Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
Ohio Train Disaster: How Corruption and Greed Created Catastrophe, w/ David Sirota
Plus: Hawley's New Social Media Law
February 15, 2023
post photo preview

Note From Glenn Greenwald: The following is the full show transcript, for subscribers only, of a recent episode of our System Update program, broadcast live on Rumble on Tuesday, February 14, 2023. Watch System Update Episode #41 here on Rumble. 


In this episode, we take a look at Senator Josh Hawley, the Missouri Republican, who has long supported the conservative view on culture war issues, that parental rights are sacrosanct and that it should be parents, not the state or school bureaucrats, who decide what American children learn about social, cultural and religious debates and how they learn about them. Yet this week, Senator Hawley has introduced a new law that would deprive America's parents of the right to decide for their own children when and how those children can start using social media and replace that parental decision-making power with a blanket rule from the state that bans social media from allowing any children under the age of 16 to use social media, even if their own parents believe they are ready to use it. We'll examine the values in conflict as a result of Senator Hawley's bill and whether it can be reconciled with the banner of parental rights, which the American right has been waving as part of the culture wars. 

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update starting right now. 


Monologue:

Many of the most inflammatory culture war issues over the last several years have involved fights over what children should and should not be taught in public schools about highly contested questions regarding history, race and gender ideology. But a related dispute is whether communities and parents are acting recklessly – or even endangering children – by allowing them to attend so-called drag shows or read books about LGBT history and how to understand their own gender. 

When these controversies began receiving significant public attention a few years ago, conservatives – often led by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis – waved the banner of parental rights. They objected to children being taught – or indoctrinated with – highly disputed beliefs about social issues. Aside from arguing that schools should focus on teaching students the traditional subjects they need to advance in their education and prepare themselves for the adult world – English, mathematics, science, geography, chemistry, algebra and the rest – opposition to much of the curriculum centered on the view that the responsibility to decide what children learn about political and social issues – and how they learn it – should rest with parents and not with school bureaucrats or elected officials using the force of law. 

In March of last year, Governor DeSantis published an announcement on his official website under this title: “Governor Ron DeSantis Signs Historic Bill to Protect Parental Rights in Education.” The announcement emphasized that value over and over – parental rights - in announcing, in the governor's words, that he had signed

House Bill (HB) 1557, Parental Rights Education, which reinforces parent's fundamental right to make decisions regarding the upbringing of their children”. 

The bill prohibits classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in kindergarten through 3rd grade and prohibits instruction that is not age appropriate for students and requires school districts to adopt procedures for notifying parents if there is a change in services from the school regarding a child's mental, emotional or physical health or well-being. 

The Bill builds on the Parents’ Bill of Rights, which was signed into law in Florida last year, and as part of Governor DeSantis’ Year of the Parent focus on protecting parental rights in education. 

Parents’ rights have been increasingly under assault around the nation but, in Florida, we stand up for the rights of parents and the fundamental role they play in the education of their children”, said Governor Ron DeSantis. “Parents have every right to be informed about services offered to their children at school (Florida Governor’s Office. March 2022).

As that passage demonstrates, the banner of parental rights has been the one most frequently waved by conservatives in these culture war debates. It is the parent's right to decide what social, cultural, and religious influences their kids are exposed to – or not exposed to – and not the role of the state and its educational bureaucracy to decide that for the parents. 

Yet, now, Josh Hawley, the Republican senator from Missouri, who has been an outspoken advocate of the right's views in many of these culture war issues, often waving the banner of parental responsibility and parental rights himself, has introduced a bill this week that seems to me to do the opposite. That bill would deny parents the right to decide when and how their children can use social media and instead transfer the responsibility to make that decision away from the parents and onto the state. 

As Fox Business reports today about this bill, 

Missouri GOP Senator Josh Hawley has introduced a pair of bills aimed at protecting kids online – one that would implement an age requirement for social media usage and another that would study the harmful impact of social media on children. The first bill titled the Making Age-Verification Technology Uniform, Robust and Effective Act (MATURE Act) […]

He went out of his way to create this acronym: MATURE Act

[…] would place a minimum age requirement of 16 years old for all social media users, preventing platforms from offering accounts to those who do not meet the age threshold (Fox Business. Feb. 14, 2023). 

Hawley’s other measure, titled The Federal Social Media Research Act, would commission a government report on the harm of social media for kids. That study, according to the senator's office, would examine and “track social media's effects on children over 10 years old.”

I don't think anybody objects to a study to understand how this technology that is still quite new in our lives and continuously evolving – social media – is impacting the nation's children. I don't think many people would object to that; I know I wouldn't. The question of the other bill, however, I find much more difficult to grapple with, which is the idea that there should be a minimum age that applies nationally, to every community, to every state, and to every family, that prohibits any children under the age of 16 from using social media – even if you, as the parent of your children, conclude that your children are ready and able to use social media at the age of 13 or 14 or 15 with whatever guidelines and limits you decide are necessary for them to do that. 

Under this bill, Josh Hawley is taking away the power for you to decide for your own children at what age they are able to use social media and replacing your decision-making power with that uniform minimum law from the federal government that says that it shall be illegal in essence, for social media companies to remit children under the age of 16, to use Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and the rest. 

Before delving into what I think are some interesting and difficult questions raised by this law, let's listen to Sen. Hawley himself at a hearing today in the Senate in which he defends his own bill and has an exchange with the witness he believes illustrates the need for it. 

(Video 12:44)

Sen. J. Hawley:  It wasn't until Carson was a freshman in high school – was about 14, I would guess – that we finally allowed him to have social media because – this is what caught my attention – that was how all the students were making new connections. Could you just say something about that? Because that's the experience, I think, of every parent. My kids are, my boys are ten and eight, and they're not on social media yet. But I know they'll want to be soon because they'll say, “Well, everybody else is on it.” So, could you just say a word about that?

 

Witness:  Yes. Thank you. We waited as long as we possibly could, and we were receiving a lot of pressure from our son to be involved. I think – and I hear this a lot from other parents – you don't want to isolate your kid either. And so, we felt by waiting as long as possible, talking about the harms – don't ever say anything that you don't want on a billboard with your name and face next to it, that we were doing all the right things and that he was old enough. He was by far the last kid in his class to get access to this technology. Yet this still happened to us.

 

Sen. J. Hawley: Yeah, that's just incredible. Well, you were good parents and you were a good mother. Incredibly good mother, clearly. This is why I support and have introduced legislation to set 16 years old as the age threshold for which kids can get on social media and require the social media companies to verify it. I heard your answers.[…]  I just have to say this, as a father myself, when you say things like, well, the parents really ought to be educated. Listen, the kids’ ability and I bet you had this experience, the kid's ability to figure out how to set what's on this phone. And my ten-year-old knows more about this phone than I know about it. Already. What's going to be like in another four years or five or six years, like your son?

 

So, I just say, as a parent, it would put me much more in the driver's seat if the law was “You couldn't have a phone. I'm sorry you couldn't get on social media till six”. I mean, that would help me as a parent. So that's why I'm proposing it. Parents are in favor of it. I got the idea from parents who came to me and said, Please help us. You know, please help us. And listen, I'm all for tech training. It's great. But I just don't think that's going to cut it. So, I've introduced legislation to do it. Let's keep it simple. Let's just, let's put this power in the hands of parents. I'd start there. 

I'm really confused by that last part where he said, “let's put the power in the hands of parents,” because what he's doing is clearly the opposite. He's taking away the power of parents to decide when their own children can go on social media or not. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
28
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: Another Week Another News Cycle

What’s happening in politics that you want to talk about? Are there any burning topics you think Glenn needs to cover? Any thoughts you’d like to share?

This post will be pinned to our profile for the remainder of this week, so comment below anytime with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Glenn will respond to a few comments here—and may even address some on our next supporters-only After Show.

Thank you so much for your continued support through another week of SYSTEM UPDATE with Glenn Greenwald!

🏆Dog-of-the-Week:

Dog-of-the-Week goes to… Zeus! Our adorable puppy friend has returned (and grown)! Also happy to see him is Zuma as they share some brotherly love while Glenn gets to some aftershow questions.

Member of the Month [March]

We are excited to introduce a new segment on Locals: Member of the Month!

This post allows the SYSTEM UPDATE team to properly recognize our valued and conversation-provoking supporters. We thought this to be long overdue—as week by week, so many of you provide vital input, engaging conversations, and gripping questions.

Member of the Month: @BookWench

Thank you so much for your contribution to this community. Your questions, conversations, and ideas are so appreciated.

post photo preview
Fallout From Terrorist Attack on Moscow

On Friday, March 22 at the Moscow Concert Hall, one of the deadliest attacks on Russia in decades took place: several gunmen killed 137 and wounded more than 100 people.

U.S. officials claim the group is ISIS-K, while Russia suspects it was Western-backed Ukrainians.

What are your thoughts?

post photo preview
post photo preview
THE WEEKLY UPDATE: MARCH 25-29
Weekly Newsletter

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week. These are written versions of the reporting and analysis we did on last week's episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE.

—Glenn Greenwald

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
SYSTEM UPDATE RECAP: MAR 25-29
Weekly Recap

Welcome to the SYSTEM UPDATE recap, your weekend digest featuring everything we’ve covered throughout the previous week. 

Prefer to listen to your daily news analysis? Reminder that FULL episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE are available anywhere you listen to podcasts🎙️

Enjoy!


MONDAY, MARCH 25 - EPISODE 247

A Trifecta of Media Corruption: Ronna McDaniel/NBC, Kara Swisher/Big Tech, & Andrew Huberman/New York Mag

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (9:32)

Hypocritical Meltdown (16:20)

Silicon Valley’s Favorite (45:26)

Bizarre Hit Piece (1:03:23)

Outro (1:16:32)

 

TUESDAY, MARCH 26 - EPISODE 248

Assange Wins Very Partial Victory in UK Court, w/ Stella Assange. New Film Shows Mass Israeli Extremism, w/ Journalist Jeremy Loffredo

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (6:59)

Assange Wins Partial Victory (13:43)

Interview with Stella Assange (33:43)

Documenting Israeli War Crimes (43:51)

Interview with Jeremy Loffredo (57:45)

Outro (1:15:20)

 

*Go to friends.rumble.cloud for 30% off the first 3 months of your Cloud Compute subscription.

 

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27 - EPISODE 249

Lee Fang Exposes 60 Minutes’ Disinfo “Expert” as Partisan Hack. PLUS: The Atlantic Targets Pro-Palestine Stanford Students with Nepo Baby Theo Baker

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (7:22)

Fake Experts, Fake Expertise (14:54)

Interview with Lee Fang (45:20)

The Atlantic Doxxes Pro-Palestine Student (1:08:56)

Outro (1:29:25)

 

*Go to https://www.1775coffee.com/GLENN and use code GLENN for 10% off at checkout on your first order.

 

THURSDAY, March 28 - EPISODE 250

Texas Gov. Abbot Mandates “Safe Space” Exception for Jewish Students. Ben Shapiro’s Mental Gymnastics to Justify Candace Owens’ Firing

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (9:50)

Safe Spaces Mandatory in Texas (15:45)

Justifying the Unjustifiable (58:22)

Outro (1:25:59)

 

Go right now to hillsdale.edu/GLENN to enroll for FREE access to more than 40 online courses. There’s no cost, and it’s easy to get started. 

 

Supporters-Only After Show for Thursday, March 28

We moved to Locals for our supporters-only, interactive after show, where Glenn shared his thoughts on some burning audience questions:

 

@Jim_M58

1. We lost our Ruby at around the same time your doggie crossed the Rainbow Bridge in Sept. I totally feel your loss. 2. My bride tells me that there's been a L O T of subscribers asking/cajoling/ etc'ing you to have Douglas Murray on. Since I don't come here often anymore, can you PUH-LEEZE explain why?

 

@stephenpw

You bring up the prof at Univ. of Illinois. Guaranteed, the decisions made at that university, as at the vast majority of U.S. universities, are being made by liberal democrats not conservatives or even moderates. The majority of jewish citizens in the United States identify as democrats or liberals. The hypocrisy of "free speech" conservatives is disturbing to say the least but, the majority of these calls for censorship of anti Israel sentiment is coming from those who identify with the left not the right.

 

Available for paid supporters here


Want to join us every Tuesday and Thursday for this supporter-exclusive, live after show? Become a paid supporter here!

Read full Article
post photo preview
Texas Gov. Abbot Mandates “Safe Space” Exception for Jewish Students. Ben Shapiro’s Mental Gymnastics to Justify Candace Owens’ Firing
Video Transcript

Watch the full episode here: 

placeholder
 

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Thursday, March 28. 

Tonight: Few ideas have been mocked more viciously over the last decade than the notion of "safe spaces." Whenever various minority groups—marginalized groups as we now call them—have justified the need for censorship and other speech codes on college campuses, that phrase was invariably invoked: unless vulnerable college students—who are adults—are protected from ideas that upset them or make them feel threatened, then they won't feel safe. Not just conservative pundits but also self-styled free speech champions have created a virtual cottage industry—a very lucrative one at that—of mocking the idea that college students—in particular, certain called minority groups—need safe spaces.

Yesterday, Texas's Republican Governor Greg Abbott issued an Executive Order that applies to all universities in his state. What did he say was the purpose of this executive order? To create "safe spaces"- not for all students on Texas campuses, but only for one minority group in particular: Texas Jewish students. This is merely the latest in a long line of legal measures and other forms of special privileges created largely by red states and Republican Governors in the name of fighting racism, bigotry and other forms of prejudice by protecting members of a minority group from certain views. If it sounds like the exact left-liberal culture war mindset that conservatives generally mock rather than embrace, you would be exactly correct, with the only difference being which groups are protected by each side using this mentality. 

All of this points to the lurking contradictions that have long plagued conservative politics because of their claimed principles and the willingness of many of them to abandon them in the name of protecting Israel – that have finally emerged in plain daylight since October 7. We will examine this Executive Order issued by Governor Abbott yesterday as well as the reaction to it.

Then: Speaking of the irreconcilable inconsistencies in right-wing politics when it comes to Israel, Ben Shapiro yesterday sat down to speak with Dave Rubin. These two have a lot in common. They have both become extremely wealthy men by championing the cause of free speech and free discourse and opposing cancel culture. They are both among the nation's most fanatical supporters of a foreign country, Israel, and they each embody exactly the burning, consuming contradictions I just described when it comes to their claimed principles on the one hand and their willingness to do anything to protect the country of Israel on the other.

One of the topics both of them discussed is why the Daily Wire – the right-wing free speech outlet founded by Shapiro in 2015 – parted ways with its very popular host Candace Owens over her views about Israel. Within this discussion resides a great deal of insight about how many conservatives have been struggling with issues of free speech and other basic civil rights since October 7 and well before that. The discussion is worth examining for that reason.

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting now.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals