Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
Zelensky Begs DC for Money—While Torturing US Journalist, Gonzalo Lira. Bill Ackman’s Long-Time Censorship Crusade Gets Results. Google Loses Massive Anti-Trust Suit, w/ Matt Stoller [Part 1 of 2]
Video Transcript
December 14, 2023
post photo preview

Watch the full episode here: 

placeholder
 

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Tuesday, December 12. 

Tonight, Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, goes to Washington today, again, with his hand held out for more American money—again. The Biden administration, after first blocking any possibility of a diplomatic resolution at the start of the Russia-Ukraine war almost two years ago has now spent more than $110 billion in American resources to fuel this war, accomplishing little other than guaranteeing the destruction of Ukraine, sending hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian and Russian men to their deaths and all but ensuring that Russia will end up controlling roughly one fifth, at least, of what had been Ukrainian territory.  

Over the last month, President Zelenskyy's closest allies in Kiev have run to the Western press to turn on both Zelenskyy and the war, accusing the Ukrainian leader of everything from having become an authoritarian to becoming “delusional” about his obviously baseless belief that Ukraine still has some chance to expel all Russian troops from Ukrainian soil. But none of that stopped Zelenskyy from going to the White House today and doing what he does best, demanding more American money. He made the rounds with the American media and also met with members of Congress to plead, demand and insist that still more American money be transferred to keep fueling this increasingly futile but as destructive as ever war. 

Most revealingly, Zelenskyy even met with the CEOs of most of the true beneficiaries of this war, the only beneficiaries of this war, the arms dealers in Washington. We’ll tell you the key events that are transpiring on his trip. 

Then: few people outside the world of high finance and academia knew the name Bill Ackman on October 7 when Hamas attacked Israel. Yet almost immediately, almost overnight, this multibillionaire, a hedge fund manager and fanatical supporter of Israel, went on a rampage against anyone and anything inside the United States insufficiently supportive of Israel, at first in a very public way, helping compile blacklists of American college students who committed the crime of placing blame on Israel for the long-standing conflict with the Palestinians – insisting that they not be hired by other CEOs – and then using his vast wealth to coerce Harvard and other institutions to intensify their censorship attacks aimed at Israel critics. It has been bizarre watching so many Israel supporters and assorted Republicans and even conservatives march behind Bill Ackman and celebrate him as a hero and to watch him celebrate himself as one (he really did recently praise his own courage because what could be scarier than being an American billionaire supporting Israel in the United States? One can barely fathom the courage that it must require!) 

Bill Ackman is what every conservative and even many liberals claim—usually—to despise: a billionaire who weaponizes his wealth to cancel and destroy the careers of those who disagree with him and who tries to dictate to major American universities which political views they may and may not permit to be expressed. And he's hardly alone when it comes to pro-Israel billionaires in the United States. But the last few months have taken people like Bill Ackman out of the shadows and thrust them into the very public spotlight and it's vital to realize that his cause, while masquerading as some sort of noble fight against university wokeness, is really nothing other than an attempt to force universities to prohibit and punish criticism of this foreign country for which he harbors so much affection. 

Finally, the Justice Department prepares to go to trial against Google in one of the most significant antitrust suits brought by the U.S. government, one that was commenced, incidentally, by the Trump administration. Google just suffered a major defeat in a courtroom in San Francisco against a private corporation. A company named Epic Games, which is the creator of Fortnite, won a jury verdict that Google's use of its Google stores on Android phones violates America's antitrust laws. They sued on 11 counts and the jury quickly after just three hours of deliberation, ruled against Google on all eleven counts. We'll speak with one of the nation's premier antitrust and Google experts, Matt Stoller, of the American Economic Liberties Project to tell us what all of this means. It doesn't seem to bode very well for Google and many of its upcoming fights with various private and public entities that are claiming it is a legal monopoly. 

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting now.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
1
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: Another Week Another News Cycle

What’s happening in politics that you want to talk about? Are there any burning topics you think Glenn needs to cover? Any thoughts you’d like to share?

This post will be pinned to our profile for the remainder of this week, so comment below anytime with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Glenn will respond to a few comments here—and may even address some on our next supporters-only After Show.

Thank you so much for your continued support through another week of SYSTEM UPDATE with Glenn Greenwald!

Let's have a great week everyone!

🏆Dog-of-the-Week:

Dog-of-the-Week goes to TOBY. Our well-groomed cohost kept Victor company as Glenn responded to the Locals community questions.

21 hours ago

https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4646417-top-senators-believe-the-us-secretly-recovered-ufos/

Mother of all conspiracy theories is that we could be off of fossil fuels. For decades technologies that provide abundant FREE energy have been suppressed. Zero point energy aka anti-gravity technologies have been known and they come from ET civilizations. Petro-nazi's (big oil) has spent huge amount of efforts to keep the public confused about the truth.

Neocons continue to neocon. Lindsey Graham suggests using nukes on Gaza. Nevermind the fact that Israel is down wind from the blast zone and some settlements might be caught up in it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/sen-graham-says-israel-should-do-whatever-it-needs-to-do-to-survive-compares-war-in-gaza-to-wwii-210757189861

post photo preview
As the Daily Wire Publicly Negotiated a Debate with Candace Owens, it Secretly Sought -- and Obtained -- a Gag Order Against Her
Due to a prior restraint order against Owens, the much-anticipated Israel debate with Ben Shapiro appears to be off.

On April 5, Candace Owens publicly invited her former Daily Wire colleague Ben Shapiro to a debate about "Israel and the current definition of antisemitism." It was Owens' criticisms of U.S. financing of Israel, and her criticisms of Israel's war in Gaza, that caused her departure from the Daily Wire two weeks earlier.

Both Shapiro and Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing responded by saying they would like to arrange the debate requested by Owens. That night, Shapiro appeared to accept her offer, writing on X: "Sure, Candace. I texted you on February 29th offering this very thing." The Daily Wire co-founder added: "Let's do it on my show this Monday at 5pm at our studios in Nashville; 90 minutes, live-streamed."

After Owens objected to the format and timing, she and Boreing exchanged several tweets in which they appeared to be negotiating, and then agreeing to, the terms and format for the debate. Owens had suggested the debate be moderated by Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman. Shaprio said he wanted no moderator. They ultimately agreed to the terms, with Boreing offering a series of conditions, including a no-moderator debate, and with Owens publicly accepting

Two weeks later, many readers of both Shapiro and Owens noticed, and complained, that the debate had not yet happened. On April 24, Owens addressed those inquiries by explaining that the Daily Wire had yet to propose dates, while reiterating her strong desire to ensure the debate happened.

But the debate was never going to happen. That is because the Daily Wire -- in secret and unbeknownst to its readers -- sought a gag order to be placed on Owens after she had called for a debate. They did this under the cover of secrecy, before a private arbitrator, at exactly the same time that they were claiming in public that they wanted this debate and were even negotiating the terms with her. To this date, the Daily Wire has not informed its readers, seeking to understand why the much-anticipated debate had not yet happened, that they had sought and obtained a gag order against Owens.

When seeking a gag order to be imposed on Owens, the Daily Wire accused her of violating the non-disparagement clause of her agreement with the company. To substantiate this accusation, the company specifically cited Owens' initial tweet requesting a debate with Shapiro as proof of this disparagement, along with concerns she voiced that Shapiro appeared to be violating the confidentiality agreement between them by publicly maligning Owens's views to explain her departure from the company. While the company claimed before the arbitrator that it did not object in principle to a "healthy debate," it urged the imposition of a gag order on Owens by claiming that the way she requested the debate constituted disparagement of Shapiro and the site.

To justify the gag order it wanted, the company also cited various criticisms of the Daily Wire and Shapiro on X that Owens had "liked." This proceeding took place as part of an exchange of legal threats between the parties after the public agreement to debate about Israel was solidified. Those threats arose from the fact that various Daily Wire executives and hosts, in both public and private, were castigating Owens as an anti-Semite. On March 22, Daily Wire host Andrew Klaven published a one-hour video that hurled multiple accusations, including anti-Semitism, at Owens. The Daily Wire cited Owens' response to that video -- her defense of herself from those multiple accusations -- as further proof that she needed to be gagged.

The initial tweet from Owens not only requested a debate, but also included a video from the popular comedian Andrew Schulz, who had mocked the Daily Wire for firing Owens over disagreements regarding Israel, and specifically mocked Shapiro for his willingness to debate only undergraduate students. The tweet underneath Owens's original debate request included a summary of Schulz's mockery of Shapiro which stated: Schulz now "realizes Ben Shapiro is only good at debating college liberals & can’t win debates against serious competition." 

After the prior restraint hearing sought by the Daily Wire and Shapiro, the arbitrator sided with them and against Owens. The arbitrator agreed with the Daily Wire that Owens' call to debate Shapiro, and her follow-up negotiations of the debate, constituted "disparagement" of the company and Shapiro. The company argued that any further attempt by Owens to debate, as well her suggesting that the debate would expose the Daily Wire's real "priorities," constituted criticisms of the site and of Shapiro, criticisms that the arbitrator concluded Owens was barred from expressing under her contract with the company.

The arbitrator thus imposed a gag order of prior restraint on Owens. Among other things, the order banned Owens from saying or doing anything in the future which could tarnish or harm the reputation of the Daily Wire and/or Ben Shapiro. Given that the Daily Wire had argued, and the arbitrator agreed, that Owens' offers to debate Shapiro about Israel and anti-semitism were themselves "disparaging," the Daily Wire has ensured that the debate with Owens that they publicly claimed to want could not, in fact, take place. Any such debate would be in conflict with the gag order they obtained on Owens from expressing any criticisms of the site or of Shapiro.

When asked for comment to be included this story, Owens replied: I "wish I could comment on this but I can’t." She added: "can neither confirm nor deny."

Boreing said: "your story is inaccurate to the point of being false," though he did not specify a single inaccuracy, nor did he deny that the Daily Wire had sought and obtained a gag order on Owens at the same time they were publicly posturing as wanting a debate with her. The confirmation we obtained of all these facts is indisputable. Boreing added: "I’m sure you can appreciate how fraught a high profile break-up like this is. For that reason, we are trying to resolve our issues with Candace privately."

It certainly seems true that the Daily Wire is attempting to achieve all of this "privately." Nonetheless, Ben Shapiro has constructed his very lucrative media brand and persona based on his supposed superiority in debating, a reputation cultivated largely as a result of numerous appearances at undergraduate schools around the country where he intrepidly engages with students who are often in their teens or early twenties. Both Shapiro and the Daily Wire have also predicated their collective media brand on an eagerness to engage in free and open debate with anyone, and to vehemently oppose any efforts to silence people, especially those in media, from expressing their political views.

It was the imperatives of this media branding that presumably led the Daily Wire and Shapiro to publicly agree to a debate with Owens over Israel and anti-semitism in the first place. Indeed, when it became apparent early after the start of Israel's war in Gaza that Owens had major differences with Shapiro, Boering responded to calls from Israel supporters for Owens to be fired by proclaiming in November: 

[E]ven if we could, we would not fire Candace because of another thing we have in common - a desire not to regulate the speech of our hosts, even when we disagree with them. Candace is paid to give her opinion, not mine or Ben’s. Unless those opinions run afoul of the law or she violates the terms of her contract in some way, her job is secure and she is welcome at Daily Wire.

But a mere four months later, Owens, despite being of one of the company's most popular hosts, was out. The company had concluded that her increasingly vocal criticisms of Israel, opposition to U.S. financing of it, and her views on anti-semitism were incompatible with the Daily Wire's policies.

All of those issues would likely have been the subject of the public debate that Owens sought, and that the Daily Wire claimed to want. Instead, the Daily Wire has succeeded in obtaining a gag order that, on its face, prevents Owens, in advance, from questioning or criticizing both the Daily Wire or Shapiro in any way.

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
THE WEEKLY UPDATE: MAY 6-10
Weekly Newsletter

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week on SYSTEM UPDATE. 

—Glenn Greenwald

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
SYSTEM UPDATE RECAP: May 6-10
Weekly Recap

Welcome to the SYSTEM UPDATE recap, your weekend digest featuring everything we’ve covered throughout the previous week. 

Prefer to listen to your daily news analysis? Reminder that FULL episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE are available anywhere you listen to podcasts🎙️

Enjoy!


MONDAY, MAY 6 - EPISODE 267

Russia-Ukraine War Escalates Amid Nuclear Threats, Israel Was Motive Behind TikTok Ban; PLUS: Batya Ungar-Sargon on New Book 

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (7:26)

Dangerous Escalation Threats (12:46)

Pro-Israel Repression (38:06)

Interview with Batya Ungar-Sargon (52:40)

Outro (1:39:02)

 

TUESDAY, MAY 7 - EPISODE 268

TikTok Constitutionally Challenges Forced Sale, Lawmakers Exploit Holocaust to Feed Moral Panic over Antisemitism; PLUS: The Ozempic Craze with author Johann Hari

Full transcript available for paid supporters: HERE

 

WATCH THE EPISODE

Intro (9:09)

TikTok Ban (15:29)

Antisemitism Moral Panic (41:30)

Interview with Johann Hari (55:55)

Outro (1:23:15)

 

Supporters-Only After Show for Tuesday, May 7

We moved to Locals for our supporters-only, interactive after show where Glenn shared his thoughts on some audience questions and comments:

 

First, Glenn reveals his thoughts on the 2024 Pulitzer Prize winners. 

 

@JJohnx

Johann Hari was infamously involved in a plagiarism/Wikipedia attack on colleagues a number of years back. Does Glenn believe that JH has moved on from this and paid the price. Because I first became aware of him at the time of this scandal, rightly or wrongly, I find it difficult to listen without alarm bells ringing as it were.

 

Available for paid supporters here

Want to join us every Tuesday and Thursday for this supporter-exclusive, live after show? Become a paid supporter here!

 

FRIDAY, MAY 10

Rumble Live: Defending Your Human Right to Freedom of Expression

Glenn Greenwald joins Rumble Live in Toronto to discuss the importance of defending the human right to freedom of expression as Canada prepares to enact the restrictive “Online Harms Act.” 


WATCH THE SPEECH

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals