Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Culture • Writing
THE WEEKLY UPDATE: JAN 22-26
Weekly Newsletter
January 28, 2024
post photo preview

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week. These are written versions of the reporting and analysis we did on last week's episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE.

—Glenn Greenwald


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24 - SYSTEM UPDATE 215

Trump Wins New Hampshire & Utterly Shames the Establishment—Again, w/ Michael Tracey LIVE From NH

 

Biden’s Bombing Campaign Spreads Across Middle East w/ Expert Erik Sperling

Trump easily wins the New Hampshire primary, devastating the establishment’s desperate hope for a Nikki victory—with Michael Tracey; As the U.S. continues to escalate its illegal bombing campaign in the Middle East, Erik Sperling of Just Foreign Policy joins to explain why congressional assent in matters of war is so critical.

Donald Trump scored his second consecutive, decisive victory on the road to determining who will be the 2024 presidential nominee for the Republican Party. Trump defeated former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, his last remaining competitor—using a very generously broad definition of that term—by a margin of 12 points: 56-44. The only reason it was even that close is because New Hampshire is an open primary, meaning that all voters—not just Republicans—have the right to vote in whatever primary they choose. Enough left-leaning independents and even Democratic Party voters answered the call of Democratic Party leaders to vote for Haley that it made the real gap seem less humiliating. 

According to exit polls, Trump won 3 out of every 4 Republican voters, which means that had only Republicans been allowed to vote—as happens in many states—the margin of victory would have been 50 points, not 12. Trump's control of the Republican Party is historically massive and no longer in question. Haley—clearly addicted to the lavish media praise she has been getting, as well as the dreams of how much she can monetize her candidacy—is so committed to moving the GOP towards a more pro-establishment position that she's willing to go next to South Carolina, where she's certain to lose to Trump by a wide margin despite that being her state. Even the person Haley herself anointed to be a U.S. Senator—Tim Scott—endorsed Trump as soon as he dropped out of the race, as have many of the most prominent South Carolina office holders.

The fact that Trump's victories in these primaries are predicted and expected is causing the extraordinary nature of his victories to be overlooked. It is virtually impossible to overstate how much has been done by virtually every major center of power in the United States to sabotage Trump's candidacy, destroy his reputation, and all but force voters to choose someone else. They have not only poured massive sums of money into that effort, and have not only had almost every major media corporation devote 7 years to depicting him as a literal Hitler figure, but they are trying to bar him from the ballot and even making history by becoming the first party in power to use their control over the judiciary to prosecute and imprison their leading opponent. Yet, he just keeps winning. 

The collapse of establishment power and credibility as illustrated by Trump's resilience and all-but-inevitable victory continues, in our view, to be a story of historic significance, and we will do everything possible to examine all facets of that tonight, including even having on yet again the intrepid independent journalist Michael Tracey, joining us from New Hampshire, where he has spent the last week or so reporting.

PLUS: Even if it's not being reported this way, the Biden administration has heavily involved the U.S. not in 2 new major wars, but in 3 new major wars. It has financed and armed the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. It is financing and arming Israel's now-three-month-old war in Gaza. And it is absolutely involved in a new regional war that involves bombing Syria, Iraq and especially Yemen—a country that they have bombed at least six times in the last two weeks, with vows from the White House to continue.

As we have been reporting, none of this has been done without the slightest whiff of Congressional debate, let alone Congressional approval. And the warnings we issued after the first bombing of Yemen are now more visible than ever—when a President starts new wars without involving Congress, it is not just a technical violation of the Constitution but also dangerous in its own right, as it can easily lead to the type of endless war we are now seeing with no strategic plans, no metrics for success, no exit plans, and no weighing of benefits versus the risks of regional escalation and full-scale war. We'll examine the latest in what can only be called this new Middle East war, and we'll speak with Erik Sperling, the Executive Director of the DC advocacy group Just Foreign Policy, one of the few DC advocacy groups that applies its principles and values without the slightest regard for which party it helps or hurts. And they have been leading the way in arguing why it is so vital that Biden, if he's going to continue to expand this Middle East war, at least seek the approval of Congress so that a public debate is had.

 

READ THE FULL STORY

WATCH THE EPISODE


THURSDAY, JANUARY 25 - SYSTEM UPDATE 216

Massive Media Layoffs Expose Collapse in Public Trust, w/ Hannah Cox

 

New Video Deepens Jan. 6 Pipe Bomb Mystery, w/ Darren Beattie

The liberal, mainstream sector of the press is in free fall, as massive layoffs follow a well-deserved collapse in public trust, with Hannah Cox.; PLUS: Darren Beattie with the latest from the Jan 6 pipe bomb mystery.

It is not an exaggeration to say that major parts of the liberal corporate media are in complete free fall. Just in the past few weeks, some of the most recognizable media brands have suffered massive layoffs or even been brought to the brink of collapse, including the Los Angeles Times, TIME Magazine, NBC News, Sports Illustrated, National Geographic and Business Insider. BuzzFeed months ago completely abolished their news division. Just this week, the LA Times laid off 23% of its already-decimated newsroom in just one day. In wake of just seven months ago, it laid off 13% of its workforce. Thus, laying off well over a third of their newsroom in under a year. 

It is hard to put into words just how extreme and complete is the implosion of Brooklyn-based liberal digital media over the last several years. Given the difficulty, I am forced to rely upon one of the giants of American journalism, a prophet of digital media, and a true pioneer in how to report on teenage influencer TikTok houses: the Washington Post's Taylor Lorenz, who in a video this week said: "Pretty much the entire digital media ecosystem that myself and a lot of other millennial journalists came up in has been completely hollowed out." Indeed, it has. There is no doubting the truth of that statement.

But what is missing—so conspicuously and revealingly—from all of these discussions by these failing journalists about the collapse of the industry around them is what role they themselves have played in generating this massive failure. They love to whine and cry in public when their jobs disappear. They are very adept in blaming others for why nobody cares about what they write and say. They are passionate in condemning and heaping scorn on the sectors of the media that are actually growing and thriving: namely, independent media where free discourse and political heterodoxy are permitted. But the one thing they will never, ever do is look in the mirror and ask what they did to contribute to the destruction of this large sector of media.

And it is hard to blame them for refusing. If your face were covered with unsightly boils and open wounds and oozing infections and unidentified unsightly growths, you, too, would be reluctant to gaze upon your visage in the mirror. But the irrefutable truth is that with the exception of a few media giants—such as the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal—most of the liberal corporate media is in full-scale collapse. The public hates them to the extent they care about them at all. The American mainstream media is held in lower esteem than just about any other group with the possible exception of pedophiles and phone marketers—and even there, they are just barely ahead. 

I try hard not to take personal pleasure in other people's misery and suffering. It is, in my view, unhealthy for one's own soul to do so. But I do take pleasure in the destruction of industries and companies that I regard as deeply harmful and toxic, and that absolutely includes the vast majority of these failing media outlets, which are little more than servants of establishment power and deliberate disseminators of disinformation for partisan ends. And the collapse of trust and faith in mainstream journalism is an important development in American political life, and one that is worthy of examination. 

And so that is what we will do, and to help us we will be joined by the media analyst and commentator Hannah Cox, whose response to Lorenz's State of the Media address was both scathingly hilarious and deeply illuminating.

PLUS: The journalist who has done among the most important work in exposing many of the lies and deceits surrounding the mythology of January 6 has been Darren Beattie, the political scientist from Duke, former Trump speechwriter, and founder of the site Revolver News. From the beginning, Darren has exposed all sorts of inconsistencies and unproven claims in the state's narrative about January 6—from the FBI's role to the mysterious involvement or Ray Epps and, especially, the still-unsolved case of the alleged domestic terrorist who is said to have planted pipe bombs near Kamala Harris, one of the central allegations that made January 6 seem far scarier and more menacing.

Newly discovered video evidence has enabled Beattie to break down much of what we were told about these pipe bombs, and has raised serious questions about who it is who planted those, and why. We will talk to Beattie about this, and about the latest in the January 6 investigations.

 

READ THE FULL STORY

WATCH THE EPISODE


FRIDAY, JANUARY 26 - SYSTEM UPDATE 217

Biden & McConnell Fail to Get $60B More for Ukraine

 

Is Biden Risking Re-election Over Israel?

 

Plus: Israeli Knesset Member Ofer Cassif, Staunch War Critic

After weeks of negotiations, no deal was reached to send another $60 billion to Ukraine–an exceedingly rare setback for the military-industrial complex. Biden campaign hemorrhages support over Israel posture–Will it cost him the election? Interview with Israeli lawmaker and staunch Israelcritic, Ofer Cassif.

Two political figures in Washington have been united in a desperate effort to obtain another $60 billion in American resources for Ukraine: the Democratic President Joe Biden, and GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. The two of them have been the most fanatical supporters of Ukraine from the start, and yet have now encountered a serious problem in getting Ukraine tens of billions more: namely, Trump and his GOP House supporters—along with increasing numbers of Americans—are vehemently opposed to further aid to Ukraine. And while they seemed willing at first to provide it in exchange for meaningful concessions from the Biden White House to fortify border security, it now appears that such a deal cannot be reached, seriously jeopardizing Biden and McConnell's push for more Ukraine aid. There are some fascinating and revealing dynamics at play here, and we will review them.

PLUS: The premise of the Democratic Party and their allies in the corporate media is that literally nothing is more vital than defeating Donald Trump in the 2024 election. And yet poll after poll has revealed that—on top of all of the other unavoidable, serious vulnerabilities that Joe Biden has in his re-election bid: from perceptions that he's far too old and affirmed to complete a second term to widespread dissatisfaction his management of the economy, inflation, and the border crisis—one of Biden's most important policies is producing a serious risk of infuriating and permanently alienating his own base voters to the point that they will simply refuse to vote for him, no matter how much they are convinced to fear a second term of Donald Trump. 

The policy that has enraged many of Biden's key voting constituencies is his steadfast, unlimited, and ongoing support for Israel—both generally and in its destruction of Yemen. Extraordinarily high percentages of young voters, liberal voters, and Arab/Muslim voters believe not only that Biden's career-long defense of Israel is wrong, but that it now constitutes support for genocide. And once someone believes that about an incumbent president—that they are guilty of enabling and arming and protecting a genocide—it is going to be very difficult to convince those same people to go and vote for the very person they have spent months accusing of genocide. Biden officials are now finally recognizing the seriousness of this danger. 

On some level, one might say there's something admirable about it: namely, that Biden has been one of Israel's most ardent and steadfast defenders of Israel for so long that he seems willing to follow through on his convictions even if it risks costing him votes he desperately needs for his re-election. In the age of Trump, the one thing Democrats have been able to count on is the blind and unstinting loyalty of all types of Democratic voters to fall into line in the name of stopping Trump. Is Biden's extreme support for Israel and his financing and arming of its war in Gaza really something that could risk alienating his core voting base? Possibly, and we'll take a look at that.

FINALLY: Ofer Cassif is—at least for now—an elected member of the Israeli Knesset. He was on our show just a couple of weeks after the October 7 Hamas attack on his country and, while he vehemently denounced what Hamas did, he warned then that Israel was preparing to unleash a level of destruction and violence against Gaza and its civilian life that would be virtually unparalleled in modern warfare. He also issued very grave warnings about the rapid erosion of core civil liberties in Israel, with critics of Netanyahu and his war—such as Cassif—facing various types of reprisals and threats.

Three months later, we’re sitting down for an interview with him to explore how the war has progressed, the serious threats he now faces to be removed from his elected position in the Knesset as a result of his support for South Africa's charge of genocide against Israel, what the perception is in Israel of Biden's support for the Israeli war effort, and much more. As a prelude to that interview, we will fill you in on some of the latest developments in this war, including a preliminary decision today by the International Court of Justice on the case brought by South Africa, as well as a harrowing video of the murder of Palestinian civilians in front of a British news crew that underscores what exactly the U.S. has been supporting. 

As always, we know that there are differing views among our audience about this war. But given that this is now an American war as much as it is an Israeli one—the U.S. is not only financing and arming the war but paying an increasingly higher price for it—we regard it as a journalistic duty and a journalistic value to continue to present views and facts that are not readily available elsewhere so that you can continue to make your own decisions about how you feel about U.S. support for this war, that has not only already escalated in the Middle East but has no end in sight.

 

READ THE FULL STORY MONDAY

WATCH THE EPISODE

community logo
Join the Glenn Greenwald Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
5
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Answering Your Questions About Tariffs

Many of you have been asking about the impact of Trump's tariffs, and Glenn addressed how we are covering the issue during our mail bag segment yesterday. As always, we are grateful for your thought-provoking questions! Thank you, and keep the questions coming!

00:11:10
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Breaks Down Trump's DOJ Speech on Fox News
00:04:52
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Discusses Mahmoud Khalil on Fox News
00:08:35
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
QUICK: Ask Questions for Today's Mailbag!

Glenn will be discussing the Israel-Iran conflict and a Trump Administration official who is in an awkward political predicament, so questions on other topics are more likely to be chosen.

Seymour Hersh said the US will commence action this weekend.
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/what-i-have-been-told-is-coming-in

Cool Episode of ‘The Why Files’……

post photo preview
U.S. and Israel vs Iran: Repeating War on Iraq Scripts; Overwhelming Bipartisan Consensus for Israel's Wars
System Update #469

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXeYkVcgzcgVgwTH4HsgQ-PsjfJnkkerEMKzJUBNbex49ctiCfUGCSwgs9h6Vn3qKESfxyvgEpfVQz8nobvNvfVrE9z8iBrAZvKRdf7iPZ-2Qov6I426kA0Sqc0Yy6Oh5amLisL1-RzSK5ykf5mGHyE?key=aMiM9imCrTsNamRKd6Vfew

The war initiated by Israel against Iran last Thursday was dangerous from the start and has each day only become more dangerous. President Trump has boasted of his pre-war coordination with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He's already been using U.S. military assets to protect Israel. He's now even re-deploying aircraft carriers in the Pacific, where we're told they are guarding against America's greatest enemy – China – now to the Middle East, where Israel has demanded they go to support its war. 

Just a few minutes ago, President Trump ordered the 16 million people who live in Tehran to immediately evacuate a city where it's now 2 a.m. 

With Israel, as always, demanding more. Now, they want the U.S. planes and bombs to destroy Iran's underground nuclear facilities for them. The former Israeli defense minister went on CNN just an hour ago and told President Trump in the U.S. that it's our obligation to fight this war with them. And for them, President Trump has repeatedly opened the possibility of even greater U.S. involvement in the war. 

There are so many aspects of this new conflict worth covering and dissecting –and we will do so throughout the week – but tonight we want to focus on the amazing ease the U.S. government has in convincing its population to support whatever new war is presented to it. Over four years ago, intense war propaganda from the U.S. political class and media persuaded Americans to want to fund and arm the war in Ukraine – a war that is still dragging on with no favorable end in sight – and overnight huge numbers of people in the United States have suddenly become convinced without having ever said so previously that war with Iran is some sort of moral imperative as well as a strategic necessity for the survival of American citizens of the United States. 

No matter how debunked, discredited and disgraced that Iraq war narrative has become, as long as one just waits 20 or 25 years, then, apparently, that same script just works like magic all over again. You just haul it out, fearmongering, and huge numbers of people respond by saying, "Yes, let's go to war, let' kill people." 

We'll examine all of that, as well as the standard bipartisan unity in support of new American wars and especially wars involving Israel, you hear Democrats almost unanimously, either staying quiet or praising President Trump, with just a few exceptions from both parties. And we'll look at that as well. 

AD_4nXeYkVcgzcgVgwTH4HsgQ-PsjfJnkkerEMKzJUBNbex49ctiCfUGCSwgs9h6Vn3qKESfxyvgEpfVQz8nobvNvfVrE9z8iBrAZvKRdf7iPZ-2Qov6I426kA0Sqc0Yy6Oh5amLisL1-RzSK5ykf5mGHyE?key=aMiM9imCrTsNamRKd6Vfew

AD_4nXdXi3PHhIfI5UY5jue2s_VN_Dre1s5GH_qzxPS39EBWpyASwtOnszEASDMpdRuJzVlrD4idh5uDoPcdU38-w-kpHnSvAo9rtxSpcN4lW-sAiALyp2wxVRGqfHoLUqaYrKPxb_-HZMv3-aKzQLw90g?key=aMiM9imCrTsNamRKd6Vfew

If you're an American citizen as an adult, you have seen the United States repeatedly go to war. Anyone 18 or over has seen the United States involved in all sorts of wars and that's after the Iraq war, which is now 22 years ago. Essentially, if you're American, it means forever, for a long, long time, for many decades, that you are a citizen of a country that's always at war. 

After World War II, there was a very visible and clear pattern, which is that the U.S. government convinces its citizens, enough of them, to support the war at the beginning. They deluge them with war propaganda, which is extremely strong, primal, tribal and enough Americans initially support the war to let the U.S. government politically go and drop bombs or finance some other country to go drop bombs for it. Then, after six months, a year, or two years, or four years, polls show that Americans overwhelmingly oppose the war that they were convinced to support. Going back to the war in Vietnam, throughout the 1980s’ wars, the War on Terror in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Syria, in Libya, the financing of the war in Ukraine, Israel's destruction of Gaza, bombing Yemin and now this new war that the United States is becoming increasingly involved in, in lots of different ways and we're only on the fifth day.

You just see so many Americans on a dime the minute a new war is presented to them, with whatever pretext can be conjured, even if they're exactly the same pretext that most Americans lived through watching proved to be complete lies the last time it was used in 2003, even though it's exactly the same script, exactly the same pretext, coming from exactly the same people. You can get enough Americans to immediately stand up and start cheering for death and destruction and bombing. Not all, a very substantial minority oppose it, I think if the U.S. overtly gets even more involved in the war in Iran, obviously anything resembling ground troops entering Iran, but even perhaps prolonged bombing of Iran as well through U.S. jets and bombs, as President Trump has indicated and Israel has demanded, maybe some of that will erode, that support will erode. But all that's needed is enough support at the beginning of the war to let the government start it. And once the U.S. government enters the war, it doesn't matter anymore whether the people continue to support it; then it's just already done. All the normal arguments are assembled about why we can't stop, why we can't cut and run, why that would be appeasement, etc., etc. All the same scripts all the time, used over and over, and even though they get proven to be discredited, or unpersuasive, or full of lies, you just use the same ones each time. And that's how the United States stays as a country at war.

We've been hearing a lot of people saying, “Look, I'm happy that Israel is bombing Iran, as long as the U.S. has no involvement in the war, we don't enter it, we don't have to pay for it. As long as it's not our war, I'm fine with it.” But, of course, the entire Israeli military is funded by American taxpayers. Every time Israel has a new war, the weapons that it uses come from the United States, transferred to Israel. We pay for their wars, we arm their wars, we support diplomatically those wars and we use our military assets every single time and our intelligence apparatus to support and enable the war, as the United States is already doing. We already have multiple new U.S. military assets ordered to the region by President Trump. They're already active in protecting Israel from retaliation. President Trump openly said that he is considering the possibility of involving the U.S. even more directly in this war with Iran: "We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved," the president said. (ABC News. June 15, 2025.)

That all depends on what you mean by ‘involved.’ We're paying for the war, we're arming the war, we've deployed military assets that are actively now trying to shoot down missiles coming from Iran as retaliation for the Israelis launching a completely unprovoked attack on Iran, based on the claim that Iran was about to get nuclear weapons, just weeks away, something they've been saying for 30 years, as we've shown you many times, same thing that was said in 2002. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
U.S. Involvement in Israel's Iran Attack; the View from Tehran: Iranian Professor on Reactions to Strikes; CATO Analysts on Dangers and War Escalations

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXd1VoS9xg7si8ZviLBfSqd9c5_FMQdODz9RYxLWVBvtebHFOs0oWtttaWP_7qvL_VZdS0enruALLjYbkU-CdLQUDxNECHRbc5Y9OjrLuK-6y6Uq602-Q9fTzTYkN5_S0oVACoqvAhTWU86eCRc8vZU?key=lmRJixp6Jlz5wRA3fSBDAg

Today's most important news is obvious: Israel last night launched a major military assault on Iran, targeting residential buildings in Tehran, where military commanders and nuclear physicists live with their families, as well as bombing multiple nuclear facilities throughout the country. 

Triumphalist rhetoric flooded American and Israeli discourse almost immediately, until just a little bit ago, when a barrage of Iran's ballistic and hypersonic missiles began hitting Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and other major population centers. Escalation seems virtually inevitable at this point. The level of escalation – always the most dangerous question when a new war has started – is most certainly yet to be determined. 

Then there's the question of the role of the United States and President Trump in all of this. News reports from both the U.S. and Israeli media suggested this morning that Trump was working hand-in-hand with the Israelis to pretend that he was still optimistic about a diplomatic resolution with Tehran, but did so only as a ruse to convince the Iranians that Trump intended to restrain Israel and thus lure Iran into a false sense of security when, in fact, Trump was not only green-lighting the attack but actively working with the Israelis to launch it. President Trump's own statements today proudly boasting of the success of the attack, along with his own concrete actions such as ordering U.S. military assets into position to yet again defend Israel, strongly bolster those reports and clearly indicate a direct U.S. involvement in this war between Israel and Iran, a U.S. involvement that already exists and will almost certainly continue to grow over the next few days and perhaps few weeks and even months. 

We’ll speak to Professor Mohammad Marandi, who is in Tehran and has heard and witnessed a lot of what happened but also has some unique analysis from his role as an American Iranian scholar of foreign policy and to scholars Justin Logan and Jon Hoffman, from the Cato Institute, one of the very few think tanks in the United States, which has long counselled restraint and non-interventionism in U.S. foreign policy. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Federal Court Dismisses & Mocks Lawsuit Brought by Pro-Israel UPenn Student; Dave Portnoy, Crusader Against Cancel Culture, Demands No More Jokes About Jews; Trump's Push to Ban Flag Burning
System Update #466

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXejs0DWGiP8ieMfNSDSHxWeGpA0bYQ2sB6GX53BerQgLDbevN48qlCXkh11p78EUWG7xmSLMCw_dta-m52iwfsgIA3W2CeT9zra6jIl7Krf7sFz7NI2c-vDb2dnkU0ifL9MRhw4ltCOYIB3YKvkIQQ?key=UyjQkErH6uhdu9Xo5Lcq4g

In the first segment, we’ll talk about the victimhood narrative that holds that American Jews, in general, and Jewish students on college campuses in particular, are uniquely threatened, marginalized and endangered. One of the faces of this student victimhood narrative has become Eyal Yakoby, who is a vocal pro-Israel activist and a student at the University of Pennsylvania. 

In 2024, he was invited by House Republicans to stand next to House Speaker Mike Johnson and he proclaimed: I do not feel safe. He said it over and over. “I do not feel safe” has kind of become the motto for his adult life. Now, he seized on those opportunities by initiating a lawsuit against the University of Pennsylvania seeking damages for what he said was the school's failure to fulfill its duties to keep him safe. Mind you, he was never physically attacked, never physically menaced, never physically threatened, but nonetheless claimed that the school had failed to keep him safe and told the congress in the country that he did not feel safe. 

The federal judge who is presiding over his lawsuit, who just happens to be a Jewish judge, a conservative judge, appointed by George W. Bush, not only dismissed Yakoby's lawsuit as without any basis, but really viciously mocked it, depicting his claims as a little more than petulant entitled demands from a privileged Ivy League student who wants to not be exposed to any ideas or political activism that might upset him – sort of depicting him as the Princess in “The Princess and the Pea,” Andersen’s literary fairytale about a princess who's so sensitive to anything that might concern her, that she's even unable to sleep if there's a pea buried beneath the seventeenth mattress on which she sleeps. 

This judicial decision is worth examining not only for the schadenfreude of watching one of America's whiniest pro-Israel activists be exposed as a self-interested fraud that he is, but also for what it says about the broader narrative that has been so relentlessly pushed and so endlessly exploited from so many corners, insisting that the supreme victim group of the United States is, of all people, American Jews. 

Then: speaking of extreme entitlement, Barstool founder Dave Portnoy made quite a name for himself over many years by ranting against the evils of cancel culture, championing the virtues of free speech, and viciously mocking as snowflakes and as people who are far too sensitive anyone who takes offense at jokes, offensive jokes told by comedians. That is what made it so odd – yet so telling – when this weekend we watched the very same Dave Portnoy viciously berated one of his employees for disagreeing with Portnoy's insistence that while jokes about everyone and every group continue to be appropriate, there must now be one exception: namely, according to Portnoy, jokes about Portnoy's own group,  American Jews,  must now be suspended and deemed too dangerous to permit. 

AD_4nXejs0DWGiP8ieMfNSDSHxWeGpA0bYQ2sB6GX53BerQgLDbevN48qlCXkh11p78EUWG7xmSLMCw_dta-m52iwfsgIA3W2CeT9zra6jIl7Krf7sFz7NI2c-vDb2dnkU0ifL9MRhw4ltCOYIB3YKvkIQQ?key=UyjQkErH6uhdu9Xo5Lcq4g

AD_4nXeNPsWu8SYZVkQAs1AKBVzXSCqCNnJSXFRz97DnkaHGIxGix2Zh6YmbJTQCrmPrgX3vqBOePYDLHyYhwxRNyY7s7q2Ucj32uOVbkk6jWZgH6dWxrUKjcwab1q_D0yJ_S0Fv_z7W0ckJp94i_tscuw?key=UyjQkErH6uhdu9Xo5Lcq4g

There have been really a lot of radical and fundamental changes, first on the political culture and then in our legal landscape as a result of the attack on October 7, and particularly the desire of the United States – by both parties – to arm the Israelis, to fund the Israelis, to protect the Israelis as they went about and destroyed Gaza. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals