Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Culture • Writing
IDF General Admits War Impossible Without US Support. Unprecedented Trump Aide Sentence Exposes Dangerous Establishment Lawfare. Josh Hawley’s Revealing Takedown of Biden Judicial Nominee, w/ Matt Stoller
Video Transcript
March 21, 2024
post photo preview

Watch the full episode here: 

placeholder
 

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Wednesday, March 20. 

Tonight: Israel's war in Gaza, now in its sixth month, is still raging without any end in sight. In the last week, several leading international aid organizations, as well as the World Bank, documented that what they call a catastrophic famine among the 2.2 million people of Gaza is no longer merely probable, but rather inevitable and imminent. There are well-documented cases now of young Palestinian children, including babies, dying of hunger, the single worst and most painful way for a human being to die. At the start of the war, back in October, Israel's defense minister, Yoav Gallant, vowed that Israel would block all food and water from entering Gaza, and they have obviously made very good on that war promise. 

People obviously have very different views on this war. That is an obvious statement. It is very polarizing. But there is one point that is simply beyond dispute. This is not Israel's war only, but also America's. In particular, it is Joe Biden's war. Immediately after October 7, Joe Biden flew to Israel to do what he has done so many times in his decades in Washington, namely, he promised Tel Aviv unlimited financing and arms from the American Treasury for their new war without any conditions. Last November, an Israeli general admitted what many Israel supporters in the U.S. often try to deny, namely that the only reason that Israel is capable of fighting this war for six months and destroying Gaza is because of the financial and military support it provided by President Biden and conversely, if Joe Biden cut off American aid to Israel, Israel's ability to continue to bomb, occupy and destroy Gaza would come to an end. That admission has significant implications for American citizens, American policy and American values. And we will examine those tonight.  

Then: one of Donald Trump's closest aides, Peter Navarro, went to prison today for four months. His crime: he refused to comply with a congressional subpoena that directed him to appear for a hearing of the January 6 committee. Navarro's argument for refusing to attend that hearing was that the information they sought was protected by executive privilege, and regardless of what might think of that defense, what matters here is that many top Washington officials over the years have been formally charged with contempt of a subpoena by Congress, but Navarro is the very first in American history to ever go to jail for this crime. Over and over, American law is being weaponized, and the criminal justice system is politicized by the very people who claim that they are the only guardians of American democracy and norms. We will take a look at this case to see yet again what pro-establishment anti-Trump lawfare really looks like when it's in its most vivid form. 

And then finally: last month, President Biden nominated a longtime corporate lawyer named Sparkle Sooknanan for a lifelong position on the federal court as a district court judge. Today, Sparkle Sooknanan appeared for a confirmation hearing in the Senate, and one of her most critical interrogators was Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. Hawley focused on the work she did for the large corporate law firm Jones Day, where she defended multiple hedge funds who are trying to extract as much wealth as possible from Puerto Rico right after the island suffered a massive debt crisis and Jones Day and this Biden nominee attempted to leave ordinary people who are bondholders in Puerto Rico on the hook for that debt, while hedge funds created all sorts of innovative arguments to ensure that they were paid in full. 

Senator Hawley's line of questioning reveals a great deal about the reality of both political parties when it comes to values and policies like corporatism and neoliberalism, and it also reveals a lot about the types of people the White House chooses to shape American law for decades to come through lifelong appointees to the federal bench. We'll examine this genuinely interesting exchange that happened in the Senate and highlight what it reveals. To help us explore that, we will speak to the good friend of our show, Matt Stoller of the American Economics Liberties Project, who is one of the country's leading antitrust experts and also a vocal critic of what is often called Big Law, namely, the massive, sprawling corporate law firms that often lobby defend the nation's centers of financial and political power. Matt has worked in almost every nook and cranny in Washington for years. He understands it and critiques it as anyone and always has a lot of interesting things to say, and I'm sure that tonight will be no exception. 

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
25
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Answering Your Questions About Tariffs

Many of you have been asking about the impact of Trump's tariffs, and Glenn addressed how we are covering the issue during our mail bag segment yesterday. As always, we are grateful for your thought-provoking questions! Thank you, and keep the questions coming!

00:11:10
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Breaks Down Trump's DOJ Speech on Fox News
00:04:52
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Discusses Mahmoud Khalil on Fox News
00:08:35
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

Sasha Stone supports Matt Taibbi against fellow journalists who questioned his integrity on Substack:
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashastone/p/what-leighton-woodhouse-gets-wrong?r=1ngpds&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

It’s true that  the Republican states who ban lab-grown meat are doing it to protect the cattle industry and, by extension cultural heritage. I don't doubt that there are powerful factory farm interests that are behind this, and I agree that republicans are hypocritical, but I’m still against lab-grown meat for these reasons: 

1. Food sovereignty: Small farmers cannot afford the bioreactors and other equipment to produce lab-grown meat for their communities.Our food system is highly centralized and lab grown meat will likely exacerbate this problem. I don't believe corporations will ever produce healthy food in a responsible way. I farmed for ten years on organic family farms because I came to the conclusion that the only answer to our health and environmental problems is producing food in the same community where it's consumed. I want our government to encourage and protect family farming. 

2. Growing meat in a lab introduces myriad new environmental, health, and ethical problems...

13 hours ago

Trump's immigration policies have created a flood of court injunctions, stays, and emergency applications that seems to have forced the Supreme Court to make decisions unsigned, and without stating reasons for the decision. I believe this process is often referred to the "Shadow Docket". Since this process is becoming more and more prevalent, how can such lack of transparency, and decisions not merit based, be considered in keeping with our democratic principles? Do believe this process is adequate, particularly since habeas corpus is often at stake?

post photo preview
Curt Mills on the Trump Administration's Foreign Policy, Israel, and Iran; Plus: Glenn Takes Your Questions
System Update #456

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXeW2_-dZXohMzFnZoORP5QNBYBRjSgE-wu1LZlO0JzfffV7tK5vJUnK38-wnlgUj_-nyJaPSYD2zBTm5Y6i_xQXMrF07x4cPd-2he9gkz1SBBeV5Mpel7JgorFqwT1lAzjfJHnIVzzJP2VOgKR3Kw?key=UWCrhfTLJd7Atdngtimfwg

President Trump's 3-country trip to the Persian Gulf States this week, as well as a foreign policy address he delivered while in Saudi Arabia, has many people believing that the President laid out a radically new foreign policy vision that sharply departs from the bipartisan dogma of the last 60 years. And it's not just his words, but his actions that have many people believing this: from Ukraine and Iran to Syria and Israel. How real is this new foreign policy vision, how new and how concrete is it? 

We really can't think of many people better to explore this with than Curt Mills. He's the Executive Director of the journal The American Conservative – long identified with the paleoconservative tradition and the non-interventionist wing of the American right. He has been one of the most vocal voices from that wing on Trump's foreign policy and the urgent need to move the U.S. away from its bipartisan foreign policy of fighting endless wars all over the world that have no benefit to the American people or its country, but much harm to the country and the world. 

Every Friday night, we have a Q&A session where we take questions from our Locals members and do our best to answer as many as we can. As is usually the case, the quality of the questions is quite high and the range is far-reaching, so we look forward to doing our best to discuss the questions raised by our members. 

AD_4nXeW2_-dZXohMzFnZoORP5QNBYBRjSgE-wu1LZlO0JzfffV7tK5vJUnK38-wnlgUj_-nyJaPSYD2zBTm5Y6i_xQXMrF07x4cPd-2he9gkz1SBBeV5Mpel7JgorFqwT1lAzjfJHnIVzzJP2VOgKR3Kw?key=UWCrhfTLJd7Atdngtimfwg

Curt Mills is the Executive Director of The American Conservative and has long been one of the most informative voices on foreign policy, especially the paleoconservative version of it, the non-interventionist version of that. Just as a side note, the American Conservative happens to be the first magazine ever to pay me to publish an article. That was back in 2005, maybe 2006, right when I was just starting. They asked me to write about the dangers of the Bush-Cheney assault in the name of the War on Terror. I ended up writing several other articles for them over the next few years against the War on Terror and the wars that it entailed. So, there's been a lot of alignment between me and that magazine, not fully, but a lot of alignment because they come from this part of the Republican Party, that I do happen to have a lot in common with, and we're very excited to have Curt with us. He's a really interesting thinker who ponders these questions quite a bit. And so, we have a lot to talk to him about tonight. 

G. Greenwald: Curt, good evening. Welcome to the show. It's great to see you. 

Curt Mills: Good evening. Thanks. It's an honor. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Rebrand of Syria's al-Jolani: Does the Term "Terrorist" Mean Anything?  "Free Market" Governors Ban Lab-Grown Meats to Protect Meat Industry: With Reason Journalist Emma Camp
System Update #455

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXd8syZ2DK8AxzfmOPC5htHbGAnUgWfT1QOt5sHCew3xAjURFGOeAdqzct4FQ9NAKgzztObsqddAWwLOQ5KH_IzhGOULBsBaLPNyEfHvsRzSf6qOhvHufkbul5BxgzpQSfb8YCyvWLlXklinx1XJy94?key=Hkf78G8ea-r-bmzXNaylUw

 The "interim" President of Syria was known until about five months ago by his terrorist’s name, Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, but now he has undergone a major western transformation by which he traded his military, tunic and pants combo for Armani suits and ties. He has even been given a new, less threatening name: Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa, President of Syria. As recently as December, the Justice Department on its site branded him a wanted al-Qaeda terrorist and offered a $5 million reward for any information leading to his capture. I know where he is, he's right there, he's ruling over Syria and Damascus. 

What a difference a few months make. This monstrous al-Qaeda terrorist is now a respected world leader because the U.S., Israel and the EU countries decided, for whatever reasons, that they want him to rule Syria. 

President Trump met with Jolani, or the Syrian President, on Tuesday in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where he shook his hand, posed for pictures, and then gushed about how handsome and tough he is. All that was preceded by a state visit to France, where President Macron welcomed him by standing in front of the storied presidential palace in Paris, as al-Jolani pulled up in his black chauffeured car. 

Remember, we fought a 20-year war against al-Qaeda. 

How can someone almost literally overnight go from a wanted al-Qaeda terrorist monster to someone the West unifies to embrace as a world leader? All of this leads to many important questions, starting with: does this very term "terrorist" have any real or fixed meaning at all? Or is it just a propaganda term that gets applied arbitrarily? 

In our second segment, Emma Camp, associate editor of Reason Magazine, joins us to discuss the ban announced by Greg Monforte, the governor of Montana, on lab-grown meat. She has written extensively about this topic. It's just a very strange thing to watch the state ban people from wanting to consume food that has been approved and that they want to eat. You don't have to like lab-grown meat; the solution is just don't buy it and don't consume it, but don't try to ban other people who want to. 

AD_4nXd8syZ2DK8AxzfmOPC5htHbGAnUgWfT1QOt5sHCew3xAjURFGOeAdqzct4FQ9NAKgzztObsqddAWwLOQ5KH_IzhGOULBsBaLPNyEfHvsRzSf6qOhvHufkbul5BxgzpQSfb8YCyvWLlXklinx1XJy94?key=Hkf78G8ea-r-bmzXNaylUw

AD_4nXfgpwPBK3421DJyILygq7VeFLuWrMeZia_aOL1NSRjpQLN6_NMuSHNkU5zYpbHz7WjQU2dnocJLExsrlCqclgjnbKyULEZ3ktuLX_c3lmvw-mA-Gy2T2HvHf5G9zJPnBCABjmJoJSsu-LX4JcjU5Oc?key=Hkf78G8ea-r-bmzXNaylUw

 

So, there is this very strange phenomenon that I've actually been talking about and writing about for a long time, which is how malleable and empty this term terrorism seems to be in terms of the way it's applied. It's an extremely central term. In fact, we fought a war for 20 years after 9/11 in multiple different countries in the name of stopping terrorism. 

We constantly kill people or imprison them based on accusations that they're terrorists. Yet, there's that old saying that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. So often, we take people whom we don't like, and we call them terrorists. Then, when we decide that they're actually of use to us and we say, “Oh, that term doesn't apply anymore.” That leads to the question of the origin of this term. Where did it come from? Doesn’t it actually mean anything? 

In The New York Times, on May 14, which was yesterday, there was an article with an interesting headline. It says: “Trump Meets Former Militant Who Now Leads Syria” 

That word, militant, is a very nice word. It's very benign. One can be militant about anything. I can be a militant wanting to cure cancer, I can be a militant wanting to feed children. Doesn't really scare anyone. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Jake Tapper Pretends He Didn't Know About Biden's Decline; Trump's Saudi Arabia Speech: A New Foreign Policy?
System Update #454

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXdQrpX0DhTOjXaHgxx_8pmT4g0HqKkkYgv2y7g6F5KMVnNmqmnqXOoivqK49ANRiE-R5ototNxvN6bPwwASRg46RsDJywhnWiJfgBBMVCcw8mlbciVa7W4fLD6lrghYW6KNetklbQ5hqOfb0iJNiA?key=PznXErAzPOrBW-J7hCIN9g

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals