Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
Massive Media Layoffs Expose Collapse in Public Trust, w/ Hannah Cox. PLUS: New Video Deepens Jan. 6 Pipe Bomb Mystery, w/ Darren Beattie
Video Transcript
January 26, 2024
post photo preview

Watch the full episode here: 

placeholder
 

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Thursday, January 25. 

Tonight: it is not an exaggeration to say that major parts of the liberal corporate media are now in complete freefall. Just in the past few weeks, some of the most recognizable media brands have suffered massive layoffs or even been brought to the brink of extinction, including the Los Angeles Times, Time Magazine, NBC News, Sports Illustrated, National Geographic, and Business Insider. BuzzFeed, months ago, completely abolished its news division. Just this week, the L.A. Times laid off 25% of its already decimated newsroom in just one day, just months after it laid off 13% of its workforce. It is hard to put into words just how extreme and complete is the implosion of Brooklyn-based liberal digital media over the last several years. Given that difficulty, I am forced to rely upon one of the giants of American journalism, a prophet of digital media, and a true pioneer in how to report on teenager influencer TikTok houses, The Washington Post Taylor Lorenz, who, in a video this week about all these events, said: “Pretty much the entire digital media ecosystem that myself and a lot of other millennial journalists came up in has been completely hollowed out.” 

Indeed it has. There is no doubting the truth of that statement. But what is missing so conspicuously and revealingly from all of these discussions by these failing journalists, not just the dean of digital media, Taylor Lorenz, about the collapse of the industry around them is what role they themselves have played in generating this massive failure. They love to whine and cry in public when their jobs disappear. They're very adept at blaming others for why nobody cares about what they write and say anymore. They're very passionate in condemning and heaping scorn on the sectors of the media that are actually growing and thriving, namely independent media, where free discourse and political heterodoxy are permitted rather than crushed. But the one thing they will never, ever, do is look in the mirror and ask what they did to contribute to the destruction of the large sector of media to which they belong. 

It is hard to blame them for refusing to look at that. If your face were covered with unsightly boils and open wounds and oozing infections and unidentified unsightly growths, you two would be reluctant to gaze upon your visage in the mirror. You'd do anything to avoid that. But the irrefutable truth is that except for a few media giants—such as The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal—most of the liberal corporate media is in full-scale collapse. The public hates them to the extent that they care about them at all. Every poll shows that the American mainstream media is held in lower esteem than just about any other group in America, with the possible exception of pedophiles and telephone marketers—and even there, they're just barely ahead of those groups. 

I really do try hard not to take pleasure in other people's misery and suffering. It is, in my view, unhealthy for one soul to do that often. However, I do take pleasure in the destruction of industries and companies that I regarded as deeply harmful and toxic to society and that absolutely includes the vast majority of these failing media outlets, which have become little more than servants of establishment power and deliberate dissemination of disinformation and propaganda for Partisan ends. The collapse of trust and faith in mainstream journalism is an important development in American life and one that is really worthy of examination and yet it so rarely receives that examination because the guardians of our discourse are the ones who most want to avoid it. And so today is what we will do. To help us engage in that analysis, we will be joined by the media analyst and commentator Hannah Cox, whose response to Terry Lorenz's State of the Media address was bold, scathingly hilarious, but also deeply illuminating. 

Then: the journalist who has done among the most important work in exposing many of the lies and deceit surrounding the mythology and official narrative of January 6 has been Darren Beattie, the political scientist from Duke, the former Trump speechwriter and the founder of the news site “Revolver News.” From the beginning, Darren has exposed all sorts of inconsistencies and unproven claims in the state's narrative about January 6, from the FBI's role to the mysterious involvement of people like Ray Epps and especially the still unsolved case of the alleged domestic terrorist who was said to have planted pipe bombs near both the DNC and RNC headquarters, including one near Kamala Harris, one of the central allegations that made January 6 seem far scarier and more menacing. 

Newly discovered video evidence has enabled Beattie to break down much of what we were told about these pipe bombs and has raised serious questions about who it is, who planted those, and why. We would talk to Beattie about this and about the latest in the January 6 investigations.

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
14
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
1° Prêmio David Miranda

This is the video we showed on the Locals stream tonight, from the David Miranda Institute event that was held last Sunday.

00:03:49
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis says Kamala Harris Would Combat "Rampant Antisemitism" on College Campuses

Colorado Governor Jared Polis tells Michael Tracey that Kamala Harris has been a staunch supporter of Israel and that she would rein in the "rampant antisemitism" he says exists on college campuses.

00:04:18
Michael Tracey Interviews Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) in "Spin Room"

Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) tells Michael Tracey that it makes sense for Kamala Harris to welcome Dick Cheney's endorsement because this election is about supporting someone who "respects the rule of law." He then avoids answering whether Dick Cheney respected the Constitution...

00:01:35
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
post photo preview
January 04, 2025
post photo preview
January 05, 2025

One of the writers I follow on Substack describes why "journalists" fail to appreciate Glenn:
Stephen Obisanya
1d
New Outlook
I realize why so many journalists and photojournalists I’ve met have so much hatred for Glenn Greenwald and often accuse him of many things, among them “chasing the highs of his groundbreaking Snowden revelations,” or “grifting to his rightwing audience because it’s all about the money to him.”
Glenn represents the singular outside critic, the traditional journalist who has yet to abandon his values and principles for access within the journalism/political industry. Glenn is always taking apart these types of industry journalists, holding up the mirror to their faces and having them face what they’ve become, what they’ve sold out, the damage they’ve collectively done to the industry. And many of these journalists hate what they see. But instead of confronting that mirrored image, they concoct the most foolish reasons to call Glenn’s character ...

post photo preview
The Key Issues Determining the Trajectory of the Second Trump Administration: From Israel and Ukraine to Populism and Free Speech
System Update #382

The following is an abridged transcript of a segment from System Update’s most recent episode, lightly edited for clarity and readability. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.

System Update is an independent show that is free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!


I don't think there's any question that Trump is one of the most, if not the most consequential presidents of our lifetime. That's neither praise nor critique. That's just an observation that I think is undeniably true. The impact that he has had on media, the impact that he's had on political coalitions, the impact that he's had on policy, on political culture throughout the West and beyond, I think is far beyond any other specific president. Maybe Richard Nixon is the president who competes with him in terms of how consequential he was – and his presidency was – for better or for worse. But I would say Trump is probably the most consequential and the main reason for that, in my view, is how much he deviates from prior presidential patterns. Whatever you say about Donald Trump, you cannot say he's an ordinary political figure or an ordinary president. 

One of the things I think is most worth noting about Trump, the thing that for me has always been a vessel of potential, a reason why I think that there's something not only interesting but positive in Trump's emergence on the political scene is precisely the fact that, unlike virtually every president from either political party in my lifetime who is sort of a person you just wind up and they reflexively embrace the most sacred authorities of DC's power centers, in part because they are byproducts of them, they're sort of strivers, people who have been training their whole life to become president, they're trained above all else in how to say and believe the things that advance their careerism, their self-interest and their political agenda, they just are reflexively unrevolutionary, eager not to alienate powerful people, and therefore they're very reliable vessels for establishment dogma. Trump has spent his entire life doing exactly the opposite. The fact that he wasn't even in politics at all, in any elected capacity or as a candidate, basically until 2016, when he was 71 years old, I think is what enabled him to be so willing to reject ideas, positions, and pieties that presidents previous to him, major presidential candidates previous to him, would never even dream of rejecting because the cost is too high, the anger on the part of powerful and influential people is too intense. And yet, for whatever reasons, Trump has constituted in such a way as to not really care about that, I think he does crave at a certain level, gaining approval and being liked, but there's a bigger part of him that is willing to incur the wrath of the people who are most powerful. 

As a result, this unpredictability, I think is central to understanding Trump.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Facing Imminent Firing Squad, Liz Cheney Awarded Presidential Medal
System Update #381, Part 2/2

The following is an abridged transcript of a segment from System Update’s most recent episode, lightly edited for clarity and readability. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.

System Update is an independent show that is free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!


As the media informed us before the 2024 election, a victory by Donald Trump would almost certainly result in the imminent execution of Liz Cheney, probably by firing squad as - they claimed -Trump, shortly before the election, threatened to do. Liz Cheney was effectively the running mate of Kamala Harris and thus fortified her status as a liberal icon, a liberal hero, even more than she did when participating in the highly produced TV show called “The January 6 Committee.” 

Earlier on January 2, the White House announced that Joe Biden “would bestow” a presidential medal on Liz Cheney tonight, despite the fact that she continues to be a vocal advocate of an array of policies implemented by her dad that liberals have long condemned not just on policy grounds but said were fascist and un-American. 

Indeed, Liz Cheney received that medal tonight from Joe Biden at the White House, while Biden staff and fans in attendance swooned as if they were teenagers who had just seen Elvis Presley. There are few developments, if there are any, that better reflect the identity and the value system of the current Democratic Party than their repeated and ongoing desire to heap praise – and now presidential awards – on Dick Cheney's like-minded daughter. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Weekly Update
From January 2nd to January 3rd

Welcome to a new year of System Update!

While you adjust to our show’s first (full) week back from the many end-of-year holidays, we understand some of you may have missed last week’s episodes, and so we’re back with another Weekly Update to give you every link to all of Glenn’s best moments from Thursday to Friday. The new year is here, and so are System Update’s ambitions. As we say in Brazil, “Feliz ano novo!”

 

Daily Updates

THURSDAY: Terror Attacks & Liz Cheney’s Firing Squad

In this episode, we talked about…

  1. The narrative exploitation of terror attacks;

  2. And the ill-deserved presidential commendations of Liz Cheney;

FRIDAY: The Trump Administration’s Key Issues in 2025 

In this episode, we examined the…

  1. Trump Administration’s most pressing issues in 2025;

  2. System Pupdate: Meeting Nico!

 

About those question submissions: They’re LIVE!

We noticed that many of you didn’t submit recorded questions, possibly because the process was unclear. Regardless, we’re here to announce that our submission feature is now LIVE. Simply follow the Rumble Studio link included in our Tuesday and Thursday Locals after-show announcements to record your questions, share praise for our editors, or comment on current events.

Please be aware that shorter questions are easier to include in the after-show!

 

That’s it for this edition of the Weekly Update! 

We’ll see you next week…

“Nothing is over until we say it is!’ But... this week’s Weekly Update is, well, over…"

— John Belushi, defeated

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals