Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
IDF General Admits War Impossible Without US Support. Unprecedented Trump Aide Sentence Exposes Dangerous Establishment Lawfare. Josh Hawley’s Revealing Takedown of Biden Judicial Nominee, w/ Matt Stoller
Video Transcript
March 21, 2024
post photo preview

Watch the full episode here: 

placeholder
 

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Wednesday, March 20. 

Tonight: Israel's war in Gaza, now in its sixth month, is still raging without any end in sight. In the last week, several leading international aid organizations, as well as the World Bank, documented that what they call a catastrophic famine among the 2.2 million people of Gaza is no longer merely probable, but rather inevitable and imminent. There are well-documented cases now of young Palestinian children, including babies, dying of hunger, the single worst and most painful way for a human being to die. At the start of the war, back in October, Israel's defense minister, Yoav Gallant, vowed that Israel would block all food and water from entering Gaza, and they have obviously made very good on that war promise. 

People obviously have very different views on this war. That is an obvious statement. It is very polarizing. But there is one point that is simply beyond dispute. This is not Israel's war only, but also America's. In particular, it is Joe Biden's war. Immediately after October 7, Joe Biden flew to Israel to do what he has done so many times in his decades in Washington, namely, he promised Tel Aviv unlimited financing and arms from the American Treasury for their new war without any conditions. Last November, an Israeli general admitted what many Israel supporters in the U.S. often try to deny, namely that the only reason that Israel is capable of fighting this war for six months and destroying Gaza is because of the financial and military support it provided by President Biden and conversely, if Joe Biden cut off American aid to Israel, Israel's ability to continue to bomb, occupy and destroy Gaza would come to an end. That admission has significant implications for American citizens, American policy and American values. And we will examine those tonight.  

Then: one of Donald Trump's closest aides, Peter Navarro, went to prison today for four months. His crime: he refused to comply with a congressional subpoena that directed him to appear for a hearing of the January 6 committee. Navarro's argument for refusing to attend that hearing was that the information they sought was protected by executive privilege, and regardless of what might think of that defense, what matters here is that many top Washington officials over the years have been formally charged with contempt of a subpoena by Congress, but Navarro is the very first in American history to ever go to jail for this crime. Over and over, American law is being weaponized, and the criminal justice system is politicized by the very people who claim that they are the only guardians of American democracy and norms. We will take a look at this case to see yet again what pro-establishment anti-Trump lawfare really looks like when it's in its most vivid form. 

And then finally: last month, President Biden nominated a longtime corporate lawyer named Sparkle Sooknanan for a lifelong position on the federal court as a district court judge. Today, Sparkle Sooknanan appeared for a confirmation hearing in the Senate, and one of her most critical interrogators was Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. Hawley focused on the work she did for the large corporate law firm Jones Day, where she defended multiple hedge funds who are trying to extract as much wealth as possible from Puerto Rico right after the island suffered a massive debt crisis and Jones Day and this Biden nominee attempted to leave ordinary people who are bondholders in Puerto Rico on the hook for that debt, while hedge funds created all sorts of innovative arguments to ensure that they were paid in full. 

Senator Hawley's line of questioning reveals a great deal about the reality of both political parties when it comes to values and policies like corporatism and neoliberalism, and it also reveals a lot about the types of people the White House chooses to shape American law for decades to come through lifelong appointees to the federal bench. We'll examine this genuinely interesting exchange that happened in the Senate and highlight what it reveals. To help us explore that, we will speak to the good friend of our show, Matt Stoller of the American Economics Liberties Project, who is one of the country's leading antitrust experts and also a vocal critic of what is often called Big Law, namely, the massive, sprawling corporate law firms that often lobby defend the nation's centers of financial and political power. Matt has worked in almost every nook and cranny in Washington for years. He understands it and critiques it as anyone and always has a lot of interesting things to say, and I'm sure that tonight will be no exception. 

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
25
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: Another Week Another News Cycle

What’s happening in politics that you want to talk about? Are there any burning topics you think Glenn needs to cover? Any thoughts you’d like to share?

This post will be pinned to our profile for the remainder of this week, so comment below anytime with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Glenn will respond to a few comments here—and may even address some on our next supporters-only After Show.

Thank you so much for your continued support through another week of SYSTEM UPDATE with Glenn Greenwald!

Let's have a great week everyone!

🏆Dog-of-the-Week:

Dog-of-the-Week goes to TOBY. Our well-groomed cohost kept Victor company as Glenn responded to the Locals community questions.

British musician Winston Marshall schools Pelosi on populism at Oxford, while arguing against “This House Believes Populism is a Threat to Democracy.” Marshall argued that "populism is the voice of the voiceless,” & “The real threat to democracy is from the elites.” Awesome smackdown!

placeholder
11 hours ago

https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4646417-top-senators-believe-the-us-secretly-recovered-ufos/

Mother of all conspiracy theories is that we could be off of fossil fuels. For decades technologies that provide abundant FREE energy have been suppressed. Zero point energy aka anti-gravity technologies have been known and they come from ET civilizations. Petro-nazi's (big oil) has spent huge amount of efforts to keep the public confused about the truth.

post photo preview
As the Daily Wire Publicly Negotiated a Debate with Candace Owens, it Secretly Sought -- and Obtained -- a Gag Order Against Her
Due to a prior restraint order against Owens, the much-anticipated Israel debate with Ben Shapiro appears to be off.

On April 5, Candace Owens publicly invited her former Daily Wire colleague Ben Shapiro to a debate about "Israel and the current definition of antisemitism." It was Owens' criticisms of U.S. financing of Israel, and her criticisms of Israel's war in Gaza, that caused her departure from the Daily Wire two weeks earlier.

Both Shapiro and Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing responded by saying they would like to arrange the debate requested by Owens. That night, Shapiro appeared to accept her offer, writing on X: "Sure, Candace. I texted you on February 29th offering this very thing." The Daily Wire co-founder added: "Let's do it on my show this Monday at 5pm at our studios in Nashville; 90 minutes, live-streamed."

After Owens objected to the format and timing, she and Boreing exchanged several tweets in which they appeared to be negotiating, and then agreeing to, the terms and format for the debate. Owens had suggested the debate be moderated by Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman. Shaprio said he wanted no moderator. They ultimately agreed to the terms, with Boreing offering a series of conditions, including a no-moderator debate, and with Owens publicly accepting

Two weeks later, many readers of both Shapiro and Owens noticed, and complained, that the debate had not yet happened. On April 24, Owens addressed those inquiries by explaining that the Daily Wire had yet to propose dates, while reiterating her strong desire to ensure the debate happened.

But the debate was never going to happen. That is because the Daily Wire -- in secret and unbeknownst to its readers -- sought a gag order to be placed on Owens after she had called for a debate. They did this under the cover of secrecy, before a private arbitrator, at exactly the same time that they were claiming in public that they wanted this debate and were even negotiating the terms with her. To this date, the Daily Wire has not informed its readers, seeking to understand why the much-anticipated debate had not yet happened, that they had sought and obtained a gag order against Owens.

When seeking a gag order to be imposed on Owens, the Daily Wire accused her of violating the non-disparagement clause of her agreement with the company. To substantiate this accusation, the company specifically cited Owens' initial tweet requesting a debate with Shapiro as proof of this disparagement, along with concerns she voiced that Shapiro appeared to be violating the confidentiality agreement between them by publicly maligning Owens's views to explain her departure from the company. While the company claimed before the arbitrator that it did not object in principle to a "healthy debate," it urged the imposition of a gag order on Owens by claiming that the way she requested the debate constituted disparagement of Shapiro and the site.

To justify the gag order it wanted, the company also cited various criticisms of the Daily Wire and Shapiro on X that Owens had "liked." This proceeding took place as part of an exchange of legal threats between the parties after the public agreement to debate about Israel was solidified. Those threats arose from the fact that various Daily Wire executives and hosts, in both public and private, were castigating Owens as an anti-Semite. On March 22, Daily Wire host Andrew Klaven published a one-hour video that hurled multiple accusations, including anti-Semitism, at Owens. The Daily Wire cited Owens' response to that video -- her defense of herself from those multiple accusations -- as further proof that she needed to be gagged.

The initial tweet from Owens not only requested a debate, but also included a video from the popular comedian Andrew Schulz, who had mocked the Daily Wire for firing Owens over disagreements regarding Israel, and specifically mocked Shapiro for his willingness to debate only undergraduate students. The tweet underneath Owens's original debate request included a summary of Schulz's mockery of Shapiro which stated: Schulz now "realizes Ben Shapiro is only good at debating college liberals & can’t win debates against serious competition." 

After the prior restraint hearing sought by the Daily Wire and Shapiro, the arbitrator sided with them and against Owens. The arbitrator agreed with the Daily Wire that Owens' call to debate Shapiro, and her follow-up negotiations of the debate, constituted "disparagement" of the company and Shapiro. The company argued that any further attempt by Owens to debate, as well her suggesting that the debate would expose the Daily Wire's real "priorities," constituted criticisms of the site and of Shapiro, criticisms that the arbitrator concluded Owens was barred from expressing under her contract with the company.

The arbitrator thus imposed a gag order of prior restraint on Owens. Among other things, the order banned Owens from saying or doing anything in the future which could tarnish or harm the reputation of the Daily Wire and/or Ben Shapiro. Given that the Daily Wire had argued, and the arbitrator agreed, that Owens' offers to debate Shapiro about Israel and anti-semitism were themselves "disparaging," the Daily Wire has ensured that the debate with Owens that they publicly claimed to want could not, in fact, take place. Any such debate would be in conflict with the gag order they obtained on Owens from expressing any criticisms of the site or of Shapiro.

When asked for comment to be included this story, Owens replied: I "wish I could comment on this but I can’t." She added: "can neither confirm nor deny."

Boreing said: "your story is inaccurate to the point of being false," though he did not specify a single inaccuracy, nor did he deny that the Daily Wire had sought and obtained a gag order on Owens at the same time they were publicly posturing as wanting a debate with her. The confirmation we obtained of all these facts is indisputable. Boreing added: "I’m sure you can appreciate how fraught a high profile break-up like this is. For that reason, we are trying to resolve our issues with Candace privately."

It certainly seems true that the Daily Wire is attempting to achieve all of this "privately." Nonetheless, Ben Shapiro has constructed his very lucrative media brand and persona based on his supposed superiority in debating, a reputation cultivated largely as a result of numerous appearances at undergraduate schools around the country where he intrepidly engages with students who are often in their teens or early twenties. Both Shapiro and the Daily Wire have also predicated their collective media brand on an eagerness to engage in free and open debate with anyone, and to vehemently oppose any efforts to silence people, especially those in media, from expressing their political views.

It was the imperatives of this media branding that presumably led the Daily Wire and Shapiro to publicly agree to a debate with Owens over Israel and anti-semitism in the first place. Indeed, when it became apparent early after the start of Israel's war in Gaza that Owens had major differences with Shapiro, Boering responded to calls from Israel supporters for Owens to be fired by proclaiming in November: 

[E]ven if we could, we would not fire Candace because of another thing we have in common - a desire not to regulate the speech of our hosts, even when we disagree with them. Candace is paid to give her opinion, not mine or Ben’s. Unless those opinions run afoul of the law or she violates the terms of her contract in some way, her job is secure and she is welcome at Daily Wire.

But a mere four months later, Owens, despite being of one of the company's most popular hosts, was out. The company had concluded that her increasingly vocal criticisms of Israel, opposition to U.S. financing of it, and her views on anti-semitism were incompatible with the Daily Wire's policies.

All of those issues would likely have been the subject of the public debate that Owens sought, and that the Daily Wire claimed to want. Instead, the Daily Wire has succeeded in obtaining a gag order that, on its face, prevents Owens, in advance, from questioning or criticizing both the Daily Wire or Shapiro in any way.

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
THE WEEKLY UPDATE: MAY 6-10
Weekly Newsletter

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week on SYSTEM UPDATE. 

—Glenn Greenwald

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
SYSTEM UPDATE RECAP: May 6-10
Weekly Recap

Welcome to the SYSTEM UPDATE recap, your weekend digest featuring everything we’ve covered throughout the previous week. 

Prefer to listen to your daily news analysis? Reminder that FULL episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE are available anywhere you listen to podcasts🎙️

Enjoy!


MONDAY, MAY 6 - EPISODE 267

Russia-Ukraine War Escalates Amid Nuclear Threats, Israel Was Motive Behind TikTok Ban; PLUS: Batya Ungar-Sargon on New Book 

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (7:26)

Dangerous Escalation Threats (12:46)

Pro-Israel Repression (38:06)

Interview with Batya Ungar-Sargon (52:40)

Outro (1:39:02)

 

TUESDAY, MAY 7 - EPISODE 268

TikTok Constitutionally Challenges Forced Sale, Lawmakers Exploit Holocaust to Feed Moral Panic over Antisemitism; PLUS: The Ozempic Craze with author Johann Hari

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (9:09)

TikTok Ban (15:29)

Antisemitism Moral Panic (41:30)

Interview with Johann Hari (55:55)

Outro (1:23:15)

 

Supporters-Only After Show for Tuesday, May 7

We moved to Locals for our supporters-only, interactive after show where Glenn shared his thoughts on some audience questions and comments:

 

First, Glenn reveals his thoughts on the 2024 Pulitzer Prize winners. 

 

@JJohnx

Johann Hari was infamously involved in a plagiarism/Wikipedia attack on colleagues a number of years back. Does Glenn believe that JH has moved on from this and paid the price. Because I first became aware of him at the time of this scandal, rightly or wrongly, I find it difficult to listen without alarm bells ringing as it were.

 

Available for paid supporters here

Want to join us every Tuesday and Thursday for this supporter-exclusive, live after show? Become a paid supporter here!

 

FRIDAY, MAY 10

Rumble Live: Defending Your Human Right to Freedom of Expression

Glenn Greenwald joins Rumble Live in Toronto to discuss the importance of defending the human right to freedom of expression as Canada prepares to enact the restrictive “Online Harms Act.” 


WATCH THE SPEECH

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals