Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Writing • Culture
SYSTEM UPDATE NEWSLETTER: DEC 11-15
Weekly Newsletter
December 17, 2023
post photo preview

We are pleased to send you a summary of the key stories we covered last week. These are written versions of the reporting and analysis we did on last week's episodes of SYSTEM UPDATE.

—Glenn Greenwald


MONDAY, DECEMBER 11 - SYSTEM UPDATE 196

Biden WH Seeks to Renew & Expand Domestic Spying—With Sen. Mike Lee. 

 

The US’ Long History of Silencing Israel Critics—on Campus, Media, & Beyond

 

A new attempt to block a powerful tool of the security state for domestic spying while a bipartisan coalition of intelligence agency aligned politicians work toward its renewal and even expansion; Sen. Mike Lee talks about Section 702, and how to stop it; Censorship for Israel continues and the consequences befall the American people. 

The United States exploited the fears that emerged after the 9/11 attacks in multiple ways. While the wars it started and the torture camps it installed around the world have largely come to an end—some 20 ending only years later—many of the most repressive and authoritarian domestic powers seized in the name of that terrorist attack endure to this very day. One obvious example is the Patriot Act, enacted in the days and weeks after that attack, and which was promised to be temporary; but every four years since, the Congress has re-authorized and renewed the Patriot Act, and now does so with virtually no debate—ensuring that what was once acknowledged to be a radical expansion of state power has now simply become normalized as part our political woodwork.

The same is true of the power grab that the US claimed—at first in secret, and then in the open—of the right to spy on the international communications of Americans citizens without having so much as to get a warrant first: one of the core Constitutional protections of the 4th Amendment. This was a power that the Bush/Cheney administration originally claimed in secret in early 2002. Once the New York Times was a Pulitzer for revealing the existence of this illegal spying power in 2005, the US Congress—under the leadership of Nancy Peolsi—acted to codify and legalize that warrantless domestic spying power by enacting Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.

The terms of that law required that it be renewed every five years. And since, then, it has been. In 2013, the Obama administration demanded renewal and got it. In 2018, Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff joined with numerous Republicans to give the Trump administration the same vast domestic spying powers—even while Schiff and Pelosi were accusing Trump of being a fascist and new Hitler, they acted to ensure that the Trump administration also enjoyed these virtually unlimited spying powers on American citizens.

Now the law is again up for renewal. This time, however, there is a serious bipartisan coalition—enraged by how many times the FBI has been caught abusing these powers—attempt to impose meaningful reforms on them as a condition for its renewal. Last week, we had on our program Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky to warn that pro-spying members of both political parties are attempting to work with the Biden WH not only to ensure quick renewal, but also to expand those spying powers even further. 

Senator Mike Lee, the Republican Senator from Utah, is now vocally warning about that attempt, and he'll be on with us tonight to discuss the prospects for stopping this bill and the reasons it's so dangerous.

Finally: The glaring abandonment of principle by many conservatives—especially those who have long posed as free speech champions—as they attempt in the wake of October 7 to usher in a wide range of censorship measures and classic cancel culture in the name of shielding Israel from criticism. Many conservatives have been consistent and denounced this—but many on the pro-Israel right who cheer this don't deny that it's a radical contradiction of their stated views and current actions. 

Instead, they claim, they are simply finally using the left's censorship tactics against them, finally forcing American liberals to live under the cancellation and censorship frameworks they have imposed on every one else. While that sentiment might be understandable, there is a major problem with that claim: namely, censorship against Israel critics in the U.S.—in academia, in media, and in the corporate world—has been doing on for many, many years in the U.S. There is nothing new about it. And we'll show you the very long history of how aggressive and extreme this censorship in the U.S. has long been in the name of protecting Israel. Silencing and punishing Israel's American critics is not some new tactic now being used at tit-for-tat against left-liberal censorship: it has long been one of the most common and pervasive forms of censorship that many on the right, who vocally champion free speech, have long ignored if not cheered.

 

READ THE FULL STORY: PART 1 & PART 2 

WATCH THE EPISODE


TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12 - SYSTEM UPDATE 197 

Zelensky Begs DC for Money—While Torturing US Journalist, Gonzalo Lira. 

 

Bill Ackman’s Long-Time Censorship Crusade Gets Results. 

 

Google Loses Massive Anti-Trust Suit, w/ Matt Stoller

 

President Zelensky makes a final plea to Joe Biden and the US congress to fund his conscription army while his own government officials call him ‘delusional.’ ‘Brave’ Bill Ackman is celebrated as a hero by Israel supporters as he tries to cancel people via X; Google loses a major antitrust suit against Epic Games—creator of Fortnite—friend of the show Matt Stoller joins to give all the details. 

Ukraine's President Vlodomyr Zelensky goes to Washington—again—with his hand held out for more American money—again. The Biden administration—after first blocking any possibility of a diplomatic resolution at the start of the Russia/Ukraine war—has spent more than $110 million in American resources to fuel the war, accomplishing little other than guaranteeing the destruction of Ukraine, sending hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian and Russian men to their deaths, and all but ensuring that Russia will end up controlling roughly ⅕ of what had been Ukrainian territory.

Over the last month, President Zelensky's closest allies in Kiev have run to the Western press to turn on both Zelensky and the war—accusing him of everything from having become an authoritarian to being "delusional" about his obviously baseless belief that Ukraine has any chance to expel all Russian troops from Ukrainian soil. But none of that stopped Zelensky from going to the White House, making rounds with American media, and meeting with members of Congress to plead, demand, and insist that more American money be transferred to keep fueling this increasingly futile but as-destructive-as-ever war. 

Then: Few people outside the world of high finance and academia knew the name Bill Ackman until Oct. 7, when Hamas attacked Israel. Almost immediately, the multi-billionaire hedge fund manager and fanatical supporter of Israel went on a rampage against anyone and anything insufficiently supportive of Israel—at first helping compile black lists of American college students who committed the crime of placing blame on Israel for the long-standing conflict with the Palestinians, then using his vast wealth to coerce Harvard and other institutions to intensify their censorship attacks aimed at Israel critics.

It has been bizarre watching so many Israel supporters and assorted Republicans march behind Bill Ackman and celebrate him as a hero—and to watch him celebrate himself as one: he really did recently praise his courage. Bill Ackman is what every conservative and even many liberals claim to despise: a billionaire who weaponizes his wealth to cancel and destroy the careers of those who disagree with him, and who tries to dictate to major universities which political views they may and may not permit to be expressed. And he's hardly alone. But the last two months have taken people like Bill Ackman out of the shadows and thrust them into the spotlight—and it's vital to realize that his cause—while masquerading as some sort of noble fight against wokeness—is nothing other than an attempt to force universities to prohibit and punish criticisms of this foreign country.

Finally: As the Justice Department prepares to go to trial against Google in an antitrust suit brought by the Trump administration, Google just suffered a major defeat in a courtroom in San Francisco. A company called Epic Games, the creator of Fortnite, won a jury verdict that Google's use of its Google Stores violates America's anti-trust laws. We'll speak with one of the nation's premiere antitrust and Google experts, Matt Stoller of the American Economic Liberties Project, to tell us what this means.

 

READ THE FULL STORY: PART 1 & PART 2

WATCH THE EPISODE.


WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13 - SYSTEM UPDATE 198 

Zelensky, Live on Fox, Re-Affirms His Own Tyranny. 

 

ADL’s Game-Playing w/ Hate Crime Stats. 

 

Media’s Gullible Embrace of Anon CIA Leaks. 

 

Shocking Censorship Escalation in Brazil

 

In a Fox News interview with Bret Baier, Zelenskyy continues the lie of “defending democracy” to shield criticism of the repressive and tyrannical political powers he has ushered in Ukraine in the name of fighting Russia; ADL manipulates hate crime statistics and manufactures its own antisemitism crisis in order to fight an information war on behalf of Israel; CIA leaks lies about Russian army and Ukraine; Brazilian Youtuber Monark faces consequences as political censorship grows. 

Ukrainian President is in Washington and, as we discussed on last night's show, he went to the White House and Congress to plead for more billions for his failed war effort, and then met with the true beneficiaries of this war—the CEOs of the American arms industry: Raytheon, Boeing, General Dynamics and the rest. December 13 on Fox News, Zelensky was asked by host Bret Baer about recent accusations by his closest Ukrainian allies that he has become an authoritarian and tyrant. Zelensky, rather than even attempt to deny the accusation, essentially affirmed his own autocracy—all while he insists that we must give him billions more to "defend democracy."

Then: The ADL has long been in the business of accusing people of being racists and anti-Semites in order to silence their opposition and force businesses to pay them substantial amounts of money to be released from those accusations. Ever since Oct 7, the ADL has found new allies as they seek to capitalize on the emotions surrounding the Hamas attack and the new-found efforts to silence Israel critics. Central to their campaign, and those of like-minded allies, is the cynical manipulation of hate crime statistics to try to invent a crisis that can be used to justify the repression of political speech. 

After that: Despite how many times the CIA, FBI and the rest of the US Security State routinely spreads lies by using anonymous leaks, every new leak is met with an instinctive belief on the part of many in media that these leaks—by virtue of appearing in major media outlets must be true. The CIA just engineered a leak about Russia's military that is so obviously designed to promote their primary foreign policy aim of securing billions more to keep the war against Russia going, and yet so many people who should know better gullibly treated the leak as proven fact, without an iota of questioning or skepticism. 

Finally: Censorship programs having been growing not only in the US but more broadly in the democratic world—in the EU, in the UK, in Canada, in Ireland, and in Brazil. These attacks on free speech in major countries are important in and of themselves, but also because each advancement of censorship powers is seen by other countries as a test case for how far they can go. Some of the most extreme systemic repression of political speech has taken place in Brazil—being used as a laboratory by the EU to see how far they can go—and earlier today news broke of one of the most extreme and truly shocking cases of political censorship.

 

READ THE FULL STORY: PART 1 & PART 2

WATCH THE EPISODE.


THURSDAY, DECEMBER 14 - SYSTEM UPDATE 199

Congress Again Renews FBI’s Warrantless Spying Power Over Americans. 

 

Vivek’s Revealing Clash w/ CNN on 1/6. 

 

Natasha Bertrand’s CIA Servitude. 

 

Dems Pretend to Chide Israel

 

FISA 702 renewal sneaks its way into the annual National Defense Authorization Act and passes with overwhelming support from the bipartisan consensus in Washington; At a CNN town hall, Vivek shocks host Abby Philips by citing evidence of Jan 6 being an “inside job” ; Natasha Bertrand—the CIA’s favorite corporate “journalist” —has a new article taken right from the mouths of intelligence community and government operatives; Faced with broad opposition from the base over the violence launched against Gaza, Biden and Dems feign concern and give lip service to humanitarian values while continuing to arm Israel unconditionally.

In Washington, the US Security State always gets its way. This, yet again, is exactly what happened over the last 24 hours as first the Senate, then the House, voted on a bipartisan basis to renew and extend the FBI's power to spy on the communications of citizens without warrants of any kind. 

Over the past two weeks, we had two lawmakers on our show—Senator Mike Lee of Utah and Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky—both of whom held out real hope that this time Congress would do its duty and at least impose limits, safeguards and reforms on the FBI—given the mountain of evidence proving that they abused these domestic spying powers. We'll show you what happened—how the FBI yet again won the right to hold onto this truly dangerous and authoritarian power—and, most of all, who in Washington is responsible for it.

Then: It is hardly a secret that the primary ideology of the corporate media is blind loyalty to the FBI, the NSA, the Pentagon and the rest of the agencies composing what Dwight Eisenhower called the military-industrial complex. Still, in a sewer of corporate media employes who perform this function, none is as corrupt about it, as mindlessly subservient to the CIA's talking points and agenda, as Natasha Bertrand—who proved her usefulness in this function by becoming the Queen of the most deranged parts of Russiagate. There was no CIA conspiracy theory beneath her dignity to spread—and then she became the first person to spread the CIA lie that the Hunter Biden laptop was "Russian disinformation." Bertrand has a new article on the Biden administration's view of the war in Israel, and it is really worth looking at just to see the kinds of rotted journalistic tactics that are not just acceptable but propel these people to ascend the corporate media ladder.

After that: GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy appeared on a CNN town hall with one of the network's personalities, Abby Phillips, who went there from being classified as a reporter with the Washington Post. Phillips asked Vivek about his statement that January 6 was an "inside job,” something he first said on this show and then repeated at the last GOP presidential debate. Phillips sought to prove that this was a false conspiracy, but rather than letting him answer, she used the tactic that has become the most common among incompetent TV interviewers: she just refused to let him speak, constantly talking over him, in large part because she had no idea what she was talking about, and in part because much of what Vivek was saying was demonstrably true, but she thought it was false because CNN never has its hosts tell its audience about it. There is a lot of illustrative meaning from this quite contentious exchange, so we'll break it down.

Finally: Democrats are playing a deeply cynical, even jaded, game when it comes to the posture of the Biden White House towards Israel's war in Gaza. From the start of the war, Biden did what he has done his entire political career: pledged complete, unlimited and unconditional financial and military support for Israel. He continued to do that even as the world began turning against the Israeli onslaught until Gaza. What changed, however, was polls began showing that the Democratic Party base was abandoning Biden over his support for Israel's war, and ever since, Democrats have been making theatrical gestures in public to pretend that they are chiding Israel and trying to limit what they can do, while in reality, they are telling the Israelis and making repeatedly clear that their financing and arming of Israel's war is unconditional and eternal. No matter your views on this war, this sort of deceitful game-playing should repulse you. At the very least, it deserves journalistic scrutiny and exposure.

 

READ THE FULL STORY: PART 1 & PART 2

WATCH THE EPISODE


FRIDAY, DECEMBER 15 - SYSTEM UPDATE 200

Tucker Carlson on Global Populism, the Censorship-Industrial Regime, Israel/Ukraine, His New Network, & More

Tucker Carlson has long been one of the most heterodox and fascinating journalists in American politics, whose daily coverage of world events on Fox News broke with the corporate media consensus on matters of foreign policy and economic orthodoxy. For the 200th episode, Glenn interviews Tucker Carlson for an in depth discussion on various topics including the crisis of free speech, the failures of neoliberalism, and the messianic lunacy of neoconservatism.

This week SYSTEM UPDATE commemorated the one-year anniversary of the debut of our show—our show launched on December, 12, 2022—and tonight marks the 200th episode of this program. To mark this anniversary, we have a special episode for you—we are devoting the program to a conversation I had on Wednesday with Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host whose program was canceled under mysterious circumstances despite being the most-watched show on cable news.

Tucker just announced that he was launching a brand new media outlet—the Tucker Carlson Network—that has quite high ambitions in terms of the kind of journalism it intends to do. We spoke with Tucker in a wide-ranging interview about that new project, but also about all sorts of pressing issues including the new US-supported war in Gaza; the about-face done by certain sectors of the American right since October 7 on issues such as free speech and cancel culture; the primary pathologies of corporate media; the possibility of his own political future, and much, much more.

This is the first time he's been on SYSTEM UPDATE and the result was an illuminating and different sort of conversation that we are confident you will enjoy.

 

READ THE FULL STORY MONDAY ON LOCALS.

WATCH THE EPISODE

community logo
Join the Glenn Greenwald Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Watch Tonight's Monologue

Due to a connection issue, our stream was cut short tonight.
You can find the entire episode below.

We apologize for this technical difficulty - thank you so much for your continued support.

00:43:24
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted
WEEKLY WEIGH-IN: Another Week Another News Cycle

What’s happening in politics that you want to talk about? Are there any burning topics you think Glenn needs to cover? Any thoughts you’d like to share?

This post will be pinned to our profile for the remainder of this week, so comment below anytime with your questions, insights, future topic ideas/guest recommendations, etc. Let’s get a conversation going!

Glenn will respond to a few comments here—and may even address some on our next supporters-only After Show.

Thank you so much for your continued support through another week of SYSTEM UPDATE with Glenn Greenwald!

Let's have a great week everyone!

🏆Dog-of-the-Week:

Dog-of-the-Week goes to TOBY. Our well-groomed cohost kept Victor company as Glenn responded to the Locals community questions.

Memes I hope you enjoy!😄

Society's (or the elite's) chosen narratives

Ukraine's plight was made a cause celebre at most every football and sports stadium in February 2022. What of the Palestinian cause or the Israeli cause?

Who chooses the causes that society should "celebrate"?

Image courtesy, BBC news report.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/60560567

post photo preview
post photo preview
As the Daily Wire Publicly Negotiated a Debate with Candace Owens, it Secretly Sought -- and Obtained -- a Gag Order Against Her
Due to a prior restraint order against Owens, the much-anticipated Israel debate with Ben Shapiro appears to be off.

On April 5, Candace Owens publicly invited her former Daily Wire colleague Ben Shapiro to a debate about "Israel and the current definition of antisemitism." It was Owens' criticisms of U.S. financing of Israel, and her criticisms of Israel's war in Gaza, that caused her departure from the Daily Wire two weeks earlier.

Both Shapiro and Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing responded by saying they would like to arrange the debate requested by Owens. That night, Shapiro appeared to accept her offer, writing on X: "Sure, Candace. I texted you on February 29th offering this very thing." The Daily Wire co-founder added: "Let's do it on my show this Monday at 5pm at our studios in Nashville; 90 minutes, live-streamed."

After Owens objected to the format and timing, she and Boreing exchanged several tweets in which they appeared to be negotiating, and then agreeing to, the terms and format for the debate. Owens had suggested the debate be moderated by Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman. Shaprio said he wanted no moderator. They ultimately agreed to the terms, with Boreing offering a series of conditions, including a no-moderator debate, and with Owens publicly accepting

Two weeks later, many readers of both Shapiro and Owens noticed, and complained, that the debate had not yet happened. On April 24, Owens addressed those inquiries by explaining that the Daily Wire had yet to propose dates, while reiterating her strong desire to ensure the debate happened.

But the debate was never going to happen. That is because the Daily Wire -- in secret and unbeknownst to its readers -- sought a gag order to be placed on Owens after she had called for a debate. They did this under the cover of secrecy, before a private arbitrator, at exactly the same time that they were claiming in public that they wanted this debate and were even negotiating the terms with her. To this date, the Daily Wire has not informed its readers, seeking to understand why the much-anticipated debate had not yet happened, that they had sought and obtained a gag order against Owens.

When seeking a gag order to be imposed on Owens, the Daily Wire accused her of violating the non-disparagement clause of her agreement with the company. To substantiate this accusation, the company specifically cited Owens' initial tweet requesting a debate with Shapiro as proof of this disparagement, along with concerns she voiced that Shapiro appeared to be violating the confidentiality agreement between them by publicly maligning Owens's views to explain her departure from the company. While the company claimed before the arbitrator that it did not object in principle to a "healthy debate," it urged the imposition of a gag order on Owens by claiming that the way she requested the debate constituted disparagement of Shapiro and the site.

To justify the gag order it wanted, the company also cited various criticisms of the Daily Wire and Shapiro on X that Owens had "liked." This proceeding took place as part of an exchange of legal threats between the parties after the public agreement to debate about Israel was solidified. Those threats arose from the fact that various Daily Wire executives and hosts, in both public and private, were castigating Owens as an anti-Semite. On March 22, Daily Wire host Andrew Klaven published a one-hour video that hurled multiple accusations, including anti-Semitism, at Owens. The Daily Wire cited Owens' response to that video -- her defense of herself from those multiple accusations -- as further proof that she needed to be gagged.

The initial tweet from Owens not only requested a debate, but also included a video from the popular comedian Andrew Schulz, who had mocked the Daily Wire for firing Owens over disagreements regarding Israel, and specifically mocked Shapiro for his willingness to debate only undergraduate students. The tweet underneath Owens's original debate request included a summary of Schulz's mockery of Shapiro which stated: Schulz now "realizes Ben Shapiro is only good at debating college liberals & can’t win debates against serious competition." 

After the prior restraint hearing sought by the Daily Wire and Shapiro, the arbitrator sided with them and against Owens. The arbitrator agreed with the Daily Wire that Owens' call to debate Shapiro, and her follow-up negotiations of the debate, constituted "disparagement" of the company and Shapiro. The company argued that any further attempt by Owens to debate, as well her suggesting that the debate would expose the Daily Wire's real "priorities," constituted criticisms of the site and of Shapiro, criticisms that the arbitrator concluded Owens was barred from expressing under her contract with the company.

The arbitrator thus imposed a gag order of prior restraint on Owens. Among other things, the order banned Owens from saying or doing anything in the future which could tarnish or harm the reputation of the Daily Wire and/or Ben Shapiro. Given that the Daily Wire had argued, and the arbitrator agreed, that Owens' offers to debate Shapiro about Israel and anti-semitism were themselves "disparaging," the Daily Wire has ensured that the debate with Owens that they publicly claimed to want could not, in fact, take place. Any such debate would be in conflict with the gag order they obtained on Owens from expressing any criticisms of the site or of Shapiro.

When asked for comment to be included this story, Owens replied: I "wish I could comment on this but I can’t." She added: "can neither confirm nor deny."

Boreing said: "your story is inaccurate to the point of being false," though he did not specify a single inaccuracy, nor did he deny that the Daily Wire had sought and obtained a gag order on Owens at the same time they were publicly posturing as wanting a debate with her. The confirmation we obtained of all these facts is indisputable. Boreing added: "I’m sure you can appreciate how fraught a high profile break-up like this is. For that reason, we are trying to resolve our issues with Candace privately."

It certainly seems true that the Daily Wire is attempting to achieve all of this "privately." Nonetheless, Ben Shapiro has constructed his very lucrative media brand and persona based on his supposed superiority in debating, a reputation cultivated largely as a result of numerous appearances at undergraduate schools around the country where he intrepidly engages with students who are often in their teens or early twenties. Both Shapiro and the Daily Wire have also predicated their collective media brand on an eagerness to engage in free and open debate with anyone, and to vehemently oppose any efforts to silence people, especially those in media, from expressing their political views.

It was the imperatives of this media branding that presumably led the Daily Wire and Shapiro to publicly agree to a debate with Owens over Israel and anti-semitism in the first place. Indeed, when it became apparent early after the start of Israel's war in Gaza that Owens had major differences with Shapiro, Boering responded to calls from Israel supporters for Owens to be fired by proclaiming in November: 

[E]ven if we could, we would not fire Candace because of another thing we have in common - a desire not to regulate the speech of our hosts, even when we disagree with them. Candace is paid to give her opinion, not mine or Ben’s. Unless those opinions run afoul of the law or she violates the terms of her contract in some way, her job is secure and she is welcome at Daily Wire.

But a mere four months later, Owens, despite being of one of the company's most popular hosts, was out. The company had concluded that her increasingly vocal criticisms of Israel, opposition to U.S. financing of it, and her views on anti-semitism were incompatible with the Daily Wire's policies.

All of those issues would likely have been the subject of the public debate that Owens sought, and that the Daily Wire claimed to want. Instead, the Daily Wire has succeeded in obtaining a gag order that, on its face, prevents Owens, in advance, from questioning or criticizing both the Daily Wire or Shapiro in any way.

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
INTERVIEW: Professor Jeffrey Sachs on Ukraine's Failures, Israel's War in Gaza, China, and More
Video Transcript

Watch the full episode here: 

placeholder
 

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Wednesday, May 15. 

Tonight: Professor Jeffrey Sachs is a renowned economist and policy analyst, who has held many positions at Columbia University, where he is currently a professor. He has served as Special Advisor to the U.N. Secretary General, is credited with guiding several countries out of major debt crises, and has become one of the nation's most influential scholars on international relations. He has been on System Update several times before – he is, for good reason, one of our audience's most popular guests, and we are always delighted to talk to him.

We spend significant time in our discussion on what has now become the obvious fact that Ukraine is now losing this war to Russia—exactly as many, including Professor Sachs, have long predicted, only to be accused of being a Russian agent for doing so. We also examine what U.S. motives are still driving the Biden administration to continue to fund a futile war, as well as the increasingly unhinged panic in many NATO states over what appears to be the inevitability of a Ukraine and NATO defeat—including French President Emmanuel Macron recently musing that NATO may need to deploy combat troops to fight along the Ukrainians against the Russian Army. 

We also delve deeply into the ongoing support, financing and arming of Israel's war in Gaza by the Biden administration, and where this war is headed. We talk about whether Biden's temporary suspension of the transfer of some weapons constitutes a genuine restriction on the Israelis, or whether it's just an empty, theatrical gesture. He offers a lot of insightful analysis about where the war goes from here and offers a particularly concise and illuminating explanation about all the incentive schemes in Washington that ensure the U.S. will always be heavily involved in various wars. Given that he is at Columbia, one of the campuses most affected by student protests against the war in Gaza, we discuss whether the crackdown on those protests is a threat to free speech. We conclude the interview by talking about China and its relationship with the U.S. As we reported last night, earlier this week, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán met with Chinese President Xi and emphasized how central that partnership is for Hungary's future growth and prosperity – something we are seeing in more and more countries around the world, in regions the U.S. once dominated. Professor Sachs analyzes why this is, and how the U.S.'s foreign policy is unwittingly fueling and strengthening China's standing in the world.


Two important notes: 

I need to correct an inaccurate statement I made last night as part of our report on this new bill pending in the House that would cut off funds for the U.S. Defense Department, U.S. State Department, and other agencies of the government unless and until President Biden reversers his temporary suspension of the transfer of some weapons transfer to Israel. 

We said that this bill, introduced by GOP House member Ken Calvert of California, was also supported by Democratic House Minority leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York. That was inaccurate: Jeffries opposes the bill – primarily because it denounces Biden – and is concerned that many House Democrats will vote for it and enable it to pass.

Secondly, The Prime Minister of Slovakia, Robert Fico, was targeted by an assassination earlier today, having been shot 5 times and is in critical condition. Prime Minister Fico is one of the most interesting figures in EU politics. Formerly a conventional left-liberal in his two prior stints as Prime Minister, last year, he ran on a campaign based on ceasing all further aid to Ukraine in its war against Russia, as well as opposing core EU dogma on immigration and health policy. For that reason, we covered his victory last year. No information is yet known about who the assassin was or what motivated the attack, so we will cover this tomorrow night once more is known.

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update and our interview with Professor Sacks starting right now.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
House Prioritizes Israel Over Funding U.S. Government; Seinfeld Commencement Debacle Fuels Antisemitism Panic; PLUS: China and Hungary's Close Ties Explained
Video Transcript

Watch the full episode here: 

placeholder
 

Podcast: Apple - Spotify 

Rumble App: Apple - Google


Good evening. It's Tuesday, May 14. 

Tonight: One of the most remarkable aspects of U.S. politics in the post-October 7 world is watching how vital and central Israel is to so many U.S. politicians in both political parties. Ever since Mike Johnson proclaimed immediately upon being elected House speaker that the very first thing he would do in his new speakership was to pass a bill to help “our dear friend Israel,” it is hard to deny that D.C. officials have devoted more time, more energy, and more passion to defending the interests of this one foreign country in Tel Aviv than they have to any other issue, including ones that actually affect the lives of American citizens. 

Seemingly, every week brings new ways of elevating Israel and its interest over the interest of the U.S. and the lives of American citizens, however, the House, led by both political parties, really outdid itself this week. Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, of New York, today announced his support for a bill—and I'm not kidding—that would cut off funding for various operations in the U.S.—Pentagon, the U.S. Department of State and other American agencies—unless the Biden administration announces a reversal of its decision to temporarily suspend the transfer of some weapons to Israel. In other words, Congress, both political parties, is prepared to proclaim that a condition for funding our own government and our own country's defenses is that President Biden first must vow that he will give everything Israel wants and demands without any conditions at all. 

I know this is hard to believe. I read the bill. I thought I was reading it wrong. So we will show you the bill and the statements in Congress supporting it, the obvious clarity that this bill will be enacted and approved on an overwhelmingly bipartisan basis, and will examine how this illustrates the broader, bizarre climate of Washington when it comes to prioritizing the needs and desires of this foreign government above our own government and the people our government nominally represents. 

Then, over the weekend, dozens of students at Duke University protested and walked out on the speech delivered by the commencement speaker, Jerry Seinfeld. Many fanatic Israel supporters, eager to continue their moral panic that the U.S. is facing an anti-Semitism crisis, insisted that this episode constituted further proof of anti-Semitism, even though the reason these students were protesting is that Jerry Seinfeld and his wife have been vocal defenders of the Israeli war in Gaza, and have even financed the pro-Israel counterprotest at UCLA, which turned violent when attacking pro-Palestinian protesters. Not because he's Jewish. We will examine this endless attempt to create a victimhood narrative for American Jews in the United States by absurdly claiming to find bigotry where it so plainly does not exist. 

And then finally, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban has become somewhat of a folk hero among the populist wing of the American right and populists around the Western world. For that reason, it has been somewhat disorienting and confusing for many of them to see that Viktor Orban is continuously strengthening Hungary's relationship with China, both financial, cultural and even political, and continues to insist on doing so even further, building stronger relations with China is vital to Hungary's interest. It’s worth examining why this is and what it says about how the U.S., through its policies, is doing more than anyone to help China's ascension in the world. 

For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals