel could do nothing worse, they always seem to manage to do exactly that. That there is mass starvation and even mass famine in Gaza is beyond any reasonable dispute. The scenes from Gaza are really the stuff of horror films, of the greatest historical evils, of classic genocide and it's all paid for and armed by the U.S. and the West generally – in case you're wondering why you should care about this more than something else. 

We'll review all of the latest atrocities and then speak with Alex de Waal, the British executive director of the World Peace Foundation at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He has a lot to say about where the Israeli-imposed famine in Gaza ranks among all the other famines he's had to witness. 

We’ll also note that not everyone is being passive or silent about these horrors in Gaza. Late last week, the Republican Congresswoman from Georgia, Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced a bill to cut off all American funding for Israel's Iron Dome, simply arguing that what she called a nuclear-armed Israel – something that everyone knows is true, but you're not allowed to say, and yet she said it on the House floor –  is more than capable of paying for its own defense. Why should American workers be forced to subsidize Israelis' defense? 

Her bill was supported by her fellow genuine America First Republican, Thomas Massie, of Kentucky, as well as four Democrats: Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Al Green and Summer Lee. But one very conspicuous YES vote on having American workers continue to fund a key part of Israel's military arsenal was a New York congresswoman named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Even her most stalwart fans, who are extremely reluctant to criticize her, erupted with anger over not just her vote but also the explanation she provided, which made the situation much worse. This really says a lot about the emerging political dynamic around Israel and the United States and that's the part that I think merits the greatest attention. 

AD_4nXdDv1jKaVLrSHfHcxjzD8ZzSIHBr394LRn3K_HF558Wxr3ZNlHseYFEoO9tbN-y8evkWTnLDuUYw9I6UnlxrxyiloWFQ3dVP5qm_C8T86dntn8nv90jM_SHo8pukYsy9QtsAGe-cuetCuLtGqZR4QQ?key=woXOmZZkg72ma4D0gIyUwA

AD_4nXdaMDjGWiLjKGhPNMUOteGnNl98IUfphxvSSHB46C3z2UwIbix6NnAw_LcsxUH4-CUJrlGV0GpLA4g0b93nff9I_065DhxqganxbH3ALknFhaFmLK6BZNA5HzBVFJq5qPwyFAFYGDeccWhhDyLquQ?key=woXOmZZkg72ma4D0gIyUwA

One of the struggles of covering what the Israelis are doing to Gaza and have been doing for the last 21 months is that so many times you get to this point of despair where you feel like no words are sufficient any longer to explain, describe and express the level of utter sadism and sociopathic cruelty and war criminality that you're watching unfold every day, and not just unfold, but get worse and worse the more it goes. It's been a gradual, inexorable, but horrific destruction of all civilian life in Gaza; constant, indiscriminate slaughter of innocent Palestinians, including untold numbers, but certainly tens of thousands of children who have been shot in the head by snipers, blown up into little bits and pieces. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Congress Again Dictates Curriculum & Faculty at Private Universities; How UnitedHealth Group Silences its Critics: With NYT Reporter David Enrich
System Update #488

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXfbauxDuxae1Q7OSYafF8EtxqWgcnGfBQakVpf7_2lkyqUsxMIV9F9xarGlHSbAGRnHp1NLta2f2L6jisp3yNA42VZUXwrITHDKY9ypmDvR2iOApmWiNWnZr3yyN_LPG7AMjdNhBG7foLmBg1SneQg?key=QEh1F3pE6JzpBjyxrbPdRw

The desire to micromanage universities does not extend to all issues but seemingly just to one, namely, what can and cannot be said about Israel and about Jewish individuals in particular. As they have done countless times over the past 18 months, the House yesterday held a hearing on antisemitism in America's universities, hauling three more college presidents before them to interrogate them on why they allow certain people to teach or certain opinions about Israel or American foreign policy to be expressed. This is all accompanied by a growing trend, a rapidly growing trend of forcing these universities to implement radically expanded "hate speech" codes with the purpose of outlawing what can and cannot be said about Israel. We'll report on the latest House hearing and how it is directly assaulting the free speech and academic freedom rights of Americans. 

 Our guest was reporter David Enrich, who published an extremely well-reported and important article last week detailing the means that UnitedHealth Care is using to silence critics.

AD_4nXfbauxDuxae1Q7OSYafF8EtxqWgcnGfBQakVpf7_2lkyqUsxMIV9F9xarGlHSbAGRnHp1NLta2f2L6jisp3yNA42VZUXwrITHDKY9ypmDvR2iOApmWiNWnZr3yyN_LPG7AMjdNhBG7foLmBg1SneQg?key=QEh1F3pE6JzpBjyxrbPdRw

AD_4nXf1_wUNmtoxrkk5rq0NXdJFV2hnlTpLy24-W3G-jNOBya9JCCjtCrFLD0e0Aspirw9d65J-Wb06eZBG4SFf8V4ea93Z2rdHz0Xd3BsQVPfwMzzu9ElFS842GQmhM__M_jTBuAo1NQai96ZP67u_Ig?key=QEh1F3pE6JzpBjyxrbPdRw

Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene are two members of the House, both Republicans, who have often noted how often the House meets in order to discuss matters pertaining not to the lives of the American people, but to Israel or to combating criticism of Israel or to investigating the alleged epidemic of bigotry not against every minority group, but against only American Jews, notoriously, excluded from centers of power in the United States. It's like an obsession. They do it all the time. Every time I turn around, there's another hearing about antisemitism or about criticism of Israel being organized by the Republican-led House and Senate.

 Yesterday was no exception. The Committee on Education and Workforce, which is chaired by House member Virginia Foxx, a Republican of South Carolina who oftentimes has no idea where she is, it was entitled – and it sounds like a kind of woke thesis from one of these universities that they're so interested in:

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals